PPT-Reviewing Grant Submissions

Welcome and Overview Denise Battaglini Reviewing Grant Submissions Agenda Submission Requirements Financial Review Panel Review QampAWrapUp Reviewing Grant Submissions Grant Submission Requirements. Comments and suggestions regarding this draft document should be submitted within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register of the notice announcing the availability of the draft guidance Submit electronic comments to httpwwwregulationsgov Sub Preparation of Written Submissions. 30 March 2015. Fundamental points about an appeal. Not a re-arguing of the case. An appeal is not an opportunity to re-argue the case – to have a “second bite of the cherry”.. 119. . submissions. Paris ‘09: . 113 . (deadline . after. STOC) . Prague '06: . 87. . Aarhus '03: . 65 . Florence '00: . 63. . 18 junk submissions. 34. papers accepted. Second highest ever? Paris ’09 had . Laurie and Willem. Welcome. Thanks for serving!. 28 Program Board members. In charge of +-22 papers. Full review for +-6 of those. 89 Program . C. ommittee members. +-16 papers to review. General Philosophy . Louise . Livesey. Academic Skills Adviser. This workshop will:.  . Explain what completing a review of literature involves. Offer tips on how to manage the reviewing process. Show you basic strategies for taking a critical approach to literature at . Before we begin…. There is no ‘perfect guide to mooting’. As we discuss the way that we prepared for our moots, keep in mind that your team will develop their own strategies. A lot depends on team dynamics, and no team is the same. May 2014. Operator. Operator will advise grantee listeners that they are in listen-only . mode initially. How/when . to ask a . question. HRSA personnel will present some Grants information and then open the call to Q&A . Structure of today’s session . Introduction . Preparing for the moot . Written submissions . Oral submissions . General tips . The . UoA. Mooting Society . Questions? . Introduction. Introduction . Preparation of Written Submissions. 30 March . 2016. Written . submissions. Structure. As a general point to remember you will know the case better than the . Judge. . You should be aiming to adopt a structure which:. Informational session. * . To play . The . presentation, click on . this . icon On the Status Bar . below. Yale IRBs. HIC I (paper submissions only). HIC II (Coeus, paper). HIC III (Coeus, paper). Input we’ve heard from you so far:. More streamlined communication about submissions:. Less paper. Ability to review submissions online in real time. Include events on submissions list. Submissions site improvements:. C onfirmation of communication options for GT/UIP submissions to Cadent ( UIP/GT Briefing Note 9 ) 1. Introduction This briefing note is being issued to confirm the details for submitting GT/UIP documentation for processing. Hynda. K. Kleinman. hyndakk@aol.com. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/ep/Tutorial.html. . https:. //grants.nih.gov/grants/writing_application.htm. Annotated Sample R01 grant (from NIAID). https:. //www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/grants/app/default.htm. Math. : This month we are learning to tell time to the nearest minute on an analog clock, find the area and perimeter of given shapes, and reviewing key math skills . in test prep activities. . Social Studies/Science.