PPT-Negating Nested Quantifiers

More examples student is enrolled in class   1 Someone in your class has an Internet connection but has not chatted with anyone else in the class 2 There are two students in the class who between them have chatted with everyone else in the class. Nested Quantifiers. Needed to express statements with multiple variables . Example 1. : “. x+y. = . y+x. for all real numbers” . . xy. (. x+y. = . y+x. ) . where the domains of . x. and . Goals. : . Explain . how to work with nested . quantifiers. S. how that . the order . of quantification . matters. . Work . with . logical . expressions involving multiple . quantifiers.. Copyright © . Logic and Proof. Fall . 2011. Sukumar Ghosh. Predicate Logic. Propositional logic has limitations. Consider this:. Is . x. . > 3. a proposition? No, it is a . predicate. . Call it . P(x. ). . The pictures describe an incident. Write sentences based on the pictures and words given. You must add your own words to make the story interesting. Brainstorm the verbs for each of the picture. taxi driver – passenger – airport – Noir Hotel. Propositional Logic Not Enough. Given the statements: . “All men are mortal.”. “Socrates is a man.”. It follows that “Socrates is mortal.”. This can’t be represented in propositional logic. . A. n. v. e. s. h. . K. o. murave. l. l. i. work done at Carnegie Mellon University. Joint work with . Nikolaj. . Bjørner. , . Arie. . Gurfinkel. , and Kenneth McMillan. In essence…. 1. Efficiently under-approximating projections,. What . is your quantifier quotient (QQ)?. Barbara . Zurer. . Pearson. bpearson@research.umass.edu. University of Massachusetts . Amherst. Language Acquisition . Colloquium. Background. This work is part of the preliminary studies for an . Goals. : . Explain . how to work with nested . quantifiers. S. how that . the order . of quantification . matters. . Work . with . logical . expressions involving multiple . quantifiers.. Copyright © . if. Lesson. CS1313 Spring 2017. 1. Nested. . if. . Lesson Outline. Nested. if. Lesson . Outline. A Complicated . if. Example #1. A Complicated . if. Example #2. A Complicated . if. Example #3. Satisfiability. Modulo Theories . Frontiers . of . Computational Reasoning . 2009 . –. MSR Cambridge. Leonardo de Moura. Microsoft Research. Symbolic Reasoning. Quantifiers in . Satisfiability. Sarah E. Cusson. 1. , Marcel P. Georgin. 2. , Ethan T. Dale. 1. , . Vira. Dhaliwal. 1,. and Alec D. Gallimore. 1. 1. Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan; . 2. Applied Physics Program, University of Michigan . Section 1.4. Section Summary. Predicates . Variables. Quantifiers. Universal Quantifier. Existential Quantifier. Negating Quantifiers. De Morgan’s Laws for Quantifiers. Translating English to Logic. Lecture 5. Predicate Logic. Spring 2013. 1. Announcements. Reading assignments. Predicates and Quantifiers. 1.4, 1.5 7. th. Edition. 1.3, 1.4 6. th. . Edition. Hand in Homework 1 now. Homework 2 is available on the website. Modulo Theories . Manchester 2009. Leonardo de Moura. Microsoft Research. Symbolic Reasoning. Quantifiers in . Satisfiability. Modulo Theories. PSpace. -complete. (QBF). Undecidable. (First-order logic).