/
California California

California - PDF document

adah
adah . @adah
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2021-07-06

California - PPT Presentation

Alaska Great Basin Great Lakes Northeast Northern Plains NCentRockies Pacific Northwest South Central S Appalachians SouthwestBiophysical Site DescriptionThese dry sites are easily recognized due ID: 855028

severity fire lifeform frequency fire severity frequency lifeform year replacement layer fires upper data class model surface 100 dominant

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Pdf The PPT/PDF document "California" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1 Alaska California Great Basin Great Lak
Alaska California Great Basin Great Lakes Northeast Northern Plains N-Cent.Rockies Pacific Northwest South Central S. Appalachians SouthwestBiophysical Site DescriptionThese dry sites are easily recognized due to the serpentine soils, and are more pronounced on southern aspects. At elevations from 2003500ft ASL, the sites will likely be dominated by Jeffrey pine. Soils are Vegetation Type Upland Savannah/Shrub SteppePIJEARVI4CEPUFEROModeler 1 10/25/2005 General Information Klamath-Siskiyou Xeromorphic Serpentine Savanna and ChaparralBiophysical SettingLANDFIRE Biophysical Setting ModelModeler 2Modeler 3Geographic Range Literature Local Data Expert EstimateGeneral Model Sources Dominant S p ecies Contributors This BPS is lumped with: This BPS is split into multiple models:(also see the Comments field) HawaiiThursday, January 23, 2014Page 1 of 5 subtype associated with incense-cedar and Douglas-fir. Herbaceous layer strongly dominated by grasses, notably Roemer fescue, and serpentine-adapted herbs. Occasional Ceanothus pumilis, Arctostaphylos viscidus, and occasionally Quercus breweri.Disturbance DescriptionHistorically, these woodland types had frequent low-severity fire (Fire Regime I). However, now there is higher susceptibility to stand replacing fire because of fire exclusion. Throughout the model, replacement fires reset to Class A, and surface fires recycle into the same class.Scale DescriptionRegionally a relatively small part of the landscape, but of great value for plant diversity. Patches in thousands of acres. However, disturbance patches were occasionally smaller in mixed severity fires. In a few areas, these occur on gravel deposits or very mineralized soils that will not support fine fuels (grasslands). Thes

2 e open savanna and shrublands have long
e open savanna and shrublands have long return intervals and patchy fires rather than underburns.Adjacency or Identification ConcernsAlso found in northern California on similar sites. These woodlands are usually found at low elevations within a matrix of mixed conifer and mixed evergreen stands. However, their identity lies in the soil conditions, rather than envirnmental gradients.This PNVG may be similar to the PNVG R1PIJE from the California model zone. Vegetation Classes Issues/ProblemsOther disturbances in this type include wind-weather-stress, insects-disease, and competition-lack of seed. However, these disturbances were not modeled in VDDT.CommentsNote this type is defined as only occurring on ultramafic geology-- model does not apply to Jeffrey pine on other areas. Also, Festuca roemeri is only recently described, and most southwestern Oregon plot data will inlude this species as Festuca idahoensisOne reviewer suggests that the range of fire frequency be qualified by the biomass productivity, which is keyed to soil chemistry. Anothere reviewer posited that fire intervals are likely still longer than shown here, but that there is little data.Native Uncharacteristic ConditionsShrub cover 50% indicates fire return intervals are too high.Thursday, January 23, 2014Page 2 of 5**Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Class BScattered Jeffrey pine seedlings and saplings with herbaceous understory. Replacement fires (MFR=200yrs) and surface fires (MFR=15yrs) occur. Succeeds to class B aftere about 30yrsPIJEFEROAC

