PPT-Examining tradeoffs in household decision-making for sustainable intensification
Author : walsh | Published Date : 2023-10-31
Robert B Richardson Nathan Brugnone Michele T Hockett David L Ortega Timothy Silberg and Kurt Waldman MSU East Africa Learning Lab August 8 2016 OVERVIEW Research
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Examining tradeoffs in household decisio..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Examining tradeoffs in household decision-making for sustainable intensification: Transcript
Robert B Richardson Nathan Brugnone Michele T Hockett David L Ortega Timothy Silberg and Kurt Waldman MSU East Africa Learning Lab August 8 2016 OVERVIEW Research objective Examine tradeoffs in household decisionmaking for sustainable intensification. SYSTEMS. Decision Support Software. Reasons for the growth of decision-making information systems. People need to analyze large amounts of information. People must make decisions quickly. People must apply sophisticated analysis techniques, such as modeling and forecasting, to make good decisions. Household decision-making. Ruth . Tarrant. “The family is a remarkable institution. And a complex one. Indeed, so complex that much of economic theory proceeds as if no such thing exists”. Sen. , A. (1984) . Chapter 1. Introduction . to Managerial Decision Making. Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons. The Anatomy of Decisions. Judgments involve cognition.. Common decision situations:. How to select a post-MBA job?. Household decision-making. Ruth . Tarrant. “The family is a remarkable institution. And a complex one. Indeed, so complex that much of economic theory proceeds as if no such thing exists”. Sen. , A. (1984) . Prof. Dr. . . Y. İlker TOPCU. www.ilkertopcu.. net. . www.. ilkertopcu. .org. . www.. ilkertopcu. .. info. facebook.com/. yitopcu. . twitter.com/. yitopcu. instagram.com/. yitopcu. Credits: 3+0. Anne Dansey . . Senior Policy Analyst. . Animal Industries Policy . . . . Shifting . to Climate Smart Agriculture: ESIA and Other . Tools. . 5 April . 2017. Yarra. River: tranquil, peaceful with native plants and natural flows. SYSTEMS. Decision Support Software. Reasons for the growth of decision-making information systems. People need to analyze large amounts of information. People must make decisions quickly. People must apply sophisticated analysis techniques, such as modeling and forecasting, to make good decisions. Lauren . Reinerman. -Jones, Grace . Teo. , and . Avonie. Parchment. “Why do leaders fail? They make poor choices that lead to bad decisions. And in some cases they compound bad decision upon bad decision. You cannot separate leadership from . System of Decision Making. Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making . Instructor: John Miyamoto. 11/02/2017: Lecture 06-2. Note: This . Powerpoint. presentation . may contain . macros that I wrote to help me create the slides. . Learning Outcomes. Identify the steps in the decision-making process. Describe various models of decision making. Discuss the individual influences that affect decision making. Explain how groups make decisions. Decision . Making Styles. Planful. – A step-by-step process is used to identify alternatives and to choose one.. Painful – A lot of time and energy are spent, but a choice is not made.. Impulsive – A choice is made without adequately finding alternatives or collecting information about the self and alternatives.. Statin Choice Decision Aid Share-Decision Making SCIP Shared Decision Making Shared Decision Making Glasziou and Haynes ACP JC 2005 Promote a process where patients and clinicians make a choice together. Rohan Fox and Christopher Hoy. Photo credit: . Kahunapule. Michael John, . flickr. creative commons. 2 . l. arge . scale surveys. Morobe. /Madang (2014). 688 total respondents. 301 women in male headed households. Neil Harrison. University of Sussex. Formerly: Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience . & Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging. Multiple decision making systems. What happens when one or other breaks down?.
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Examining tradeoffs in household decision-making for sustainable intensification"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents