Bureau of Indian Education - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Bureau of Indian EducationDivision of Performance and Accountability

FISCAL MANAGEMENT

Special Education Funds

SY 2014-15 Fiscal Risk Level

Webinar – January 7, 2016

Slide2

To provide information on BIE,DPA Special Education Fiscal ManagementTo provide the 2014-15 Desk Audit findings

To initiate technical assistance to the schools

To provide a time for schools to request clarification, ask questions and provide input to delivery of technical assistance and training

The purpose of the training is:

Slide3

Training and information continues to be shared via webinars, emails, conference and phone calls

Due dates were adjusted to accommodate changes

Turn around of school staff

Native Star continues as the process to submit documents

FDDUnderstanding of CEIS

Challenges for SY

2014-15

Slide4

I. OverviewThe Fiscal Monitoring Procedures for Special Education ensures a school’s compliance to certain fiscal and administrative requirements for special education funds, 15% ISEP Academic base funds and IDEA Part B Supplemental Funds. Part B funds are allocated to the schools for excess costs of special education and related services and to supplement the ISEP 15% Academic base fund.

The school submits an application that provides assurances that the school will meet the requirements of Public Law 108-446

Fiscal Monitoring for Special

Education

Slide5

The procedure is established to ensure:Program and fiscal policies and procedures are developed and implemented to meet certain fiscal and administrative requirements;

Appropriate use of special education funds for the intended purpose, Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the Least Restrictive Environment (LRE);

Problems are identified and remediated; and

Oversight is provided that would result in improved student outcomes.

Fiscal Monitoring for Special Education

Slide6

Each school submits all fiscal documents in the

Native Star

link on the BIE website with the exception of the Unmet Needs Request. Each document, with a timeline, is used for the fiscal desk audit completed on each school in June.

II. Process

Slide7

1.The BIE reviews and rates the following fiscal documents:Local Education Agency LEA/School Part B Application

and if applicable, the

Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Plan;

BIE Web Budget

, BIE Operated Schools only; or Consolidated School-Wide Budget, Tribally Controlled Schools (TCS) only;Fiscal Accountability Self-Assessment (FASA)A. Desk Audit

Slide8

2. Fiscal findings of noncompliance identified during the desk audit process for which no written findings are issued, the following will apply:A) The school will be issued a warning notification for instances of noncompliance related to IDEA fiscal requirements

B) Targeted technical assistance will be provided to ensure instances of noncompliance are corrected within 30 school days of identification.

A. Desk Audit Cont.

Slide9

C) Findings of noncompliance corrected by the school will be verified through the review of the school’s required upload of fiscal evidence in Native Star or Native American Student Information System

D) Findings of noncompliance not corrected by the school within 30 calendar days will result in a written notification

A. Desk Audit

Slide10

3. The IDEA Fiscal Risk Level Scoring Sheet is used to communicate to the schools the risk level for each school

Low Risk: minimal concerns identified for meeting fiscal and administrative requirements

Medium Risk: concerns identified for meeting fiscal and administrative requirements

High Risk: numerous concerns identified for meeting fiscal and administrative requirements

Fiscal Risk Level

Slide11

4. Written notification of risk level is issued to the school5. Targeted technical assistance is provided to medium and high risk level schools

Fiscal Risk

Level Cont.

Slide12

An on-site visit provides an intensive level of fiscal review, and is the result of continuing violations of federal and IDEA fiscal requirements

B. On-Site Fiscal Review

Slide13

1. Criteria – if a school meets two of the five are used to identify a school for an on-site fiscal review:

Late submission or incomplete LEA/Part B application

High risk level for current and preceding years;

Administration Financial Reviews (BIE Operated Schools);

Recommendation for an on-site fiscal review from the Integrated Accountability and Support (IA&S) monitoring report;Indian Student Equalization Program (ISEP) Special Education Certification submitted by the Education Line Office (ELO) that identifies findings of noncompliance; and/or

Administration Financial Reviews (BIE Operated Schools) or Annual Report (Tribally Controlled Schools) or A-133 (Tribally Controlled Schools)

B. On-Site Fiscal

Review Cont.

