/
Tom Bird Consultant Clinical Oncologist Tom Bird Consultant Clinical Oncologist

Tom Bird Consultant Clinical Oncologist - PowerPoint Presentation

alis
alis . @alis
Follow
64 views
Uploaded On 2024-01-29

Tom Bird Consultant Clinical Oncologist - PPT Presentation

June 2023 Introduction of PSMAPETCT scan as a onestop staging scan for very high risk localised prostate cancer The Bristol MDT Pilot Overview Background Proposal Results Discussion Background ID: 1041896

staging pet mdt results pet staging results mdt psma reported sensitivity within21 incorporated amp compared days major pathwayequivocal presence

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Tom Bird Consultant Clinical Oncologist" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. Tom BirdConsultant Clinical OncologistJune 2023Introduction of PSMA-PET-CT scan as a one-stop staging scan for very high risk localised prostate cancerThe Bristol MDT Pilot

2. OverviewBackgroundProposalResultsDiscussion

3. BackgroundMore ‘accurate’ (proPSMA)Potential to improve outcomesImpact on outcomes currently unknown - ?could be worseEquivocal findings – resource implication & uncertaintyPathway effects?GuidelinesClinical trial recruitmentPostcode lotteryPatient queries

4. BackgroundMore ‘accurate’ (proPSMA)Potential to improve outcomesImpact on outcomes currently unknown - ?could be worseEquivocal findings – resource implication & uncertaintyPathway effects?GuidelinesClinical trial recruitmentPostcode lotteryPatient queries

5. Proposal6 month PilotGo Live MDT: 02 November 2022Approximately 30 patientsChoose a cohort of men with potentially highest chance of PSMA-PET positivityProspective patient listRetrospective data collectionModification of STAMPEDE criteria for ‘very high risk’N1 disease on MRI prostate ORGleason 9OR2 of: T3b/T4 on MRIGleason 8PSA>40MDT Criteria

6. Proposal (2)

7. Evaluation PointsCan a PSMA-PET-CT be requested, performed and reported in a timely manner (similar to current CT/bone scan timelines) so that the patient’s cancer diagnostic pathway is not delayedAre the correct patients having a PSMA-PET-CT requested by the urology MDT (as per locally set eligibility criteria)Do equivocal PSMA-PET-CT results cause uncertainty for the MDT in its treatment recommendationsDo equivocal PSMA-PET-CT scans lead to further imaging requests (e.g. MRI scans) for clarificationWhat treatments did these men receive?

8. Results2/11/22 – 31/5/23 inclusive31 MDTs37 PSMA-PET-CT

9. Results: Cohort CharacteristicsNumberPercentageAgeAge (50-79; median: 68)<60719%60-701643%70-801438%CT ± Bone scan1027%PSA<10719%10-201130%20-30411%30-40411%40-100719%>100411%

10. Results: Cohort CharacteristicsNumberPercentGleason 9 OR N12467%Gleason 9 + N126%Gleason 9 only1644%N1 only617%2 of: T3b/4, Gleason 8, PSA>401233%All 313%T3b/T4 + Gleason 8514%T3b/T4 + PSA>40514%Gleason 8 + PSA>4013%

11. Results: TimelinesMDT – PET: Median 9 days, <10 days: 57%; <16 days: 78%PET – Report: Median: 4 days, <7 days: 100%MDT – Report: Median 16 days, <21 days: 86%MDT – MDT: Median: 21 days

12. Results: Equivocal results1 x non-PSMA avid disease – referred for bone scan1 x indeterminate adrenal lesion – referred for CT adrenal1 x ?sarcoid – referred for CT chest1 x ?T8 metastasis (& pre sacral nodes) – for MRI T-spine

13. Results: Staging resultsN1 Mx on MRIN0 Mx on MRI

14. Results: Staging results (2)10 patients having conventional & PSMA-PET-CT staging

15. Results: Staging & TreatmentsStaging PSMA-PET

16. Results: Staging & TreatmentsRALP (7)H+RT (9)Staging PSMA-PETN0M017

17. Results: Staging & TreatmentsRALP (7)H+RT (9)Staging PSMA-PETN0M017pT3b pN1 pT3a pN1pT3a pN0pT3a pN0pT2 pN0X2 TBC

18. Results: Staging & TreatmentsRALP (7)H+RT (9)Staging PSMA-PETN0M0N1M0RALP (1)H+RT (7)178pT3b pN1 pT3a pN1pT3a pN0pT3a pN0pT2 pN0X2 TBC

19. Results: Staging & TreatmentsRALP (7)H+RT (9)Staging PSMA-PETN0M0N1M0M1Systemic Therapy alone (2)RALP (1)H+RT (7)Systemic Therapy + RT (10)17812pT3b pN1 pT3a pN1pT3a pN0pT3a pN0pT2 pN0X2 TBC

20. Conclusions / Discussion PointsPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathway86% Reported within21 daysPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathway86% Reported within21 days

21. Conclusions / Discussion PointsPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issue86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?PSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issue86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?

22. Conclusions / Discussion PointsPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRI86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M0PSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRI86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M0

23. Conclusions / Discussion PointsPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRIPSMA- PET ↑ sensitivity for M1 compared to CT/BS86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M040% M1PSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRIPSMA- PET ↑ sensitivity for M1 compared to CT/BS86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M040% M1

24. Conclusions / Discussion PointsPSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRIPSMA- PET ↑ sensitivity for M1 compared to CT/BS86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M040% M1PSMA-PET-CT can be incorporated in to staging pathwayEquivocal PET-CT results not a major issuePSMA-PET ↑ sensitivity for N1 compared to MRIPSMA- PET ↑ sensitivity for M1 compared to CT/BSLittle evidence for ‘under-treatment’86% Reported within21 daysPET Radiologist MDT presence?20% N1M040% M195% eligible for Surgery or RT to Prostate

25. Conclusions / Discussion Points (2)Review of MDT criteria?Need to review PET at MDT?Ways to avoid additional CT & Bone Scan?Need to only request PET at MDT?

26. Thank YouRory Halley-HoggAmy HadleyJon AningLaquiesha Watts Kelly FogwillAlliance MedicalNBT CNS teamJulian KabalaRandeep KulshresthaIsabel LaurencePaul McCoubriePelvic Surgical TeamProstate MDT Julian KabalaRandeep KulshresthaIsabel LaurencePaul McCoubriePelvic Surgical TeamProstate MDT