PPT-A mixed-methods comparative case study evaluation of a Community Health Worker pilot in

Presentation Structure Research project overview Evaluation overview Alignment to the ARC HIAT Public Patient Involvement Challenges successes amp opportunities Andrew Riley University of Liverpool. Program Evaluation”. Presented by Tom Chapel. Thomas J. Chapel, MA, MBA Tchapel@cdc.gov. Chief Evaluation Officer 404-639-2116. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Agenda. This case study describes competing activist campaigns triggered by a provocative poster promoting safe gay sex, which became one of the most complained-about outdoor advertisements in Australia. Dr John . Gerring. . Definitions. Unit . A spatially bounded phenomenon observed at a single point in time or over some time period. Case. Comprised of several variables, each built upon an observation. Day 3 Mixed Methods. Prof. Donna M. Mertens. Gallaudet University. Almaty. , Kazakhstan. July 2011. Three days together. IPEN Almaty Kazakhstan July 2011 Mertens Mixed Methods. Day 1: What is the role of the evaluator?. Community Paramedics in N.D., Why?. Inconsistent Access to Healthcare in State. Insufficient providers at all levels. Disparity between urban and rural . N.D. .. Diminishing Volunteer EMS staffing. Low Volume – Critical Placement of EMS Services. Webinars. Social . and Behavioral . Sciences. Lisa Ulmer, . S. cD. , . MSW. Professor, Department of Community Health & Prevention. Drexel University School of Public Health. Thursday 29 January . Presented by Tom Chapel. Thomas J. Chapel, MA, MBA Tchapel@cdc.gov. Chief Evaluation Officer 404-639-2116. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Agenda. 1. The why . and how . Objectives. To . identify the advantages and disadvantages of employing multiple research methods;. To consider those factors that influence the choice of research method and sequence of the multiple methods;. Advanced Methods Webinars: Integrating Mixed Methods in Health Services and Delivery System Research Presenters: Benjamin Crabtree, PhD Michael K. Magill, MD Debra L. Scammon, PhD Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel, MHA, PhD(c) April 2015. The Evaluation Team. Consortium lead – Overall . e. valuation lead and contract management. High profile evaluation (incl. scoping), research. . and cost effectiveness.. Experience of evaluations of mental health, community and skills . A mixed methods study involves the collection or analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data in a single study in which the data are collected concurrently or sequentially, are given a priority, and involve the integration of the data at one or more stages in the process of research. . InterAction with 31nancial support from the Rockefeller Foundation The other notes in this series are Introduction to Impact Evaluation Linking Monitoring Evaluation to Impact Evaluation and Use of I Severe Malaria Stakeholder meeting. Virtual meeting – 8-9 February 202. 2. Dr Seynabou GAYE. - . SENEGAL - . Country . overview. Districts mettant en œuvre RAS. Rectal . artesunate. . coverage. 2014 pilot in 2 districts in . GIZ evaluation workshop. 14-16 October 2014. Kampala, Uganda. Day Three. Glenn O’Neil. Workshop . schedule. Day 3. : . Communication in evaluation – in practice . Recap. of . day. 2. What do you recall? .