PPT-The Moral Argument

Author : alida-meadow | Published Date : 2015-12-06

Is goodness without God good enough A Cautionary Note The argument is NOT that knowledge of God is required to be good People could breath long before scientists

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "The Moral Argument" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

The Moral Argument: Transcript


Is goodness without God good enough A Cautionary Note The argument is NOT that knowledge of God is required to be good People could breath long before scientists knew about air Romans 215 They Gentiles show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts their consciences also bearing witness and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them . for. objectivism and subjectivism. An . objective truth . is one that is true independently of how humans happen to think or feel about it.. Objectivism. : There are at least some objective moral truths. . Michael Lacewing. enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk. Cognitivism v. non-cognitivism. What are we doing when we. make moral judgments?. Cognitivism: moral judgments, e.g. ‘Murder is wrong’. Aim to describe how the world is. Phil/RS 335. Why be good?. Like the design argument, the moral argument for . God. '. s . existence seems more directly rooted in our everyday experience than the more abstract considerations which generate the ontological and cosmological arguments.. The Social Construction of Reality. Peter Berger and Thomas . Luckman. , 1966. Knowledge is derived from and maintained by social interaction. The meanings of anything are the product of human interpretations and are not in nature. Learning Outcomes. All. will know and understand Stanley Cohen’s theory of . moral panics. .. Most. will understand how this links to Naomi Klein’s . Shock Doctrine. .. Some. will be able to identify contemporary moral panics in the mass media.. Philosophy of Education – Chapter 9. Author: . Nel. . Noddings. Chapter Highlights. Historical background of prominent ethical theories. Perspectives on Moral Education. Critical Analysis of Kohlberg’s theory of moral development. in . Service Members . and . Veterans. Chaplain Kerry Haynes. D.Min. ., M.Div., BCC/MH. Mental Health Chaplain. San Antonio VA. Objectives. Describe moral injury. Differentiate moral . i. njury from PTSD. Ethical Theory: Relativism. Relativism. : the general philosophical theory that states that there are no firm criteria for judging one individual. ’s or one . culture’s set of moral values, principles, and guidelines of ethical conduct as better than or more rational or superior to any other.. Chaplain (Col.) Herman Keizer, Jr. (U.S. Army, ret.) . Founding Co-Director (retired). The Soul Repair Center. Brite Divinity School. www.brite.edu/soulrepair. . Returning Home, Strengthening Families. enquiries@alevelphilosophy.co.uk. Cognitivism v. non-cognitivism. What are we doing when we. make moral judgments?. Cognitivism: moral judgments, e.g. ‘Murder is wrong’. Aim to describe how the world is. If that’s so, what is the argument here?. Every argument starts with a question.. So – what questions does this text inspire? . SOAPS is one way to start thinking about how to argue.. S = What is the subject?. Causal arguments are inductive arguments in which the conclusion is a claim that one thing causes another.. For example:. Clogged arteries cause heart attacks. A rough surface produces friction. Exercise during heat causes sweating. La gamme de thé MORPHEE vise toute générations recherchant le sommeil paisible tant désiré et non procuré par tout types de médicaments. Essentiellement composé de feuille de morphine, ce thé vous assurera d’un rétablissement digne d’un voyage sur . Why Argue?. Argument is not in itself an end or a purpose of communication. It is rather a means of discourse, a way of developing what we have to say. We can identify four primary aims or purposes that argument helps us accomplish:.

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"The Moral Argument"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents