Postmodern playfulness in ‘Hag-Seed’ Some key
Description: Postmodern playfulness in Hag-Seed Some key postmodern devices, and analysing the end of the novel The Postmodern in Hag-Seed John Berger: Never again shall a single story be told as though it were the only one Unlike modernist
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"Postmodern playfulness in ‘Hag-Seed’ Some key" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. Postmodern playfulness in ‘Hag-Seed’ Some key postmodern devices, and analysing the end of the novel<br>
slide2. The Postmodern in ‘Hag-Seed’ John Berger: “Never again shall a single story be told as though it were the only one”
Unlike modernist literature, the postmodern rejects the notion of a text’s outright authority over meaning. Atwood’s ‘Hag-Seed’ can usefully be considered within a postmodern framework, especially with regard to what its conversation with ‘The Tempest’ reflects about textual authority, how meaning is made, and the purpose and nature of stories through time
Consider how Berger’s above quote reflects the literary conversation between ‘The Tempest’ and ‘Hag-Seed’ in terms of: ideas, styles, tropes & motifs, context, and the ‘telling’ of stories through time<br>
slide3. Intertextuality ‘Hag-Seed’ is an intertextual work at heart. The difficulty in discerning what is direct intertextuality, and what we the reader imply, makes the novel all the more postmodern
The arguably novel stands alone as its own narrative, but when read in the framework of its conversation with ‘The Tempest’, the allusions and intertextual transformations/subversions/diversions, are everywhere. Indeed, the more we read the book, the more we discover<br>
slide4. Poioumena ‘Poioumena’ refers to the use of a meta-fictive element in a text whereby the story itself becomes an account of the story being created/told (E.g. a book about the writing of the book)
In ‘Hag-Seed’, there is an element of poioumena in that the novel is centrally about the process of creating a play—of telling a story that has already been told, but which is being re-told for a new context, and in a very different world
This device also has another dimension in the context of these texts and their common story, for Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ is often read as a metaphorical reflection on his own process of creating plays and telling stories<br>
slide5. The hypothetical ‘multiverse’ Grmusa (2009) explains how postmodern works often “resist systematisation, and offer conclusions that are provisional and hypothetical, always liable to be overturned by yet another interpretation”
Nicol (2009) explains the common use of “multiverse” in postmodern narrative, where “the universe is replaced by parallel universes… It suggests that the space of all fiction, not just the postmodern variety, is ‘virtual reality’ – and this has been operational long before computer technology produced its more limited version”<br>
slide6. The multiverses of the Fletcher ‘Teams’ Felix’s ‘last assignment’ for the Fletcher players is for Team Ariel, Antonio, Gonzalo, Miranda and Hag-Seed to present and justify a vision for how these characters’ lives play out after the events of the play.
This imaginative rendering of ‘stories-beyond-the-play’ creates a multiverse of hypothetical narratives that frame the characters’ lives (beyond the play) in enlightening but also inevitably limited ways. There is much to be said for how these multiverses reflect the trappings of perspective yet the paradoxical freeing power of the storytelling mind, as well as for how they ‘converse’ and interact in their own fictional universe.<br>
slide7. Atwood’s multiverse – questions/activities Team Ariel’s version of events for Ariel’s character says a lot about how context shapes the ways in which stories are told and interpreted. How? Create your own future for Ariel, and have a peer/s assess how your ‘story-beyond-the-story is a product of context
Team Evil Bro Antonio’s hypothetical future for Antonio is bleak and very Machiavellian. Research what this means and explain how/why. What is Atwood’s intention here?
‘Team Miranda’ is very much an interjectory chapter, set up almost as a feminist reply to the patriarchal and Machiavellian narrative that Team Evil Bro Antonio plays out. Analyse how these chapters hold their own conversation within the novel. With Anne-Marie’s alternative future for Miranda in mind, consider ‘Hag-Seed’ as a whole from a feminist perspective
Consider how the ‘Team Gonzalo’ and ‘Team Hag-Seed’ chapters also hold a conversation within the novel. How are these stories products of perspective?