Slide14

2. Written notification of an on-site fiscal review is sent3. On-Site Fiscal Review Activities:

Entrance meeting

Demographic data and budget

FASA and Fiscal Rating

Verification of expendituresEvaluation of fiscal review processExit meetingB. On-Site Fiscal Review Cont.

Slide15

4. Analysis of data collected during the on-site fiscal review5. Written report (also referred to as the written notification) issued to the school within 90 days of an on-site visit to inform of the intensive review results and if applicable, findings of noncompliance and corrective action.

B. On-Site Fiscal Review Cont.

Slide16

BIE identifies and corrects finding(s) of noncompliance as follows:

Schedule conference call with school(s) within 15-days of written report:

Review findings of noncomplianceProvide clarification/guidance

Review correction process

III. Fiscal Findings of Noncompliance and Correction

Slide17

Conduct quarterly progress checkpoints

Ensure timely correction on noncompliance

School corrects within required timeline

BIE verifies correction of noncompliance

BIE issues close-out letter within 30-days of verificationSchool does not timely correct; placed in continuing status of noncomplianceBIE issues written notificationBIE applies enforcementBIE verified correction

BIE issues close-out letter within 30-days of verification

Fiscal Findings of Noncompliance and

Correction Cont.

Slide18

The data from the desk audit and on-site fiscal review activities are analyzed and summarized to examine patterns and trends. The BIE offers training and targeted technical assistance to ensure fiscal resources are directed to areas needing improvement.

IV. Data Analysis

Slide19

An evaluation is performed to assist the BIE in improving the fiscal monitoring procedures, activities include:

School completes post-fiscal review evaluation form

BIE assembles representatives from the BIE Administration, BIE Advisory Board for Exceptional Children, ELO staff and schools to evaluate the fiscal monitoring process.

V. Evaluation

Slide20

School Part B Application: 3 PointsTimely submission (1)

Complete application (1)

Signature after School Board Approval (1)

BIE Web Budget/Consolidated S W Budget

K-8 Schools (19)K-12 Schools (23)FASA (45)CEIS (8)Desk Audit Process

Slide21

Regions

# Low Risk Schools

#

Medium Risk

Schools

#

High Risk

Schools

Total

Number of Schools

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

East

1

1

21

25

33

29

55

Navajo

1

1

20

20

40

40

61

West

2

2

16

16

42

42

60Total445761115111176

Fiscal Risk Desk Audit School Results

Slide22

Timely submission of the budget with appropriate signatures?Were there adequate allocations

and

justification provided to support the allocation?Fulltime Equivalency's (FTE) for personnel (Student/Teacher Ratio

Paraprofessionals

Special Education Teacher Supplies, materials, equipment and assistive technologyBudget Reviews

Slide23

Professional Development for total school staff, for special education staff, and/or provided based on needs of individual SWD.

Transportation as a related service for SWD

Parent Training

Child Find Activities

Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) placements in settings away from the school (incarceration, intensive specialized instruction or therapy, illness of student)Budget Reviews Cont.

Slide24

Most schools demonstrated appropriate use of Special Education funds in the following areas:TransportationPersonnel

Related Services

Special Education TeachersMajority of schools provided Budgets

Few entries of “Inappropriate

and Non Allowable Costs”Understanding the definition of Allowable CostUtilization of the Allowable Cost DocumentBudget Analysis

Slide25

Questionable Costs

Budget Item

Parent Training

Assistive Technology

Child Find

Equipment

Materials

Supplies

Staff

Training

Secondary

Transition Specialist

Work Study Programs

Slide26

Areas of improvement:The upload documents into Native Star

Internal controls

– describing the process for monitoring internal controls.

Separation

of dutiesAssessing of fiscal risk as it relates to theft & embezzlingTravel and training input of staff who attended, position and purpose

FASA Analysis

Slide27

Carryover

Inventory and safeguard to ensure fraud is not

occurring

Special education coordinator/lead teacher not involved in the verification of purchase of supplies, and contracts

.Justification of unusual itemsSchools will be issued findings of noncompliance if there are violations of IDEA requirements.

