/
Bruckner’s codas (Two case studies) Bruckner’s codas (Two case studies)

Bruckner’s codas (Two case studies) - PowerPoint Presentation

alexa-scheidler
alexa-scheidler . @alexa-scheidler
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2019-12-07

Bruckner’s codas (Two case studies) - PPT Presentation

Bruckners codas Two case studies Vishnu Bachani 9 September 2017 Bruckner Society of America Guiding question What makes Bruckners codas tick ie how are they constructed and how do they function ID: 769553

coda minor symphony tonic minor coda tonic symphony major bruckner

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Bruckner’s codas (Two case studies)" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Bruckner’s codas(Two case studies) Vishnu Bachani 9 September 2017 Bruckner Society of America

Guiding question What makes Bruckner’s codas “tick,” i.e., how are they constructed and how do they function?

Prior Efforts (And failures) Nathan Pell, “Key Profiles in Bruckner’s Symphonic Expositions: ‘Ein Potpourri von Exaltionen’?” (unpublished) “Bruckner’s coda is a masterful example of motivic synthesis…Here, both the descending and ascending forms of the tetrachord—crucial engines of the movement’s motivic growth—are made to sound simultaneously.” (56, in reference to the coda of Symphony No. VI, mvt. 2). Michael Moravcsik, “The Coda in the Symphonies of Anton Bruckner” ( The Music Review , Vol 34, 1973). “The…chorale…drops , without any warning whatsoever, from an (admittedly transient) C sharp major into a D major and then into the tonic of A major. I must confess that this particular modulation unsettles me, even now ” (244, in reference to the coda of Symphony No. VI, mvt. 1). Robert Simpson, The Symphonies of Anton Bruckner (The Camelot Press, 1967) “ During this coda Bruckner passes through the entire spectrum of tonality; there is no key that he does not suggest in its sixty bars” (129, in reference to the coda of Symphony No. VI, mvt. 1). Donald Tovey, Essays in Music Analysis , Volume II (Oxford University Press, 1962) “one of the greatest passages Bruckner ever wrote…passing from key to key beneath a tumultuous surface sparkling like the Homeric seas” ( 81, in reference to the coda of Symphony No. VI, mvt. 1 ).

Analytical Methodologies Examination of basic musical parameters: Melody Harmony Rhythm Form Given the small scale of the codas (relative to the entire symphony) and the prevalence of harmonic logic over melodic line, harmony will be my primary avenue of investigation

CRASH COURSE – TONAL HARMONY Tonal music is based on pitch centricity: one pitch (the tonic ) serves as an anchor and gravitational center to orient the local musical action Tonal pieces modulate often, wherein the (local) tonic is changed, typically through a cadence (gesture of tonal closure) in a new keyThe dominant to tonic (“V–I”) gesture, a.k.a. perfect cadence, is a common way to tonicize (modulate to, or make a temporary tonic of) a new keyHarmony, the study of vertical stacks of tones (as opposed to melody, the horizontal line) provides an opportunity to examine the logic of a tonal piece on multiple hierarchical levels: Notes of a scale → Chords → Key → Tonality (group of keys)

Example of the tonal hierarchy Consider the opening (simplified) of Beethoven’s Sonata No. 27 in E Minor, Op. 90: Measure 0-1 2-3 4 4-5 6 8 16 Chord e D dom7GGF♯dom7bB–D♯ vi–V–I (i.e., perfect cadence) in G major (!) vi–V–I (i.e., perfect cadence) in B minor (!?) Dominant and leading tone of E minor (finally!) Tonal pieces traditionally start on the tonic, and indeed Op. 90 appears to in the first bar, but then it turns out to be an E minor chord in the framework of G major! Typical Beethovenian trope, cf. Waldstein sonata, First Symphony, etc.The overarching tonality (group of keys) of E minor is logically expounded through successive tonicizations of G major and B minor rather than a surface-level E minor phrase. In fact, G major is as logically possible as E minor prior to the D♯ in m. 16Key insight: macrostructural harmonic organization acts a background structure governing surface-level musical action Vladimir Ashkenazy, 1997

CASE STUDY: BRUCKNER IV, MVt. 4 CODA (1880 version) Passage analyzed: orchestral theme directly following the horn chorale, leading to the final peroration Tonality E ♭ a a ♭ e ♭ E ♭ KeyE♭ a (1) C ( 3 ) E ( 5)a♭ (1)C♭ (3) Chord E ♭ F ♭ = EaGCBED♯G♯F♯ = G♭C♭B♭a♭G♭F♭E♭FunctionIViVIVIViVIVivIIINeapolitan (♭II)IMeasure513515517518519520521522523524525526527528529533 Conjecture: the final chord change of the symphony (F♭ to E♭, eight bars before the end) is compelling and carries finality precisely because it has been prefigured by a higher-level descending-half-step modulation between tonalities Sergiu Celibidache Münchner Philharmoniker 1983

CASE STUDY: Symphony No. VI, MVt. 1 CODA Passage analyzed: entire coda Conjecture : t he final “minor plagal” cadence from D minor to A major is effective precisely because D minor has been rigorously expounded through a long-drawn composing out (i.e., modulating to each of its scale degrees) of D minor’s dominant ninth chord, namely, A9. Not only does this provide a feeling of an inexorably impending D (confirmed at m. 353), it reinforces the final plagal cadence with stronger gravity than with which it is typically imbuedSergiu CelibidacheMünchner Philharmoniker1991Tonality A 9 (V9 of d) a A Key D ♭ ( 3 ̂)E (5)G (7)A (1)C♯ (3)b♭ (♭9)c (iii)C♭ (II)Romanesca progressionAChordAf♯D♭A♭EBGDAEBEAf♯C♯B♭FCGE♭C♭F♯DAB♭FG♭D♭ F♯C♯DdA Function VI iv I V=III ♯ IVIII=IVIVV/VVIvi = ivI=IIIIVIVIIIIVIVVIIIIVI♯III♯VI♯III♯IVivIBar #309313317319321323325327329330331332333334335337338339340341342343345346347348349350351352353357361

Recapitulation of key insights Bruckner’s cadential gestures, which often favor plagal and otherwise non-dominant to tonic resolutions, achieve such tremendous finality through a rigorous prefiguring of the surface-level action achieved through meticulous macrostructural harmonic organization When surface-level chords seem to be wandering rootlessly ( e .g., over “Homeric seas”), a closer look at the music reveals that they are articulating implicit background tonalities which govern the local harmonic motionThe tonic is typically projected through a variety of innovative means prior to the final tonic peroration, including composing out the dominant of a particular tonic to imply it (cf. Wagner’s establishment of keys through sounding their dominants)

FUTURE ROADMAP More codas! Investigation of prior musical material to determine symphony-specific musical “problems” (e.g., why A minor in the IV/4 coda?) that are then resolved in the codas Complementary musicological investigation, esp. to trace Bruckner’s practices to Wagner’s innovations Publication ! (WIP drafts at vishnubachani .com/music )