In Re Gault Julie Martinez Block 2 Neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone In Regards to Gault Argued Tuesday December 6 1966 Decided Monday May 5 1967 Facts and Case Summary In Re Gault USCOURTSGOV United States Court nd Web 28 Oct 2013 ID: 766715
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "In Re Gault Julie Martinez" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
In Re Gault Julie Martinez Block 2
“Neither the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone”
In Regards to Gault Argued Tuesday, December 6, 1966 Decided Monday, May 5, 1967 "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Summary Gerald Gault (15) was arrested for making an obscene phone call No notice given to parents Sent to reform school until he was 21 "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Public Policy Juveniles over 14 tried as adults Juveniles did not receive Due P rocess Friedman, Benjamin E. "Protecting Truth: An Argument for Juvenile Rights and a Return to In Re Gault." UCLA Law Review. UCLA Law Review, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Arguments of Plaintiff Gault represented by Mr. Norman Dorsen Arizona Juvenile Court was unconstitutional Gault was denied procedural rights IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_116>.
Argument of Defendant Arizona defended by Mr. Frank A. Parks Juvenile be treated like an adult Opportunity to avoid self incrimination would interfere with investigation IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_116>.
Third Party Amicus Curiae Briefs American Parents Committee four Gault Merritt W. Green for the Ohio Association of Juvenile Court Judges Urged affirmance IN RE GAULT. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 22 October 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_116>.
Supreme C ourt R uling 8 to 1 in favor of Gault Case violated 14 th Amendment Court failed to meet child’s best interest Precedent- Granted juveniles procedural rights "Facts and Case Summary: In Re Gault." USCOURTS.GOV. United States Court, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.
Dissenting Opinion Mr. Justice Stewart Juvenile proceedings are not criminal trials Juvenile court and criminal court have opposite missions http://www.csustan.edu/cj/jjustice/CaseFiles/In-re-Gault.pdf
Long Term Effects Every juvenile case afterwards was changed Juveniles must be given Due Process Patton, William W. "HISTORY OF JUVENILE COURTS." StateUniversity.com. State University, n.d. Web. 28 Oct. 2013.