3 LE8DACA3Class AEarl Develo p ment 1 All
LE8DACA3Class AEarl Develo p ment 1 All StructureDescription Indicator Species and Canopy Position Upper Layer Lifeform Herbaceous Shrub TreeTree Size ClassSapling� 4.5ft; 5"DBHFuel Model Cover030Tree 0mTree 5mMinMaxHei Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Dominant life form is always either grasses or chaparral shrublands, based on the fire return interval. Areas with high fire returns supported grass savanna, while areas with lower return intervals were chaparral.Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Open stands of Jeffrey pine, with grass and forb understory and shrubs. Open chapparal with trees. Replacement fires (MFR=200yrs) and surface fires (MFR=15yrs) occur. After about 90yrs, succession to Class C.Mid Develo p ment 1 O p Description Upper Layer Lifeform Herbaceous Shrub TreeTree Size ClassMedium 9-21"DBHFuel Model Cover1140Tree 5.1mTree 50mMinMaxHei Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Distinguished from Classes C and D by the diameter range and by having a grass understory.Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Scattered large Jeffrey pine, grass savanna maintained by frequent low intensity fire. Replacement fires (MFR=200yrs) and surface fires (MFR=15yrs) occur. Also, after 25yrs without fire, succession to Class D.Late Develo p ment 1 O p Description Upper Layer Lifeform Herbaceous Shrub TreeTree Size ClassLarge 21-33"DBHFuel Model Cover030Tree 10.1mTree 50mMinMaxHei Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. These are grasslands with trees. The dominants are Festuca roemeri (F. idahoensis in plot data), Achnatherum lemmonii, and Danthonia californicaStructure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Class C LowerLowerLowerPIJEARVI8FEROIndicator Species and

4 Canopy Position U MiddleLowerPIJEDACA3F
Canopy Position U MiddleLowerPIJEDACA3FEROIndicator Species and Canopy Position U LowerLowerThursday, January 23, 2014Page 3 of 5**Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Replacement200100300MixedSurface151020 Literature Local Data Ex ert Estimate Disturbances Avg FIMin FIMax FI0.0050.06667ProbabilityPercent of All Fires All Fires140.07168Sources of Fire Regime Data Additional Disturbances Modeled Fire Intervals Fire Intervals (FI):Fire interval is expressed in years for each fire severity class and for all types of fire combined (All Fires). Average FI is central tendency modeled. Minimum and maximum show the relative range of fire intervals, if known. Probability is the inverse of fire interval in years and is used in reference condition modeling. Percent of all fires is the percent of all fires in that severity class. Fire Regime Group**: Scattered large Jeffrey pine, open chapparal shrubland which develop in areas with lower fire frequencies. Fire is less frequent in this stand condition. Replacement fires (MFR=300yrs) and surface fires (MFR=20yrs) occur.Late Develo p ment 2 O p Description Upper Layer Lifeform Herbaceous Shrub TreeTree Size ClassLarge 21-33"DBHFuel Model Cover060Shrub 0.6mShrub� 3.1mMinMaxHei Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Trees are 0-30% canopy 10.1=50m, as in C. (Boxes for this class changed to abide by mapping rules.) Shrublands with trees. Dominant life form is mid to tall shrublands. Includes Arctostaphylos viscidus, A. canescens, Quercus breweri, Cea

5 nothus cuneatus, and the low growing Cea
nothus cuneatus, and the low growing Ceanothus pumilus, with grasses and forbs.Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Class D 0 [ Not Used ] [ Not Used ] Description Upper Layer Lifeform Herbaceous Shrub TreeTree Size ClassFuel Model CoverMinMaxHei Upper layer lifeform differs from dominant lifeform. Structure Data (for upper layer lifeform) Class EHistorical Fire Size (acres) AvgMinMaxPIJEARVI8CEC Indicator Species and Canopy Position U MiddleMiddleIndicator Species and Canopy Position Thursday, January 23, 2014Page 4 of 5**Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severity. Insects/Disease Wind/Weather/Stress Com etition Other (optional 1) References Atzet, T., D.E. White, L.A. McCrimmon, P.A. Martinez. P.R. Fong, and V.D. Randall. 1996. Field guide to the forested plant associations of Southwestern Oregon. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Tech. Pap. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-17-96.Burns, R.M. and B.H. Honkala. 1990. Silvics of North America: Vol. 1, conifers. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service Ag. Handbook 654. 675 pp.NatureServe. 2007. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. NatureServe Central Databases. Arlington, VA. Data current as of 10 February 2007. N ative Grazin g Other (optional 2)Thursday, January 23, 2014Page 5 of 5**Fire Regime Groups are: I: 0-35 year frequency, surface severity; II: 0-35 year frequency, replacement severity; III: 35-100+year frequency, mixed severity; IV: 35-100+ year frequency, replacement severity; V: 200+ year frequency, replacement severi