Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the European Union Sixth Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights Selected Topics on Cultural and Legal Pluralism in IP Law organized by ID: 241544
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Diversity versus Unity:" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Diversity versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the European Union
Sixth Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights Selected Topics on Cultural and Legal Pluralism in IP Law organized bythe World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the Faculty of Law, Hebrew University of JerusalemGeneva, May 29 to 31, 2012
Franciska
Schönherr
PhD Candidate and Research Assistant Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI)
University of Strasbourg, FranceSlide2
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the EU
I. Diversity versus unity in EU copyright law - defining the problem
The
current legal framework: partial
harmonisation
of national laws
EU’s method: approximation of laws by (mainly) sectorial directives
Interpretation by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU)
Underlying motivation: respect of Member States’ diversity
Different legal traditions, approaches
Competence issues
Result: no unified legal framework, incoherence
On the practical level: lack of legal certainty, cross-border transactions complicated, no completed “digital internal market”Slide3
Diversity versus unity in EU copyright law - defining the problem - continued
Conclusion: a more coherent, transparent legal framework is neededNeed for:More unity enhancing transparency
Flexibility, allowing for adaptation to new contexts and respect for diversity
Challenge of translating these conflicting/complementary imperatives into policy choices
How far should “unification” go?
Which legal instruments would best consolidate the tension between unity and diversity?How would such choices impact on the thematic aspects of EU copyright law?
Diversity versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the EUSlide4
II. Attempts to increase unity: the project of EU-wide codification of copyright law Tendency
?Communication of the European Commission of 24 May 2011: possible project of EU-wide “codification”Codification as consolidation of the EU acquis?Judicial activity of the CJEUGeneral tendency of “Europeanization” of private lawProposal of academia: The European Copyright Code of the Wittem group
How could/should such a project be implemented?
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide5
III. Accommodating unity in diversity: implications for policy choices
EU-wide codification of copyright law: a project under constructionChoices relating both to possible form and contents of a “code” need to be considered carefullyPossibilities of “codification”:
Consolidation of the EU
acquis
– optimisation of the
acquis?Allows for a higher degree of diversityPossible in the short term?Replacement of national laws through an EU copyright law
High degree of unity, legal certainty, transparency
Direct horizontal effect of a regulation’s provisions under certain conditions
3. European Commission's suggestion: an “optional ‘unitary’ copyright title”
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide6
IV. An “optional ‘unitary’ copyright title” – towards a two-tier system of EU and national copyright law?
“optional” – a soft law approach?Uncertainty about actual effectsAn optional “title” – to be bound to some kind of formalities?
An optional “regime” – to be chosen, e.g., in the framework of transactions?
Example of the Commission’s proposal for a regulation on an optional common European sales law (COM(2011) 635 final), area of contract law
Advantages of a second set of optional rules: e.g., respect of principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, legal certainty
Is the European Commission considering a two-tier approach?
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide7
An “optional ‘unitary’ copyright title” – towards a two-tier system of EU and national copyright law? - continued
Options and opportunities of a two-tier approachDivision by subject matter: idea of a two-tier system within a specific field of law Different degrees of protection, example of databases, see e.g., Annette Kur
, 2012
Division by territory: idea of a two-tier system distinguishing the national/EU level
Trademark and design law: different regimes, different territorial scope of protection
Justification: differing needs as to the scope of protection Applicability to the idea of an optional EU wide title?
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide8
An “optional ‘unitary’ copyright title” – towards a two-tier system of EU and national copyright law? – continued
Applicability to the idea of an optional EU wide title?Example:National level: “classic” subject matter, low or no cross-border dimension, high degree of diversity
Continuation of the current approach: approximation where justified by imperatives of the EU internal market
EU
level: “new” subject matter, cross-border dimension preponderant, transactions in online
environment, less need to respect diversity, increased costs and complexity See, e.g., Marco
Ricolfi
, 2012 (forthcoming): “opt-in” for broader protection, “
creative
commons by default” “Optional regime”: extensive, detailed study necessary to determine needs of stakeholders and markets.
Certain problems need to be solved in the short term, e.g., the issue of limitations to copyright law.
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide9
V. Outlook on future activity relating to the contents of copyright law in the EU
Wittem Code: “main aspects” of most copyright systems coveredPerspective: short, medium, or long term?
Starting point: the EU
acquis
– consolidation, improvement , and completion
Orientation/“fil rouge“? Idem as for form – accommodation of both unity and diversity/flexibilityThe example of exceptions and limitations to copyright law: current system insufficient, neither flexible nor transparent (e.g., Martin Senftleben, 2010)
Proposal of the European Copyright Code: a closed list of limitations combined with an opening clause
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EUSlide10
Thank you for your attention!
Comments and suggestions are very welcome: franciska.schonherr@ceipi.edu
Diversity
versus Unity: Reflections on the Future of Copyright Law in the
EU