Electrons 3He 4He etc And of NonConserved Particles Phonons Magnons Rotons We Found for NonConserved Bosons Eg Phonons that we can describe the system in terms of canonical coordinates ID: 468520
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Second Quantization of Conserved Particl..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Second Quantization of Conserved Particles
Electrons, 3He, 4He, etc.
And of Non-Conserved Particles
Phonons, Magnons, Rotons…Slide2
We Found for Non-Conserved Bosons
E.g., Phonons that we can describe the system in terms of canonical coordinates
We can then quantize the systemAnd immediately second quantize via a canonical (preserve algebra) transformSlide3
We create our states out of the vacuum
And describe experiments with Green functionsWith Slide4
Creation of (NC) Particles at x
We could Fourier transform our creation and annihilation operators to describe quantized excitations in space
poetic licenseThis allows us to dispense with single particle (and constructed MP) wave functionsSlide5
We saw, the density goes from
And states are still created from vacuumThese operators can create an N-particle stateWith conjugate
Most significantly, they do what we want to!
Think <x|p>Slide6
That is, they take care of the identical particle statistics for usI.e., the operators must
And the Slater determinant or permanent is automatically encoded in our algebraSlide7
Second Quantization of Conserved Particles
For conserved particles, the introduction of single particle creation and annihilation operators is, if anything, natural
In first quantization, Slide8
Then to second quantize
The density takes the usual form, so an external potential (i.e. scalar potential in E&M)And the kinetic energySlide9
The full interacting Hamiltonian is then
It looks familiar, apart from the two ::, they ensure normal ordering so that the interaction acting on the vacuum gives you zero, as it must. There are no particle to interact in the vacuumCan I do this (i.e. the ::)? Slide10
p42c4Slide11
The Algebra
Where + is for Fermions and – for Bosons
Here 1 and 2 stand for the full set of labels of a particle (location, spin, …)Slide12
Transform between different bases
Suppose we have the r and s bases
WhereI can write (typo)
If this is how the 1ps transform then we use if for operators x or k (n)Slide13
With algebra transforming as
I.e. the transform is canonical. We can transform between the position and discrete basis Where is the nth
wavefunction. If the corresponding destruction operator is justSlide14
Is this algebra right?
It does keep countSinceF [
ab,c]=abc-cab + acb-acb =a{b,c}-{a,c}bB [ab,c]=abc
-cab + acb-acb =a[b,c]+[a,c]b For FermionsEq. 4.22Slide15
It also gives the right particle exchange statistics.
Consider Fermions in the 1,3,4 and 6th one particle states, and then exchange 4 <-> 6
Perfect!Slide16
And the Boson state is appropriately symmetric
3 hand written examples (second L4 file)Slide17
Second Quantized Particle Interactions
The two-particle interaction must be normal ordered so that
Also hw example