Pei Wang Research Assistant at Goldenson Center Nicholas Frei Actuarial Analyst at Sun Life Financial Revolutionizing Our View of Longevity Table of Contents Motivation Engineering Applications ID: 650430
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Modeling Healthy Life Expectancy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Modeling Healthy Life Expectancy
Pei Wang, Research Assistant at Goldenson CenterNicholas Frei, Actuarial Analyst at Sun Life Financial
Revolutionizing Our View of LongevitySlide2
Table of Contents
MotivationEngineering
Applications
Conclusion
2Slide3
1. Motivation
3Longevity
Modern Challenges
Healthy Life ExpectancySlide4
Longevity
Fascination with immortality, death and everything in betweenWhat is the upper limit?4Slide5
Modern Challenges5
Health careFinancial Security
Cognitive Disabilities
Long-Term Care
2.7% of Americans have a healthy lifestyle consisting of exercise, nutrition, healthy BMI and not smoking.
70% of Americans are worried about
retirement.Slide6
Healthy Life Expectancy
6
Life Expectancy
ULE
HLESlide7
A New Solution
Healthy Life Expectancy is a positive new spin on looking at longevityThe HLE ToolkitModeling the ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ portions of someone’s life equips us to tackle the modern challenges we’ve mentionedAlternative methods to approaching healthy living, financial advice, and underwriting
7Slide8
2. Engineering
8DefinitionsAssumptions
HLE Model
Example calculation
sSlide9
Definitions
Some definitions from the HLE model:9
Termination from a healthy state occurs by death or disability
Disability uses a long term care definition, which is the inability to perform some of the activities of daily living
The only exit from disability is death
Cognitive Adjusted ULE (Conditional on the disability being cognitive in nature)Slide10
Assumptions
Healthy attained age mortality ratesUses first year select SOA mortality ratesIncidence rates of disabilityBased on SOA long term care incidence ratesAttained age mortality rates for Non-cognitive disabled lives
Based on SOA RP 2014 mortality rates for disabled livesAttained age mortality rates for Cognitive disabled lives
Based on
regular SOA annuity mortality rates
Personal information – gender, age, smoker status, exercise and dietary habits, body mass index, income, education level, marital status, sleep
habits
10Slide11
HLE Model – Flow Chart
11
Healthy
Healthy
Dead
Dead
Unhealthy
Year 2
Year 1
Year 1
Year 2
Dead
Year 3
Healthy
Y1
Y2
Y3
…Slide12
HLE Model – Formulas
12
=
P
(Healthy life
(x)
stays healthy and dies in the coming year)
=
P
(Healthy life
(x)
gets disabled at the start of the year)
=
P
(Disabled life
(x)
dies in the coming year)
Then
=
P
(Healthy life
(x)
dies between
x+k
and x+k+1
)
=
(1 -
)
+
[
k-t|
Slide13
HLE Model – Validation of Formulas
Independently evaluated HLE, ULE and LE with separate formulas and one test was to ensure LE = HLE + ULEAdditional validation using Monte Carlo simulations with actuarial assumption inputs to reproduce
the analytically developed calculationsMonte Carlo simulations had the added benefit of providing a distribution of realized HLE’s
Quantiles
of HLE distribution used to develop adjustment factors for input actuarial assumptions based on personal data
13Slide14
Example Inputs14Slide15
Example Calculations
Male 60, non-smoker, 5 ft 10in, 230 lbsRarely exercises; < 5 hours sleep; 3-7 drinks per week
Graduate and annual earnings > $100,000Diet and state of health fair
Output
HLE =
19.2
years
ULE =
2.7
years
Cognitive adjusted ULE = 6
.4
years
Relative HLE =
79.1%
15
Male 60, non-smoker, 5
ft
10in,
180
lbs
Exercises 3
-
4 days per week; >
8 hours
sleep; 2 to 3 drinks per week
Graduate and annual earnings >
$
100,000
Diet and state of health very good
Output
HLE =
27.4
years
ULE =
2.3
years
Cognitive adjusted ULE =
4.2
years
Relative HLE =
112.8%
VSSlide16
3. Applications16
Wellness ToolIndividual Financial Planning
Underwriting
Health Care Cost Estimation
Long Term Care Design and PricingSlide17
Wellness Tool
HLE is not carved in stone for an individualProactive lifestyle changes (exercise, diet, sleep, etc.) can have a significant impact on HLE (and ULE)Easy to understand and communicate that increasing HLE increases an individual’s quality of life
The new “step-counter” app
17Slide18
Individual Financial Planning
Annual retirement spending should not be level across the expected lifetime of an individualDuring the HLE period, retirement spending can be maximized subject to a given level of annual basic expenses
During ULE period, basic expenses are expected to increase but discretionary expenses will be significantly reducedIncorporating HLE and ULE in a financial planning model will significantly change optimal spending patterns
The HLE framework can provide guidance on what type of product (annuity, long-term care etc.) makes the most sense
18Slide19
Financial Planning - Illustrative Example
Assume initial assets of $1.5M, i = 6%, HLE = 22 years and ULE = 8 yearsAssume p.v. of basic expenses = 20% of initial assetsAssume basic expenses are double over ULE period and there are no discretionary expenses
19Slide20
Financial Planning - Illustrative Example
Financial planning not based on HLE:Annual spending over LE of 30 years approximately $103,000Financial planning model based on HLE:Annual spending over HLE approximately $112,000
Annual spending over ULE approximately $41,000Additional annual discretionary spending is $9,000 or approximately $750 of additional monthly spending
20Slide21
Underwriting
The creation of a model which can explicitly measure HLE and demonstrate the impact of lifestyle practices on HLE can add more rigor to current simplified underwriting practices:Model results can be obtained in real time
HLE relative index can be used to differentiate between high and low risk individuals
21Slide22
Health Care Cost Estimation
The HLE model can be enhanced to incorporate more detailed lifestyle and dietary details and serve as a patient screening tool for medical providersThe enhanced HLE relative index could be used to develop risk classes for patients and be incorporated into a health care cost predictive model22Slide23
Long Term Care Design and Pricing
An HLE deferred life annuity for a limited duration of ULE years could be used as a substitute or to complement a long term care policy purchaseLTC policies could be designed as a deferred limited duration coverage product based on HLE and ULE estimates at underwritingThe cognitive-adjusted ULE could be used to estimate the additional costs incurred arising from a cognitive disability in LTC
23Slide24
4. Conclusion24
The HLE perspectiveLimitationsNext Steps
AcknowledgementsSlide25
The HLE Perspective25
Quantifying “quality of life”Emphasis on a healthy lifestyleApplications in health, financial planning, long term care and underwritingSlide26
Limitations
Underlying mortality ratesPossible recovery from disabilitiesCurrent factors and assumptions can be refinedMore factors can be included
26Slide27
Next Steps
27 Many open research questions are available on how to incorporate more rigor on explicitly measuring lifestyle changes on
HLE
Nutritional and medical professional input
Immediate
next step by the
Goldenson
Center is to develop a web-based application that will be available to the public
to
measure individual HLE Slide28
Acknowledgements
28
Advisor: Jay
Vadiveloo
Team Members:
Nicholas
Frei
Jay
Krutiak
Cory Wang
Pei Wang
Yanhan
Wang
John PotterSlide29
Questions?