Resolution 13 Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee DTAC Committee November 1213 2014 June 2013 US Public Health Service released new PHS Guideline that now include Hepatitis B HBV and Hepatitis C HCV in addition to HIV ID: 932108
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Align OPTN Policies with the 2013 PHS Gu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Align OPTN Policies with the 2013 PHS Guideline for Reducing Transmission of HIV, HBV, and HCV Through Solid Organ Transplantation(Resolution 13)
Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) Committee
November 12-13, 2014
Slide2June 2013- US Public Health Service released new PHS Guideline that now include Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) in addition to HIVThe Final Rule, §121.4 (OPTN policies: Secretarial review and appeals
.)
notes that the OPTN Board is responsible for developing policies consistent with recommendations of the CDC to test potential organ donors and follow transplant recipients to prevent the spread of infectious disease. Current policies are not consistent with new PHS Guideline
The Problem
Slide3Strategic
Plan
Slide4Align OPTN policy with 2013 PHS Guideline to meet Final Rule requirementsEnhance transplant recipient and living donor safety through updates to donor and recipient testing, informed consent, and vessel storage
Goal of the Proposal
Slide5OPOs
Tx
HospitalsLD Recovery ProgramsStore samples for serology
and
NAT for 10 yrs
Develop
and implement written protocol for post-tx testing for
HIV/HBV/HCV
(unless + pre-tx)Complete testing for the HIV/HBV/HCV as close to organ recovery as possible but <28 daysNo donor med/soc = increased riskClarify informed consent policies - 15.3HIV NAT or Ag/Ab combo for increased risk donorsHIV NAT or Ag/Ab combo for increased risk donorsCannot store HCV Ab or NAT pos or HBsAg or NAT pos extra vesselsHCV NAT for ALL donorsHCV NAT for ALL donors
How Proposal Achieves its Goals
Slide6HIV, HBV, and HCV NAT data collection fields in DonorNet® for deceased organ donors
Fields must display on
DonorNet® and DonorNet® mobileSerologies tab where they will reside renamed “Viral Detection”HBV and HCV NAT screening criteria all organ match runs for all organs for deceased and living donorsAdds fields to the Waiting List for candidatesHIV, HBV, and HCV NAT data collection fields in Tiedi (Transplant Recipient Registration)
Additional NAT fields on LDR/DDR already being implemented as part of OMB project
Programming Includes:
Slide7OPTN Committees
Professional Societies
Government Ex OfficioDTACAOPOHRSA
Living Donor
AST
FDA
OPO
ASTS
Operations & SafetyNATCOJoint Subcommittee CompositionSRTR invited, but did not participate. Representatives received all emails and open invite to attend as desired.
Slide8Joint Subcommittee completing comprehensive review of Guideline’s 34 recommendations to determine:Is the PHS recommendation covered by the Final Rule?Is there policy already in place to address this? Does it need to be changed?
Should there be policy in place to address this, or should it remain a PHS recommendations
?Proposal Development
Slide9Strong agreement on addressing the 34 PHS recommendations and subsections within joint subcommittee and DTAC with one exceptionSplit vote on this topic from both groups…
HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT)
for ALL organ donorsCommittee unanimously supported HIV and HCV NAT for increased risk donors, but could not come to agreement on
universal
HCV NAT
Proposal Development
Slide10The Final Rule, §121.4, notes that the OPTN Board of Directors is responsible for developing policies that are consistent with recommendations
of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to
test potential organ donors and following transplant recipients to prevent the spread of infectious disease. Why is this an issue?
Slide11Public Comment Response Tally
Type of Response
Response Total
In Favor
In
Favor as Amended
Opposed
No Vote/
No Comment/ Did Not ConsiderIndividual29
22 (76%)
0
5
(17%)
2
Regional
11
10 (91%)
1
(9%)
0
0
Committee196 (32%)01 (5%)12
Public Comment Feedback
Slide12Professional Society Feedback
Slide13Several themes arose in reviewing feedback, and are outlined in detail on page 45 of the briefing paper, Exhibit A ,in the DTAC’s board report.
Comment Themes
Slide14Issues
Raised
DTAC CommentsDesire for standardization of NAT across platformsGuidance on how to proceed with initial positive (e.g. Triplex)
How to proceed with possible false positive tests
Challenging, but outside of OPTN purview.
Thresholds for
pos
test results are set by industry and FDA.