The ‘Team Prospero’ chapter effectively comes at the end of the novel, with Atwood’s portrayal of Felix’s life course post-play. How is Atwood choosing to end her conversation with Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ in the way that Felix’s life plays out. By including these many perspectives and alternative futures for the play’s characters, what is Atwood ultimately paying homage to?<br>
slide2. The Postmodern in ‘Hag-Seed’ John Berger: “Never again shall a single story be told as though it were the only one”
Unlike modernist literature, the postmodern rejects the notion of a text’s outright authority over meaning. Atwood’s ‘Hag-Seed’ can usefully be considered within a postmodern framework, especially with regard to what its conversation with ‘The Tempest’ reflects about textual authority, how meaning is made, and the purpose and nature of stories through time
Consider how Berger’s above quote reflects the literary conversation between ‘The Tempest’ and ‘Hag-Seed’ in terms of: ideas, styles, tropes & motifs, context, and the ‘telling’ of stories through time<br>
slide3. Intertextuality ‘Hag-Seed’ is an intertextual work at heart. The difficulty in discerning what is direct intertextuality, and what we the reader imply, makes the novel all the more postmodern
The arguably novel stands alone as its own narrative, but when read in the framework of its conversation with ‘The Tempest’, the allusions and intertextual transformations/subversions/diversions, are everywhere. Indeed, the more we read the book, the more we discover<br>
slide4. Poioumena ‘Poioumena’ refers to the use of a meta-fictive element in a text whereby the story itself becomes an account of the story being created/told (E.g. a book about the writing of the book)
In ‘Hag-Seed’, there is an element of poioumena in that the novel is centrally about the process of creating a play—of telling a story that has already been told, but which is being re-told for a new context, and in a very different world
This device also has another dimension in the context of these texts and their common story, for Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ is often read as a metaphorical reflection on his own process of creating plays and telling stories<br>
slide5. The hypothetical ‘multiverse’ Grmusa (2009) explains how postmodern works often “resist systematisation, and offer conclusions that are provisional and hypothetical, always liable to be overturned by yet another interpretation”
Nicol (2009) explains the common use of “multiverse” in postmodern narrative, where “the universe is replaced by parallel universes… It suggests that the space of all fiction, not just the postmodern variety, is ‘virtual reality’ – and this has been operational long before computer technology produced its more limited version”<br>
slide6. The multiverses of the Fletcher ‘Teams’ Felix’s ‘last assignment’ for the Fletcher players is for Team Ariel, Antonio, Gonzalo, Miranda and Hag-Seed to present and justify a vision for how these characters’ lives play out after the events of the play.
This imaginative rendering of ‘stories-beyond-the-play’ creates a multiverse of hypothetical narratives that frame the characters’ lives (beyond the play) in enlightening but also inevitably limited ways. There is much to be said for how these multiverses reflect the trappings of perspective yet the paradoxical freeing power of the storytelling mind, as well as for how they ‘converse’ and interact in their own fictional universe.<br>
slide7. Atwood’s multiverse – questions/activities Team Ariel’s version of events for Ariel’s character says a lot about how context shapes the ways in which stories are told and interpreted. How? Create your own future for Ariel, and have a peer/s assess how your ‘story-beyond-the-story is a product of context
Team Evil Bro Antonio’s hypothetical future for Antonio is bleak and very Machiavellian. Research what this means and explain how/why. What is Atwood’s intention here?
‘Team Miranda’ is very much an interjectory chapter, set up almost as a feminist reply to the patriarchal and Machiavellian narrative that Team Evil Bro Antonio plays out. Analyse how these chapters hold their own conversation within the novel. With Anne-Marie’s alternative future for Miranda in mind, consider ‘Hag-Seed’ as a whole from a feminist perspective
Consider how the ‘Team Gonzalo’ and ‘Team Hag-Seed’ chapters also hold a conversation within the novel. How are these stories products of perspective?
The ‘Team Prospero’ chapter effectively comes at the end of the novel, with Atwood’s portrayal of Felix’s life course post-play. How is Atwood choosing to end her conversation with Shakespeare’s ‘The Tempest’ in the way that Felix’s life plays out. By including these many perspectives and alternative futures for the play’s characters, what is Atwood ultimately paying homage to?<br>