Who Says? Holdstein & Aquiline, Chapter 10
Description: Who Says? Holdstein Aquiline, Chapter 10 Revising, presenting 1 Revising Dont forget, the writing process is recursive Higher-order concerns compare to my Grading Form: Try to react like a readeraudience member Thesis Support Focus
Related Topics
Download Presentation
"Who Says? Holdstein & Aquiline, Chapter 10" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Presentation Transcript
slide1. Who Says? Holdstein & Aquiline, Chapter 10
Revising, presenting 1<br>
slide2. Revising Don’t forget, the writing process is recursive
Higher-order concerns [compare to my Grading Form]:
Try to react like a reader/audience member
Thesis
Support
Focus
Transitions
Paragraphs [units w/conclusion] and logical development
Use of sources, quotes
Your role [don’t overdo it]
Conclusion [that restates thesis in more detail]
Appropriate language, tone [third person] 2<br>
slide3. Revising (cont.) Lower-order concerns [GSP, mainly; Q: What is “GSP”? Also use of APA citations]
Wait a bit for final edit; do it on paper [proofread]
Watch for sentences that you changed
Read the essay aloud
Read for specifics, e.g. just look at commas or just check in-text citations; don’t do it all at once
Peer review with a friend or classmate [similar list again on pp. 145-146]; note they me tion checking that all cites are in the Works Cited—you also need to check the reverse: if X is in the list mis X ever cited? 3<br>
slide4. Thesis This is central. Is it
A position on a yes/no, debatable, non-trivial question
Supported by your evidence
Narrow and focused [and perhaps in more than one part/answer, e.g. X is a significant problem mainly for people Y, although there are solutions available and it is declining in impact]
Of use in answering the “So what?” question 4<br>
slide5. Presentation Think of your audience (this class) and what they know about your topic
What tools will you use: Google Slides, PowerPoint, [Keynote (Apple)], Prezi, video, note cards, handouts; are you comfortable using them [e.g. going full screen, reversing]
Can you add something beyond what’s in your paper (often a video)
You’ll likely have research with data to present; decide what forms are appropriate:
Table (simple data)
Bar graph (for comparisons)
Pie chart (for parts of a whole)
Keep presentation simple [the 7/7/ rule: 7 words per line/bullet. 7 lines/bullets per slide. Don’t overdo images; give sources e.g. of videos; connect the dots between sources and your argument 5<br>
slide6. Final thoughts Look at the Grading Form “handout”; also list on pp. 142-143.
Make sure all items in the Works Cited list are actually cited in the paper, and all in-text citations are in the Works Cited list [check off as you read through]; include page numbers
[Appendix: There is a sample APA research paper, with abstract. It is quite sophisticated in its tone—textbooks usually present the best work they see, but pretend it’s merely typical. There are a few errors: p. 173 cites (Huitt, 2002) but the paper by Huitt is 2011; on p. 174 add (1943) after Maslow’s; on p. 179 it’s 2013, not 2012; on p. 180 add (1999) after names of researchers in first sentence; page numbers in cites don’t match list; some References should have a publisher, most scholarly ones lack a DOI, some errors in italicizing, Rynes et al. entry is incomplete; but all in the list are cited, and all cited are in the list!] 6<br>
Revising, presenting 1<br>
slide2. Revising Don’t forget, the writing process is recursive
Higher-order concerns [compare to my Grading Form]:
Try to react like a reader/audience member
Thesis
Support
Focus
Transitions
Paragraphs [units w/conclusion] and logical development
Use of sources, quotes
Your role [don’t overdo it]
Conclusion [that restates thesis in more detail]
Appropriate language, tone [third person] 2<br>
slide3. Revising (cont.) Lower-order concerns [GSP, mainly; Q: What is “GSP”? Also use of APA citations]
Wait a bit for final edit; do it on paper [proofread]
Watch for sentences that you changed
Read the essay aloud
Read for specifics, e.g. just look at commas or just check in-text citations; don’t do it all at once
Peer review with a friend or classmate [similar list again on pp. 145-146]; note they me tion checking that all cites are in the Works Cited—you also need to check the reverse: if X is in the list mis X ever cited? 3<br>
slide4. Thesis This is central. Is it
A position on a yes/no, debatable, non-trivial question
Supported by your evidence
Narrow and focused [and perhaps in more than one part/answer, e.g. X is a significant problem mainly for people Y, although there are solutions available and it is declining in impact]
Of use in answering the “So what?” question 4<br>
slide5. Presentation Think of your audience (this class) and what they know about your topic
What tools will you use: Google Slides, PowerPoint, [Keynote (Apple)], Prezi, video, note cards, handouts; are you comfortable using them [e.g. going full screen, reversing]
Can you add something beyond what’s in your paper (often a video)
You’ll likely have research with data to present; decide what forms are appropriate:
Table (simple data)
Bar graph (for comparisons)
Pie chart (for parts of a whole)
Keep presentation simple [the 7/7/ rule: 7 words per line/bullet. 7 lines/bullets per slide. Don’t overdo images; give sources e.g. of videos; connect the dots between sources and your argument 5<br>
slide6. Final thoughts Look at the Grading Form “handout”; also list on pp. 142-143.
Make sure all items in the Works Cited list are actually cited in the paper, and all in-text citations are in the Works Cited list [check off as you read through]; include page numbers
[Appendix: There is a sample APA research paper, with abstract. It is quite sophisticated in its tone—textbooks usually present the best work they see, but pretend it’s merely typical. There are a few errors: p. 173 cites (Huitt, 2002) but the paper by Huitt is 2011; on p. 174 add (1943) after Maslow’s; on p. 179 it’s 2013, not 2012; on p. 180 add (1999) after names of researchers in first sentence; page numbers in cites don’t match list; some References should have a publisher, most scholarly ones lack a DOI, some errors in italicizing, Rynes et al. entry is incomplete; but all in the list are cited, and all cited are in the list!] 6<br>