/
Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – An effective force Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – An effective force

Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – An effective force - PowerPoint Presentation

alida-meadow
alida-meadow . @alida-meadow
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2017-04-11

Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – An effective force - PPT Presentation

Gareth Millward 3 rd Year PhD supervisor Dr Martin Gorsky London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Project funded by the Wellcome Trust Centre for History in Public Health Improving health ID: 536306

effective disabled disability people disabled effective people disability social act disablement persons income group government bill committee society benefits

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – ..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Disability and Voluntarism, 1965-95 – An effective force in policy making?

Gareth Millward – 3rd Year PhD (supervisor Dr Martin Gorsky)London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineProject funded by the Wellcome Trust

Centre for History in Public Health

Improving health

worldwide

www.lshtm.ac.ukSlide2

DIG

RADAR

CCD

BCRD

DA

BCODP

Spastics Society

CS & Disabled Persons Act

Disabled Persons (

SCaR

) Act

Disability Discrimination Act

UPIAS

OPCS Survey

Disabled Persons Act

International Year of Disabled People

CORAD

Civil Rights Bills

Disabled Persons (Employment) Act 1944

SJC

New invalidity benefits

Disability Working and Living Allowances

Rights Now!

SCOPE

Personal Capacity Assessments

1965

1995

1990

1985

1980

1975

1970

A Simplified Time LineSlide3

The social model

Disability is a social issueImpairment only becomes disability because society makes it soA fair society would allow impaired people the same chances to live as autonomously as non-impaired peopleSlide4

Effective?

Whiggish interpretation – “progress” is madeExcellent manipulation of “problem” and “politics”Poor at influencing “solution”

The Times, 15th November 1971, p. 1.Slide5

There has been a growing demand, of which that remarkable organisation the

Disablement Income Group has been the spearhead, for special provision over and above what is already given for anyone seriously handicapped on disablement. We have all been deeply moved by the lives as well as the words of people like Anne Armstrong and Megan du

Boisson. Without them it may well be that Clause 17 would never have found its place in the Bill. The Government can claim credit for listening to people who knew all too well what they were talking about. Effective?Richard Crossman, 1970, Secretary of State for Social Services in the second reading of the National Superannuation and Social Insurance Bill 1969. HC Deb 19 January 1970 vol. 794 c. 64.Slide6

This money resolution arises because, as the result of great ingenuity, amendments were carried in Committee which brought disabled housewives into the position in which they could have been paid out of the National Insurance Fund. That ingenuity was, in fact, that of

Mr. Peter Large and Mr. Stuart Lyon, of the Disablement Income Group

. They are well known to hon. Members who follow this subject. They provided the drafting for extremely carefully chosen amendments which (Mr. Carter-Jones) and (Mr. Dunlop), were able to carry against the Government votes in Committee.Effective?Kenneth Clarke, 1975, opposition spokesman in committee on the Social Security Bill 1974. HC Deb 29 January 1975 vol. 885 c. 423.Slide7

A leading article in ‘The Spectator’ was able to say that “

of all the pressure groups which harry government – especially the social welfare pressure groups – none is more mature, more influential, more considered in its actions than the Disablement Income Group”. Whether this is true or not, this kind of belief  has given DIG both authority and charisma.

Effective?Internal DHSS Memo, 1972, TNA: BN 89/140, Study Group on Cash Benefits for the Disabled, CBD2, The Disablement Income Group, 15 December 1972, paras. 1, 11.Slide8

Outcome Examples

DDA employment sections did not apply to businesses employing fewer than 20 peopleNew capacity tests looked at medically ascertainable functional limitations – not disease nomenclatureBenefits paid more equally based on need – but still at levels far too low to alleviate povertySlide9

Effective?Slide10

Effective?Slide11

We have very grave misgivings [...] about resources being devoted to cultivating so-called wet Tory MPs or to direct meetings with Conservative Ministers.

Against the backdrop of cuts and the onslaught on the welfare state, it would be invidious for an organisation, which seeks to represent the needs of disabled people, to help lend respectability to the Government’s policies by sitting around the table for discussions with Ministers.

Effective?Internal Disability Alliance memo, July 1983, Peter Townsend Collection, University of Essex.Slide12

Gareth Millwardwww.vahs.org.uk

(for the 40 minute version)gazmillward@hotmail.comhistory.lshtm.ac.uk

Thanks!