OPOs and tx centers should work closely with their labs and carefully review FDA guidance, testing package insertsNAT Concerns
Slide15Issues
Raised
DTAC CommentsConcerns related to access to NAT in some donor service areas. Could a NAT requirement lead to delayed donation or lost donors?Most OPOs have capacity to perform NATA variety of process issues could result in delayed or lost donors
NAT Concerns
Slide16YearHIV NAT
HBV NAT
HCV NAT200844/58 (76%)20/58 (34%)40/58 (69%)201056/57 (98%)43/57 (75%)55/57 (97%)OPO NAT Survey ResultsOPOs performing NAT for screening of potential deceased organ donors
OPOs performing NAT for screening of
all
potential deceased organ donor, regardless of risk status
Year
HIV NAT
HBV NATHCV NAT200830/58 (52%)14/58 (24%)28/58 (48%)201039/57 (68%)30/57 (53%)39/57 (68%)
Slide17Issues
Raised
DTAC CommentsIncreased false positives in low prevalence population with organ wastage (e.g. pediatric donors)OPO Committee supported universal HCV NAT, suggesting:danger in assuming that a sub-group of potential donors be assumed as “no increased risk” and allow for exemption from testing requirements.
Final Rule does not
allow for the exclusion of any specific group
NAT Concerns
Slide18Proportion of false positives depends on incidence in populationFurther testing to clarify initial results rarely practical in deceased donors
Labs and test package inserts report an
extremely low incidence of false positive rates. 9179 NAT (HIV/HCV) runs in organ or tissue donors0.9% initially reactive but not repeatable0.04% reactive but not discriminated0.001% inhibitors and could not be amplified3 (0.03%) NAT reactive and seronegative
for HIV-1, HCV
False positive NAT results
Personal communication, Marek
Nowicki
, Nat Institute of Transplantation
Slide19HCV donor-derived infection Jan 2008 to October 2013
DTAC Experience with Donor Hepatitis C Testing; WTC 2014
Slide20Timeline for implementation: OPOs and transplant hospitals need time to develop new internal procedures and testing protocols.Hemodialysis as an increased risk factor for HCV only
Education materials for patients considering increased risk organs
How to handle recipient consent if potential living donor meets increased risk criteriaAdditional Comment Themes
Slide21Overall Project Impact
4,950/17,885
4,500/10,680
Slide22Added clarification that HIV NAT is not required when dialysis is only
risk factor
For living and deceased donorsModifications to nomenclature for viruses to be consistent between living and deceased donor languageAddition to include appropriate living donor reference since it applies to living and deceased donorsPost-Public Comment Modifications
Slide232.9 Required Deceased Donor Infectious Disease Testing
e. Hepatitis C ribonucleic acid (RNA) by donor screening or diagnostic
nucleic acid test (NAT)
If a deceased donor is identified as being at increased risk for HIV, HBV, and HCV transmission according to
the U.S. Public Health Services (PHS) Guideline
, testing must also include HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) by
donor screening
or diagnostic NAT or HIV antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) combination test. This does not apply to donors whose only increased risk factor is receiving hemodialysis within the preceding 12 months, as they are at risk only for HCV according to the U.S. Public Health Services (PHS) Guideline.Proposed Amendment to Language (lines 90 and 97, page 24 of book)
Slide24RESOLVED, that additions and modifications to Policies 2.2 (OPO Responsibilities), 2.4 (Deceased Donor Medical and Behavioral History), 2.7.B (Informing Personnel), Table 14-2 (Requirements for Living Kidney Donor Medical Evaluations) with the exception of NAT-related requirements, 15.3 (Informed Consent of Transmissible Disease Risk), 15.3.A (Deceased Donors with Additional Risk Identified Pre-transplant), 15.3.B (Deceased Donor at Increased Risk for Transmission of Blood-borne Pathogens), and 16.7.B (Vessel Storage) as set forth in Exhibit A, are hereby approved, effective February 1, 2015
.
and…Resolution 13 (page 22)
Slide25FURTHER RESOLVED, that additions and modifications related to donor nucleic acid testing (NAT) requirements in Policy 2.9 (Required Deceased Donor Infectious Disease Testing) and Table 14-2 (Requirements for Living Kidney Donor Medical Evaluations) as set forth in Exhibit A, are hereby approved, effective pending programming and notice to the OPTN membership.
Resolution 13 (page 22)
Slide26Thank you!
Daniel Kaul, MD, Committee Chair
kauld@med.umich.eduShandie Covington, Committee Liaisonshandie.covington@unos.org
Questions?