Human Ingenuity,ethics and the articulation
Author : tatiana-dople | Published Date : 2025-11-08
Description: Human Ingenuityethics and the articulation between MYP DP AAIBS Conference Adelaide April 2009 Roger Marshman The 2002 Adelaide Challenge What has the MYP to say about values Implication of constructivism Marshman R 2005
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download
Presentation The PPT/PDF document
"Human Ingenuity,ethics and the articulation" is the property of its rightful owner.
Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only,
and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all
copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of
this agreement.
Transcript:Human Ingenuity,ethics and the articulation:
Human Ingenuity,ethics and the articulation between MYP & DP AAIBS Conference Adelaide April 2009 Roger Marshman The 2002 Adelaide Challenge What has the MYP to say about values? Implication of constructivism Marshman, R. (2005). Constructivism, values and the IB continuum. Paper delivered at IBAEM Regional Conference, Athens. The trend towards explicitness in AoIs since 2002 Development and adoption of the LP since 2002 Page 3 Learner Profile should be Non absolutist Non fundamentalist Constructivist Not relativist either – others can also be wrong Antithesis of some approaches to “Character Education” – see Alfie Kohn: How not to teach values Today’s points of focus “… others with their differences can also be right” ; a pluralist not monist perspective Human Ingenuity (as an MYP Area of Interaction) in its concern with ethics Two aspects (but could be others) of the learner profile: Thinkers Reflective Getting to ToK: knowledge claims in values and ethics ToK: problems to be raised Values: Ethics of rewards and notions of authority Truth claims in cultural/religious behaviour Remembering claimed centrality for IB of Intercultural Awareness International mindedness 6 How do I learn best? How do I know? How do I communicate my understanding? Approaches to learning Are these the key questions? What are my values? Where have they come from? How are they Challenged? Defended? 8 An ATL aside: Sept 2005 Other possible G Qs What other strategies could I use? In what ways can I learn about this? Is there another view? What values do I bring to this task? How independent can I be? How can I claim to know? Think: What am I aiming for? Act: How will I do it? Reflect: How successful have I been? By what measure? A common thread in all this? The R word for better of for worse? The R word: reflection “Thinking about what you are doing” “Treacle; a confusing morass of meanings” “triumph of reason and science over instinct and feeling” “the consecration of emotion and feeling” Is this what we do? “By making every teacher and student the unchallenged arbiter of his or her own achievement, reflection dovetails neatly with progressive education’s preference for process over content and with the confessional, therapeutic strain of American culture.” Samuel Freedman, NY Times, 30 August 2006 Reclaiming the R territory Yes we can Yes we need to The MYP Planner is a significant tool We will return to