Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist

Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist
1 / 1
Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 1 of 6 Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 2 of 6 Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 3 of 6 Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 4 of 6 Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 5 of 6 Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist - slide 6 of 6
Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist North Korea has invaded South Korea, prompting fears of an invasion of western Europe. It will continue until 1953 and involve European soldiers fighting alongside the USA against North Korea

Related Topics

Download this presentation From Below

"Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

Presentation Transcript

01
Context to decision 1: September 1950 Communist North Korea has invaded South Korea, prompting fears of an invasion of western Europe. It will continue until 1953 and involve European soldiers fighting alongside the USA against North Korea and China.
NATO is a military alliance that was set up in April 1949 and its first Secretary-General described its purpose as: “to keep the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down”.<br>
02
Context to decision 2: October 1950 The French government is totally opposed to the US proposal made in September.
The Italian government is prepared to back and develop the alternative plans that the French have, although they believe the US must be involved.
The Benelux countries are nervous about the US proposal, but think that continued US presence in Europe is vital for defence.
The British government is prepared to discuss the matter further; agreeing with the USA that the USSR is the major threat and that continental European countries need to contribute more to their own defence. Britain also believes that continued US involvement in European defence is vital and must not be jeopardised.<br>
03
Context to decision 3: May 1952 The USA and Britain are not totally happy with the proposal for a European Defence Treaty in October 1950, they prefer the idea of rearming West Germany as part of NATO. Neither country sees the necessity for supranational organisational structures to organise European defence that are separate from NATO. However, both countries are willing to enter negotiations to discuss the idea further.
Other European countries are also happy to enter negotiations.<br>