Patrick Pine Chief Administrative Officer Robert F Kennedy Medical Plan What is the Robert F Kennedy Medical Plan A Taft Hartley Union Plan for Employers Contracted with United Farm Workers UFW ID: 912165
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Innovations Driven By Employers" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Innovations Driven By Employers
Patrick Pine, Chief Administrative Officer, Robert F. Kennedy Medical Plan
Slide2What is the Robert F. Kennedy Medical Plan?
A Taft Hartley (Union) Plan for Employers Contracted with United Farm Workers (UFW)Serves average of 3500 to 4000 employees and 10,000 to 15,000 total livesWorks with average of 40 employers
Most (85%) in California but some groups in Oregon, Washington, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas
Slide3How is the Robert F. Kennedy Medical Plan Structured?
Self insured, self administeredMedical benefits via a network with Anthem Blue CrossDental benefits via insured arrangement with United Healthcare
Vision benefits via insured arrangement with Vision Service Plan (VSP)Prescription drug benefits via insured arrangement with Express Scripts
Slide4Challenges Facing Employers Other Than Cost
Compliance with multiple regulatory requirementsDeveloping and maintaining and transmitting and receiving data securelyCommunicating required information and disclosures in multiple languages using multiple media
Recruiting , retaining , training and developing employees
Slide5What Has Not Worked for Us?
“Wellness” programs - Why not?Over last two years, the persons who incurred our most expensive claims: 77
year old spouse of an employee with chronic conditions; 65 year old spouse with chronic condition; 10 year old child;
two 55
year
old spouses
with chronic
conditions;
infant child; employee injured
in
a fall; teenage son hurt in a fight
None of our largest claims would have been mitigated by any “wellness” program
Slide6What Else Has Not Worked For Us?
Printed material – especially if in English and formal Spanish – Why not? Too much “legalese”; general aversion to print
material; medical terminology not understood
in
any language
Slide7Our “Success Stories”
Our Program with our consultants at Gallagher Benefits to RFQ/RFP/Bid Prescription Benefit Managers (PBMs)Our Program Relying on a Network of Providers based in Mexico – mostly Mexicali and Tijuana
Slide8RFP RX BID Process- Project Background
Robert F. Kennedy Medical Plan (RFK Plan)
currently contracts with Express Scripts
for its pharmacy benefit management (PBM) services through 12/31/2015.
RFK Plan engaged Healthcare Analytics (HCA), a division of Gallagher Benefit Services (GBS), to
assess the PBM marketplace
to ensure that they attain the best financial arrangement for the 2016-2018 plan years
The key to the analysis, and what clearly differentiates GBS from other consulting firms, is its in-depth evaluation of the bidding PBM’s
contract language
There is a direct link between variations in contract language and the overall financial impact for each PBM’s bid
In order to select the best candidate for PBM services, HCA conducted an extensive Request for Proposal (RFP) process which included an analysis of all submitted proposals
Slide99 PBMs were solicited for proposals
Costco and
Navitus declined to bid.
HCA’s analysis included, but was not limited to, the following parameters:
Review of bidding PBM’s
contract language
Review of the proposed
financial terms
to calculate the potential costs and/or savings projected over the contract term (using HCA’s proprietary PBM pricing model)
Evaluation of
questionnaire
responses
Comparison of the
unit cost and cost per day
amounts of highly utilized drugs in all networks; and
Review of the
Maximum Allowable Cost
(MAC) lists provided by each bidding PBM
RFP RX BID Process
Slide10Summary of PBMs Invited/Responding
Slide11RFP RX BID Ranking Process
Best and final offers (BAFO) were requested from the finalists identified in the original analysis
The results of these improved bids but did not change the results or recommendationsAs a result of the BAFO financial and scoring analysis, HCA concludes the following PBMs should be considered and participate in finalist presentations. Suggested ranking:
Benecard
(Pass-Through)
Switched administrative fee to PMPM (mistake)
Increase in cost (54K).
Express Scripts (Narrow)(Traditional)
Biggest increase in rebates ($143K)
Increase in discounts ($51K)
Optum
(Traditional)
Second best improvement in rebates ($96K).
Best increase in discounts (63K).
Slide12Best
and Final offers did result in better financial savings for each of the three
finalistsExpress Scripts had the biggest improvement in their offer
RFP Rx Bid Results
Slide13RFP RX BID Results
Best and Final Offers – adjustments made to original bid
Finalist
Discounts
Rebates
3 Year Enhanced Savings Projections
Benecard
Switch
to PMPM
($54K
increase
)
No Rebate
increase
$54,000
Cost increase
Express
Scripts (Narrow)
Better Discounts($51K over 3 years)Biggest increase in rebates($143K over 3 years)$194,000Optum Best Discount($63K over 3 years)Increase in Rebates
($96K
over 3 years)
$160,000
Slide14RFP RX BID Financial Results
Projected Total Cost Avoidance over the Contract Term (3 years):The 3-year savings figures below reflect the Best and Final bids from the
PBMs.Express Scripts the incumbent, had the greatest improvement over 3 years.
All but two of the vendors offered a financial improvement over the then current offer
Express Scripts Provided a greater than $1 million savings over the then current contract
Significant savings to the client for the next three years of their pharmacy contract
Slide15Our Mexico Provider Program
Several plans with employees and families near the border have long had programs using doctors, dentists, optometrists and pharmacies in Mexico. There are some hospital facilities that some plans also include.
Slide16Our Mexico Provider Program
Typically the providers are first “vetted” to assure quality. The providers are often included in medical tourism programs with American insurers.There are firms that specialize in creating networks for American employers such as SIMNSA.
Slide17Why Do Many of Our Members Prefer Mexico Providers?
Cost Savings Typically Mexico providers charge substantially less for same services than US providers
Overcoming Language Barrier Our Spanish speaking members prefer providers that
are primarily Spanish speaking
Slide18Why Do Many of Our Members Prefer Mexico Providers?
Familiarity Those Who May Have Grown Up in Mexico or Who Have
Family in Mexico Prefer Providers That They Are Familiar WithExcellent “Customer Service”
Many
of the providers provide transportation to
and
from
the US with expedited border crossings, some
provide
hotel lodging and food for patients and family
members
and many reportedly are better
than US
providers at communicating
with the patient
Slide19Example of Savings from Mexico Providers
Female spouse of member told by US doctor she needs a full knee replacement at total cost of $35,000 with Plan paying about $28,000 and her cost about $7,000 Mexico doctor recommends partial knee surgery without full replacementCost in Mexico about $3,500 with Plan paying about $2,800 and her cost about $700 plus
her travel costs ($500)Plan reimburses her about $500 in travel costs under its medical tourism policy
Plan Net Savings: $24,700 Her Net Savings: $6,800
Slide20What Else Are We Considering?
Various applications of “reference based pricing”Further use of “medical tourism” – both domestic and internationalIncreased use of data analytics