/
ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA

ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA - PowerPoint Presentation

yoshiko-marsland
yoshiko-marsland . @yoshiko-marsland
Follow
387 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-12

ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA - PPT Presentation

IN COMMUNITIES Week 13 Terminal USA Pathology as Authenticity Topics ITVS Independent Television Services Positive vs negative images Authenticity Satire camp parody Abjection ID: 558574

asian american usa terminal american asian terminal usa film itvs positive

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIAIN COMMUNITIES

Week 13: Terminal USA – Pathology as AuthenticitySlide2

Topics:

ITVS (Independent Television Services)

“Positive” vs “negative” images

Authenticity

Satire, camp, parody

AbjectionSlide3

ITVS was founded in1989, through the Public Broadcast Act of 1988

Unlike the

Program Fund, ITVS was completely controlled by independent

producers. (Coalition of Independent Public Broadcasting Producers) Okada calls it “different and experimental.” (p. 66)It began with 6 million dollars funding from CPB, which it can use to fund productions without creative or editorial input from CPB or PBS

ITVSSlide4

In its first year, ITVS nearly went banrupt

“Too avant-garde”?

It offers “A

chance for Asian American filmmakers to address the problem of ‘positive image’” according to OkadaITVS today – see web siteSlide5

“In the context of Asian American film and video, the broadcast of Jon Moritsugu’s short film Terminal USA on one of ITVS’s first programs for PBS, TV Families, especially offered the possibility of a productive discourse on race and representation on television. By virtue of its incisive, sardonic critique of Asian American stereotypes,

Terminal USA

mobilized the “negative image” as a more authentic pathway toward an Asian American film and video aesthetics.” (p. 55-56)Slide6

Framed within a larger debate around “positive” and “negative” images on television:

Model minority

myth

The Cosby Show – case study from African Americans on TVA productive “negative image” (e.g. Eve Oishi’s “Bad Asians”) All-American Girl & Terminal USASlide7

Aired in 1994 

Based on Margaret Cho’s

Stand-up comedy

Only ran for one season Cho said, in her concert film I’m the One That I Want (2000,Dir. Lionel Coleman), that her experience on the show was “a nightmare,” and led to her anxiety, depression and hospitalization

All-American GirlSlide8

Enlightened racism?

“…audiences

were either grateful for a ‘positive’ portrayal of Asian Americans or they hated the show’s kowtowing to white stereotypes of Asians.” (p. 62

)“The reason why Cho became a stand-up star was because she figured out that the formula for authenticity, as an Asian American, was to be bad.” (p. 62)Slide9

“If the fantasy of The Cosby Show occurred in its unproblematic display of black upward mobility as an escape from black stereotypes, the fantasy of

All-American Girl

would have been more effective if it had articulated a narrative of escape from stereotypes about Asian Americans, that is, “model minority” status.” (p. 64)Slide10

In 1992, Moritsugu was given $9,000 to

develop a script for

the one of the first

ITVS programs TV Families – “a program that satirized network television sitcoms and dramas and ‘serialized family

diversity as an antidote to network

television’s one

dimensional paradigm.’” (p. 68

)

The resultant script was awarded a $360,000 production budget

Terminal USASlide11

Terminal USA remains Moritsugu’s most “big-budget” film. It won awards at film festivals, but was also rejected by a number of local PBS stations. It only screened in 150 out of 210 markets nationwide

His other films include

Sleazy

Rider (1988), Hippy Porn (1991), Mod Fuck Explosion (1994), Fame Whore (1997), Scumrock

(2002

), and

Pig Death Machine

(2013

). All are made on a shoe-string budget and screened at underground and Asian American film festivals.Slide12

Okada compares Terminal USA to

All-American Girl

, and comments on Moritsugu’s use of the abject to “provide n effective window into expressions that have hitherto been disallowed—in network TV, public television, or other ‘legitimate’ space.” (p. 70

)“As ‘failures,’ then, both Moritsugu and Cho successfully saw through to the inevitable trajectory of Asian American expression on stage and screen.” (p. 70)Slide13

“Rather than using injury as a path to recognition, as that which seeks to be looked at, Terminal USA uses the physical abject as a way of challenging a kind of filmmaking that requires recognition as a prerequisite. By pushing the envelope in this way,

Terminal USA

raises many of the critical issues of his stance as a non–Asian American filmmaker. In this way, the value of

Terminal USA, and thus ITVS’s investment in innovative content, can be linked productively to a politics of resistance against the positive/negative conundrum of racial representation in television.” (p. 78)Slide14

Divide into groups of 2-3 students from your media event groups

Select 1-2 works from the program you are working with (AAIM pool or 2016 LAAPFF line-up)

Create an analysis modeled after Okada’s analysis of All-American Girl and Terminal USA, focusing on how your selected work(s) address the on-going debates of “positive”

Film / Video Analysis: “Positive” vs “Negative”

ImagesSlide15

And “negative” media representation of Asian Americans.

Prepare a presentation for the next class: 10-15 mins. including clip(s) up to 5 mins.

Some questions your group may consider:

Are what you are seeing “positive” or “negative” representations of Asian Americans? Or are they more complex or contradictory images – think satire, parody, camps, Kristeva’s theory of the abject? Slide16

Are discussions of negative/positive images useful in our current

mediascape

?

How has our contemporary social, political, and cultural climate influenced these debates around representation?