/
Decision Markets With Good Incentives Decision Markets With Good Incentives

Decision Markets With Good Incentives - PowerPoint Presentation

alexa-scheidler
alexa-scheidler . @alexa-scheidler
Follow
396 views
Uploaded On 2016-03-02

Decision Markets With Good Incentives - PPT Presentation

Yiling Chen Harvard Ian Kash Harvard   Internet and Network Economics 2011 amitsomechgmailcom Prediction Markets Project Manager Markets used for prediction the outcome of an event ID: 238472

market decision scoring prediction decision market prediction scoring rule markets action alice bob maker strictly outcome expert proper model experts problem time

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Decision Markets With Good Incentives" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Decision Markets With Good Incentives

Yiling Chen (Harvard), Ian Kash (Harvard), Internet and Network Economics,2011.

amitsomech@gmail.comSlide2

Prediction Markets

Project Manager

Markets used for

prediction

the outcome of an event

?Slide3

Decision Markets

Using (prediction) markets for decision making.For example: Deciding between hiring Alice or Bob.

Project Manager

?Slide4

Decision Markets

Decision maker creates two

conditional

prediction markets:

#1:

Will we complete testing on time ?| Alice is hired --- 0.66 #2:

Will we complete testing on time ?| Bob is hired --- 0.44

Project Manager

?

0.66

0.44Slide5

Decision Markets

DM considers the

final prediction

(

0.44

,0.66), then chooses action according to a decision rule :For example: MAX Decision Rule – choose the

Action with greater probability to achieve the desired outcome

Project Manager

?

0.66

0.44Slide6

Decision Markets

DM waits for the outcome.DM pays the experts according to:Final prediction (0.44,0.66)Action

(Hiring Alice)

Outcome

(

Testing completed on time )

Testing completed

on time

Testing delayed project DDSlide7

Decision Market - Definition

Prediction market is a special case of decision market.Both use the same sequential market structure.Decision market uses a decision rule to pick from a set of actions before the outcome is observed.Which action is chosen may affect the likelihood an outcome occurs.

Testing completed

on time

?

0.66

0.44

Sequential Market yields final prediction

Decision Maker chooses an action

An outcome occurs

Scoring the expertsSlide8

Outline

What are Decision MarketsexplanationModel: notations and definitionsProblem with myopic incentives

Incentive in Decision Markets

Decision Scoring rules

Existence of a strictly proper decision market

Necessity of full support in decision scoring rulesOptimal Decision Markets SuggestionsSlide9

Model: Assumptions

About experts and the market:Experts can only observe prior predictions before making their own.After the market ends, a final, consensus prediction is made.Experts are utility driven – no extern incentives.

About Decision making:

Decision maker chooses only one action.

*Decision maker can draw an action stochastically.

The method of decision can be described as a functionSlide10

Model: Notations and Definitions

From prediction markets:O – set of possible outcomes.

{finished on time, did not finish on time}

∆(O

) –

set of probability distribution over outcomes.pt ∆(O) –prediction made at round t

.Scoring Rule: A function for scoring a prediction p

∆(O) ,according to outcome o*

O .a shorthand:

 Slide11

Model: Notations and Definitions (2)

For Decision Market: new!A - finite set of actions

{Hiring Alice, Hiring Bob

}

∆(O)

|A | - set of conditional distributions, one for each action. Each expert predicts outcome for each and every action.The market is being held simultaneously for all actions

.Pt ∆(O)

|A | – prediction made at round

t (for all actions).

∆(O)

|

A

|

-

final report.

 Slide12

Model: Notations and Definitions

(3)Decision Rule: A function D(

)

-

Applied to the final report

∆(A) –

is a set of distributions: drawing an action a* from AShorthands: d – the distribution over all actionsda

– the likelihood action a is drawn from the set AExamples:MAX:

 

Note that

D(

) is a distribution. We will show that it is necessary for creating myopic incentive

compatibility.

 Slide13

Decision Market Model

1) The market opens.P0

(O)

|A|

– Initial Prediction in the market.Pt ∆(O) |A|

–Prediction at round t.2) The market closes at round , last prediction is

.

3) Decision maker applies the decision rule: D(

4) Decision maker draws a

single action

a* according to d.

5) The outcome o

*

is revealed.

6) Decision maker pays the experts.

How?

 Slide14

Outline

What are Decision MarketsexplanationModel: notations and definitionsProblem with myopic incentives

Incentive in Decision Markets

Decision Scoring rules

Existence of a strictly proper decision market

Necessity of full support in decision scoring rulesOptimal Decision Markets SuggestionsSlide15

Decision Market Model

1) The market opens.P0

(O)

|A|

– Initial Prediction in the market.Pt ∆(O) |A|

–Prediction at round t.2) The market closes at round , last prediction is

.

3) Decision maker applies the decision rule: D(

4) Decision maker draws a single action a* according to d.

5) The outcome o

*

is revealed.

6) Decision maker pays the experts.

How?

 

Apply a

scoring

rule

for

the selected actionSlide16

So, What Is the Problem?

Consider the following scenario:Decision maker creates a Decision market for choosing Alice or Bob.Decision rule: MAX (i.e., market maker hires the candidate with better predicted probability)

Payment method

: experts are paid after the candidate is hired, and the outcome is revealed , according to the

scoring rule

.

Testing completed

on time

?

