/
How Proportionate Are We? How Proportionate Are We?

How Proportionate Are We? - PowerPoint Presentation

alexa-scheidler
alexa-scheidler . @alexa-scheidler
Follow
363 views
Uploaded On 2018-02-19

How Proportionate Are We? - PPT Presentation

Correlation of Ear and Pinkie Lengths Research Team Designed PowerPoint First Quantitative Variable Ear Length The unit of measurement for this variable is INCHES A few possible values for this first quantitative variable are 2IN 2 ½ IN and 3IN ID: 633236

ear pinky variable length pinky ear length variable correlation quantitative quartile summary size significant lengths amp study person plot

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "How Proportionate Are We?" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

How Proportionate Are We?

Correlation of Ear and Pinkie Lengths

Research Team

Designed PowerPointSlide2

First Quantitative Variable: Ear Length

The unit of measurement for this variable is INCHES.

A few possible values for this first quantitative variable are 2IN. 2 ½ IN. and 3IN. Slide3

Second quantitative variable is Pinky Length

The unit of measurement is INCHES.

A few possible quantitative variables are 2IN. 3IN. & 2 ½IN.Slide4

Purpose: Find if correlation exists between the pinky finger and ear for a particular person.

For the study we randomly selected and measured a pinky and an ear from each person using a measuring tape. Slide5

Data Table

People

Pinky size

Ear size12 .52 .5232.832 .52 .5422 .552 .52 .563372.8

2.8

8

2.8

3

9

3.3

3.3

10

2 .52 .511221233132 .52 .5143.83.8152 .52 .5162.62.6172.42.4182.42.4

19

1.6

1.6

20

2.4

2.4

21

2

2

22

2.4

2.3

23

2.2

2.3

24

2

2

25

2.3

2.3

26

2.4

2.4

27

2.4

2.4

28

2.2

2.2

29

1.6

1.7

30

2.4

1.7

31

2.5

2.2

32

2.9

2.5

33

2.2

2.2

34

2.3

2.4

35

2.3

2.2

36

2.4

2.4Slide6

Summary Statistics

First Variable: Pinky Length

Mean: 2.45556Standard Deviation: 0.432

Five Number Summary: Minimum: 1.6 First Quartile: 2.2 Median: 2.4 Third Quartile: 2.55 Maximum: 3.75Range: 2.15Mode: 2.4Outliers: 1.6, 3.75Slide7

Summary Statistics Cont.

Second Variable: Ear Length

Mean (pinky size): 2.43333Standard Deviation: 0.482Five Number Summary: Minimum: 1.6 First Quartile: 2.2 Median: 2.4 Third Quartile: 2.5 Maximum: 3.75

Range: 2.15Mode: 2.5Outliers: 1.6, 3.75Slide8

Pinky Size: Box Plot & HistogramsSlide9

Ear Length: Box Plot & HistogramSlide10

Scatter Plots

X axis: Ear Length Y Axis: Pinky LengthSlide11

Conclusion

The study did show a

significant correlation

between pinky length and ear length. Our correlation coefficient is above this (at 0.862) and qualifies as being statistically significant. (Critical Value was .325)So in answer to our question there is a significant correlation between pinky lengths and ear lengths.