Relationship Between Heart Rate, Rate of Perceived Exertion - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1
Slide2

Relationship Between Heart Rate, Rate of Perceived Exertion,

VO2max, and Distance Run in the Cooper 12 Minute Run Test in College Age Students

Kaity

Frost

Amy Nader

Rachael Stieber

Becky SuckowSlide3

introduction

Conflicting research in RPE music (Birnbaum, et al., 2009), (Wheeler, et al., 2010)Type of music (Potteiger, et al., 2000)

D

istraction hypothesis and

motivation (Russell, et al., 2003)

R

esearch lacks in the areas of VO

2

max and amount of work doneSlide4

hypothesis

Heart rate and rate of perceived exertion will be lower for the music condition. Along with this we also think that VO2max and the distance ran will be higher with the music condition.We predict that all four of the testing variables will be improved with the music condition.Slide5

Our

experiment inpractical termsWhy test RPE and distance run?Why measure VO2max?

How do these factors affect the way people exercise?Slide6

Participants

5 males, 5 females (although did not test gender)Between 19-21 years oldHad to meet CDC protocol for healthy adult physical activity lifestyles Had used AWC treadmills

before

Ran both conditions: music vs. no music

most beneficial if participants chose their own music (would be listening to their preference own of music)

eliminated two limitations that could have been present: lack of motivation and possibility of them disliking the

musicSlide7

R

an both conditions: music vs. no musicwith at least 48 hours in between5 minute warm-up (bike or light jog)Performed the Cooper

12 Minute Run

Test

treadmill

on a 1.0

incline

T

old to set a moderate pace, but were allowed to increase/decrease pace when desired

took note of speed changes and averaged them to find persons average speed throughout the test

C

overed tops of the treadmills showing the time, distance run, heart rate, and only left the speed controls showingwanted variables to be unknown

methodsSlide8

methods

Time was monitored by the time on the treadmillsAfter completion, we took note of their distance run1 person in our research team took each participant’s recovery heart

rate (15

seconds after

finished running)

U

sed distance run and recovery heart rate to calculate VO

2

max score using

equation in Table

12.3

from the Beam and Adams (2011) article(had to convert distance run to the nearest yard and find heart rate in beats per minute (take for 15 seconds and multiply by 4)

M

easured

rate of perceived exertion (RPE) by using the Borg’s RPE 15 point

scale

a

Likert

scale giving a numerical value to the degree of difficulty in which a participant feels during and right after a workout (CDC, 2011

)Slide9

6 

No exertion at all7    Extremely light (7.5)89  Very light1011  Light1213  Somewhat hard1415  Hard (heavy)1617  Very hard1819  Extremely hard

20  Maximal exertion

9 - "

very light"

exercise; for

a healthy person, it is like walking slowly at his or her own pace for some minutes

13

- "

somewhat hard" exercise, but it still feels OK to

continue

17 - "very hard" is very strenuous; a healthy person can still go on, but he or she really has to push him- or herself; it feels very heavy, and the person is very tired19 - extremely strenuous exercise level; for most people this is the most strenuous exercise they have ever

experienced

Borg

RPE

S

caleSlide10

Results

Calculated using a Paired Samples T-Test using SPSSused an alpha level of 0.050 for our level of significance (Neutens

&

Rubinson

,

2009

)

E

ach condition was tested with each of the 4

variables

Distance Ran, RPE, Heart Rate,

VO2maxSlide11

Graph A: This displays the statistical analysis of the mean number of miles completed in 12 minutes by 10 participants. The standard deviation of the means is also shown.Slide12

Graph B: This displays the statistical analysis of the mean rated value of perceived exertion by the 10 participants after running the Cooper 12 min. Run Test. The standard deviation of the means is also shown.Slide13

Graph C: This displays the statistical analysis of the mean measured heart rate by the 10 participants after running the Cooper 12 min. Run Test. The standard deviation of the means is shown as well.Slide14

Graph D: This displays the statistical analysis of the mean measured VO

2

max (mL·kg

-

1·min

-

1) by the 10 participants after running the Cooper 12 min. Run Test. The standard deviation of the means is shown as well.Slide15

Graph E: This displays Pairs 1-4 which exceed the value of the constant p-value which determines the significance of the experiment differential. This graph displays all variables to fail to be considered worthy of showing significant difference for exceeding the p-value constant (0.050). Slide16

conclusion

Hypothesis should be rejectedResults suggest it does not matter whether or not someone listens to music while working outm

usic

does

not affect the amount of work done, the heart rate, how hard they think their workout is, or the amount of oxygen consumed during the

workout (supported

by

a similar research done by Young

et. al

.,

(

2009))Before this study, our results had the potential to significantly change the way people might work outBased on our actual results, their workouts will not be affected when listening to music or notSlide17

For future research

Larger sample size make our results more significantSet a minimum speedto better predict the VO

2

max

- individuals must be working at a high level of

intensity

L

imit

other forms of physical

activity

participants had practices before or after the testingcaused participants to either be tired and sore or not work as hard before their practicesSlide18

QUESTIONS?Slide19

references

Beam, W.C. & Adams, G.M. (2011). Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual (6th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill.Birnbaum, L., Boone, T. & Huschle, B. (2009). Cardiovascular responses to music tempo during steady-state exercise. The Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 14, 50-57. Retrieved from Ebscohost. CDC. (2011). Physical Activity for Everyone. Retrieved October 11, 2011, from Center for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/guidelines/adults.htmlCDC. (2011). Perceived Exertion (Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale). Retrieved October 11, 2011, from Center for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/everyone/measuring/exertion.html

Neutens

, J. J. &

Rubinson

, L., (2009). Probability Level Alpha.

Research Techniques for Health Sciences 4/E

. San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.

Potteiger

, J. A., Schroeder, J. M., & Goff, K. L. (2000). Influence of music on ratings of perceived exertion during 20 minutes of moderate intensity exercise. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 91(3 Part 1), 848-854. Retrieved from

EBSCOhost

. Russell, W. W., Pritschet, B. B., Frost, B. B., Emmett, J. J., Pelley, T. J., Black, J. J., & Owen, J. J. (2003). A comparison of post-exercise mood enhancement across common exercise distraction activities. Journal of Sport Behavior, 26(4), 368-383. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.Wheeler, B. , Robertson, R., Swank, M., Miller, T., (2010). Effect of Music and Dialogue on perception of exertion, enjoyment, and metabolic responses during exercise. International Journal of Fitness, 6(2), 45-52.

Young, S. C., Sands, C. D., & Jung, A. P. (2009). Effect of music in female college soccer players during a maximal treadmill test. International Journal of Fitness, 5(2), 31-36. Retrieved from

EBSCOhost

.