0.66

0.44

Sequential Market yields final prediction

Decision Maker chooses an action

An outcome occurs

Scoring the expertsSlide17

So, What Is the Problem? (2)

Current Market values at some round t:Alice: 0.2 Bob: 0.8An expert with belief (Alice: 0.75

,Bob: 0.8

)

enters the market.

What will be the expert’s prediction?(Alice:0.75,Bob:0.8) raise Alice’s market value to 0.75.(Alice:0.81,Bob:0.8) Raise Alice’s market value to 0.81.(Alice:0.75,Bob:0.74

) Lower Bob’s market value to 0.74 and raise Alice’s to 0.75Slide18

So, What Is the Problem? (2)

Current Market values:Alice: 0.2 Bob: 0.8An expert with belief (Alice: 0.75,Bob: 0.8

)

enters the market.

What will be the expert’s prediction?

raise Alice’s market value to 0.75.Raise Alice’s market value to 0.81.Lower Bob’s market value to 0.74 and raise Alice’s to 0.75.Do not participate.Slide19

So, What Is the Problem? (3)

A. Truthful reporting:The expert raises Alice’s market value to 0.75Decision maker chooses Bob (has prob. 0.8)Expert get nothing (he doesn’t own Bob shares)B.

Overbuying Alice:

The expert raises Alice’s market value to

0.81

Decision maker chooses Alice (has prob. 0.81)Expert’s payment: Raising from 0.2 to 0.75: PositiveRaising from 0.75 to 0.81: NegativeOverall: PositiveSlide20

So, What Is the Problem? (4)

C. Leveling Alice and Artificially Lowering Bob:The expert raises Alice’s market value to 0.75The expert lowers Bob’s market value to 0.74

Decision

maker chooses

Alice (has

prob. 0.75)Expert’s payment: Raising from 0.2 to 0.75: PositiveSlide21

So, What Is the Problem? (5)

Is C better than B? Consider then 2nd expert (with the same belief [Alice:0.75,Bob:0.8]):case C:

Market value is: Alice – 0.75, Bob- 0.74

Expert #2 will raise Bob’s value back to 0.8!

case B: Market value is: Alice – 0.81, Bob- 0.8Expert #2:Buying short on Alice will result in no payoffThus, Expert #2 do nothing!! Slide22

Outline

What are Decision MarketsexplanationModel: notations and definitionsProblem with myopic incentives

Incentive in Decision Markets

Decision Scoring

rules

Existence of a strictly proper decision marketNecessity of full support in decision scoring rulesWith Strictly properness, preferred action can be chosen W.P close to

(but not) 1.Optimal Decision Markets SuggestionsSlide23

Scoring Experts:

Decision Scoring RuleInstead of scoring by a scoring rule ( ), with respect only to the outcome and the prediction for the chosen action, we use a decision scoring rule. Decision scoring rule:

Written

Mapping an

action, outcome, decision policy and prediction to the extended reals.Slide24

Decision Rule:

d(P)

Decision Scoring rule:

s

o

- is a logarithmic scoring rule :1+logx

So if Alice is hired, and final prediction is

Alice:0.25, Bob:0.75

d

Alice

= 0.2,

d

Bob

=0.8

S

A

lice,finished

on time,

=5*(1+log(0.25))

S

Bob,finished

on time

,

=1.25*(1+log(0.75))

 

Decision Scoring Rule: ExampleSlide25

Expected score:

Q – the expert’s personal beliefP – the expert’s prediction This is the sum of possible scores weighted by how likely each score: to be realized (Strictly) Properness: For all beliefs Q, distributions d and d’ and prediction PStrictly properness: the inequality is strict unless P=Q

Decision Scoring Rule

: Slide26

Myopic Incentives in Prediction Vs. Decision Markets

Decision

Markets

Prediction

Markets

Expected payment of a single expert(strictly*) Proper scoring rule*inequality is strict unless q=p

d

a

-

porbability

for choosing action

a

Q

a,o

– (vector) belief of

ouctome

o

for each action

a

S

a,o

Decision scoring rule with respect to the final prediction

P

and the probability vector

d

for choosing an actionSlide27

Outline

What are Decision MarketsexplanationModel: notations and definitionsProblem with myopic incentives

Incentive in Decision Markets

Decision Scoring rules

Existence of a strictly proper decision market

Necessity of full support in decision scoring rulesWith Strictly properness, preferred action can be chosen W.P close to (but not) 1.

Optimal Decision Markets SuggestionsSlide28

Strictly Proper Decision Market

Existence of a strictly proper decision marketTheorem 1: let D be a decision rule (with full support *). Then there exists a decision rule S such that (D,S) is strictly properSlide29

Strictly Proper Decision Market (2)

Existence of a strictly proper decision marketProof:for any strictly proper scoring rule s: Then the expected payment is:

Prediction Market Scoring rule

Linearity of ExpectationSlide30

Strictly Proper Decision Market (3)

Necessity of full-supportFull support decision rule: if Slide31

This Model is Still Not Optimal

We proved that MAX decision rule can not be used in myopic incentive compatible decision marketA stochastic decision rule with full support is crucial for obtaining myopic incentive compatibilityIn practice, no decision maker will knowingly choose the wrong decision, even with small probability Slide32

Optimal Decision Markets

Right Action Rules (Chen[2012])Compensation function: (Boutilier [2012])Fool the agents (TA example)