PPT-Common Barriers to Replicability and Retrieval in Systematic Review Search Strategies
Author : arya | Published Date : 2023-11-22
Whitney A Townsend MLIS Patricia F Anderson MILS Emily C Ginier MLIS Mark P MacEachern MLIS Kate M Saylor MSI Judith E Smith MSLIS Taubman Health Sciences Library
Presentation Embed Code
Download Presentation
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Common Barriers to Replicability and Ret..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Common Barriers to Replicability and Retrieval in Systematic Review Search Strategies: Transcript
Whitney A Townsend MLIS Patricia F Anderson MILS Emily C Ginier MLIS Mark P MacEachern MLIS Kate M Saylor MSI Judith E Smith MSLIS Taubman Health Sciences Library University of Michigan. With the increasing use of information and communications technology (ICT), researchers are able to use computer software tools to find, organize, analyze, and share relevant information. However, there are hundreds of such tools to select from, for various research-related uses. Nader has collected over 700 tools that can help researchers do their work efficiently. It is assembled as an interactive Web-based mind map, titled “Research Tools”, which is updated periodically. “Research Tools” consists of a hierarchical set of nodes. It has four main nodes: (1) Searching the literature, (2) Writing a paper, (3) Targeting suitable journals, and (4) Enhancing visibility and impact of the research. Several free tools can be found in the child nodes. In this seminar some tools and their application in research will be described. The e-skills learned from the seminar are useful across various research disciplines and research institutions. Joanne Yaffe . David Albright. Completing a Campbell Systematic Review . Society for Social Work and Research. Washington, DC. January 15, 2012. Mission: . . The Campbell Collaboration (C2) helps people make well-informed decisions by preparing, maintaining and disseminating systematic reviews in education, crime and justice, and social welfare.. Building a Culture of Research at an Academic Medical Center Through a Systematic Review Service. Agenda. Guiding Light. Online Request Form & Consultation Worksheet. All My Children. Systematic review service statistics. Systematic Review . Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT. Rehabilitation Health Science . What is a systematic Review ?. A systematic review is defined as “a review of the evidence on a . clearly. formulated question that uses . Database Selection, Search . S. trategies . & Reference . M. anagement. Christopher Stave, MLS. Instructional Program Coordinator. Lane Medical Library & Knowledge Management Center. objectives. Fiona Beyer on behalf of the Evidence Synthesis Team. Institute of Health & Society. fiona.beyer@ncl.ac.uk. Aims of this session….. What is a systematic review?. How to formulate an appropriate review question?. CRIMinology. Grads. Yolanda Koscielski, Librarian for Criminology, Philosophy, and Psychology. September 23, 2016. Content . PART 1: Broad overview of SFU Library resources and services. PART 2: A brief introduction to the graduate literature review. Steven Chang, . Senior Research Advisor (Library – Science, Health & Engineering). La Trobe University. Patrick Condron. Research Librarian (Medicine, Dentistry and Psychology). University of Melbourne. Steven Chang, . Senior Research Advisor (Library – Science, Health & Engineering). La Trobe University. Patrick Condron. Research Librarian (Medicine, Dentistry and Psychology). University of Melbourne. Fatemeh. Azimzadeh. Books. (Manning et al., 2008). Christopher D. Manning, . Prabhakar. . Raghavan. , and . Hinrich. . Schütze. . Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008. . I recommend testing your speakers before the webinar starts. Use the chat icon to ask questions to all participants or to the host only. Paul Cannon. College Librarian Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences. Irena Bond,. Associate Professor/Library Manager. Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (MCPHS). irena.bond@mcphs.edu. June 28, 2023. Goals. To provide a s. tep-by-step approach for properly conducting Systematic Reviews (SR) for beginners and junior researchers. Kate Brunskill. neurolibrary@ucl.ac.uk. www.ucl.ac.uk/ion/library. Menti. login. . Learning objectives. Explore advanced search methods, including: . defining the topic;. selecting search sources;. Whitney A. Townsend, MLIS. Emily C. . Ginier. , MLIS; Mark P. MacEachern, MLIS; Kate M. Saylor, MSI. Objectives. . To identify common characteristics of highly effective search strategies for a clinical systematic review topic..
Download Document
Here is the link to download the presentation.
"Common Barriers to Replicability and Retrieval in Systematic Review Search Strategies"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.
Related Documents