Design Decision: In Confidence Work stream:
Description: Design Decision: In Confidence Work stream: Author(s): Date: Version: Executive Summary Summary Approval TITLE Executive Summary and Approval Path Draft for Discussion Alignment to Blueprint (Title) Provide the audience with assurance that
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"Design Decision: In Confidence Work stream:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. Design Decision: In Confidence Work stream: Author(s):
Date:
Version:<br>
slide2. Executive Summary Summary Approval TITLE
Executive Summary and Approval Path Draft for Discussion<br>
slide3. Alignment to Blueprint (Title)
Provide the audience with assurance that you have ensured that the contents of this KDD are in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate blueprint. TITLE:
Alignment to Blueprint & Interdependencies with other KDDs Interdependencies Draft for Discussion KDD Interdependencies (No & Title)
List and provide a brief description of any interdependencies or possible interdependencies with other KDDs.
Briefly explain the current situation with regard to each interdependency. Mapping to EA Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 1)
Mapping to ICT Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 2)
Mapping to Org. Design Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 3)
Complete mapping to mapping to EA, ICT or Org. Design principles before progressing further<br>
slide4. TITLE
Background Context Other
Context Decision Required Draft for Discussion<br>
slide5. Option A Description:
Advantages:
Disadvantages: Option C Description
Advantages:
Disadvantages: RECOMMENDED Option B Description:
Advantages:
Disadvantages: TITLE :
Decision Required<br>
slide6. TITLE
Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion<br>
slide7. TITLE
Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion<br>
slide8. TITLE
Benefits Impact Assessment - definitions Draft for Discussion Guidance: The programme business case included benefits within three broad categories - customer, Government and Inland Revenue. The use of standard definitions to assess impacts on benefits (both positive and negative) will support the high-level KDD options analysis.
Depending on the scope of the options in the KDD, benefit impacts may touch the customer, the Government, Inland Revenue and/or a combination of these categories
Where the benefit impacts occur across more than one category, the KDD should reflect the highest rating.
If you require help with the assessment, please contact the Business case team<br>
slide9. TITLE
Cost Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion Guidance: A KDD’s cost impacts could be a one-off programme costs and there may also be on-going BAU costs. The use of standard definitions to assess impacts on costs will support the high-level KDD options analysis
Depending on the scope of the options in the KDD, cost impacts could be one-off programme cost, an on-going cost to the business and/or a combination of these categories.
Where the KDD has both a one-off and an ongoing cost impact, the KDD should reflect the highest rating.
If you require help with the assessment please contact the business case team.<br>
slide10. Appendix 1
TITLE
Mapping KDD to EA Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable. Draft for Discussion See separate EA principles template<br>
slide11. Appendix 2
TITLE : Mapping KDD to ICT Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable.<br>
slide12. Appendix 3
TITLE Mapping DD to Org. Design Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable.<br>
Date:
Version:<br>
slide2. Executive Summary Summary Approval TITLE
Executive Summary and Approval Path Draft for Discussion<br>
slide3. Alignment to Blueprint (Title)
Provide the audience with assurance that you have ensured that the contents of this KDD are in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate blueprint. TITLE:
Alignment to Blueprint & Interdependencies with other KDDs Interdependencies Draft for Discussion KDD Interdependencies (No & Title)
List and provide a brief description of any interdependencies or possible interdependencies with other KDDs.
Briefly explain the current situation with regard to each interdependency. Mapping to EA Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 1)
Mapping to ICT Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 2)
Mapping to Org. Design Principles (where applicable) (Appendix 3)
Complete mapping to mapping to EA, ICT or Org. Design principles before progressing further<br>
slide4. TITLE
Background Context Other
Context Decision Required Draft for Discussion<br>
slide5. Option A Description:
Advantages:
Disadvantages: Option C Description
Advantages:
Disadvantages: RECOMMENDED Option B Description:
Advantages:
Disadvantages: TITLE :
Decision Required<br>
slide6. TITLE
Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion<br>
slide7. TITLE
Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion<br>
slide8. TITLE
Benefits Impact Assessment - definitions Draft for Discussion Guidance: The programme business case included benefits within three broad categories - customer, Government and Inland Revenue. The use of standard definitions to assess impacts on benefits (both positive and negative) will support the high-level KDD options analysis.
Depending on the scope of the options in the KDD, benefit impacts may touch the customer, the Government, Inland Revenue and/or a combination of these categories
Where the benefit impacts occur across more than one category, the KDD should reflect the highest rating.
If you require help with the assessment, please contact the Business case team<br>
slide9. TITLE
Cost Impact Assessment Draft for Discussion Guidance: A KDD’s cost impacts could be a one-off programme costs and there may also be on-going BAU costs. The use of standard definitions to assess impacts on costs will support the high-level KDD options analysis
Depending on the scope of the options in the KDD, cost impacts could be one-off programme cost, an on-going cost to the business and/or a combination of these categories.
Where the KDD has both a one-off and an ongoing cost impact, the KDD should reflect the highest rating.
If you require help with the assessment please contact the business case team.<br>
slide10. Appendix 1
TITLE
Mapping KDD to EA Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable. Draft for Discussion See separate EA principles template<br>
slide11. Appendix 2
TITLE : Mapping KDD to ICT Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable.<br>
slide12. Appendix 3
TITLE Mapping DD to Org. Design Principles Note: Remove any rows that aren’t applicable.<br>