FASA Analysis

Slide28

Regions

Low Risk

Medium Risk

High Risk

TotalEast1340 17

Navajo

4

0

0

4

West

4

2

1

7

TOTAL

21

6

1

28

Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS) Data

Slide29

Schools will be issued findings of noncompliance if there are violations of IDEA requirements.

Schools received a score of 0 because:

a CEIS Plan was not submitted or was not submitted by the due date;

CEIS Cont.

Slide30

The CEIS rating was based on the following (8 pts):The Part B allocation was below the 15% Part B threshold (1pt)

The “Responsible Person” for CEIS at the school was identified (1pt)

The “targeted audience” was identified (1pt)

The School’s CEIS program was described (0-2 pts)

The number of student participants was provided (1pt)The entrance and exit tools and criteria were provided (0-2pts)

CEIS Cont.

Slide31

Examples of topicsProcedural Safeguards

(

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Overview of Special Education procedures & processes

Parenting a child with a

disabilityOverview of the Individualized Education Program (IEP)Developing your child’s IEPSupplementary aids & services; accommodations & modifications; Assistive TechnologyNurturing Self-determination

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Parent Training

Slide32

Assistance is available for parents100 Parent Centers across the nation at least one is located in each state

Sometimes they are referred to as Parent Training and Information Centers (PTIs) and/or Community Parent Resource Centers (CPRCs)

They help parents to participate effectively in the education of their children at school and at home, thereby improving outcomes for children with disabilities

Parent Training Cont.

Slide33

Native American Parent Technical Assistance Center (NAPTAC): Education for Parents of Indian Children with Special Needs (EPICS)

Parent Training Cont.

Slide34

Assistive technology devices or services, or both, are made available to a child with a disability if required as part of the child’s special education, related services, or supplementary aids and services.

The child’s IEP team determines if an assistive technology service and/or devise is necessary for the child to benefit from his or her education program

There are a broad range of assistive devices:Low-tech examples: pencil grips, highlighters, paper stabilizers, magnifiers, books on tapeHigh-tech examples: computers, computer based

a

ssistive technology, voice synthesizers, Braille readers Assistive Technology (AT)

Slide35

Accommodations/Modifications ExampleSkill Area: Written ExpressionAccommodations:

Method

Material

Technology

Accept outlines or notes to reduce written workCreate sentences aloudDo not grade for spellingExtra time for completion

Process reminders on

chalkboard or desk

Provide writing sample

Shorten assignments Study carrel for solo work

Pocket dictionary

Pocket thesaurus

Process reminders on

chalk board or desk

Electronic dictionary

Electronic thesaurus

Spell check

Use computer or word

process for writing

Use tape recorder to do

assignments verbally

Word Prediction

software

Slide36

There are many:Alliance for Technology Access Resource Centers

National Center for Learning Disabilities

Parent Training and Information Centers

Alliance for Technology Access

Resource Centers http://www.ataccess.orgCenter for Innovation in Learning http://www.edutopia.org/article/assistive-technology-resources

Education World

www.educationworld.com

AT Cont.

Slide37

is a component of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act that requires States and Local Education Agencies to identify, locate, and evaluate all children with disabilities residing in the State, regardless of the severity of their disabilities, and who are in need of special education and related services.

is a continuous process of public awareness activities, screening and evaluation designed to locate, identify, and evaluate children with disabilities who are in need of Early Childhood Intervention Programs or Special Education and Related Services

Child Find

Slide38

Examples of Child Find activities:The school publishes a child find notice in the local newspaper or the school’s newsletter

school participates in conjunction with community agencies such as

HeadStart, preschool services, and other area preschools; Child find notices are sent to all area clinics, doctors, preschools and daycare centers in conjunction with preschool screening

activities

All children entering kindergarten are screened to identify children with suspected disabilitiesChild Find Cont.

Slide39

The files of all children transferring to the school are screened to identify children who may have been receiving special services in their prior school

Parents of older children who enter the school for the first time are given a document, which explains the school’s special services and who to contact if they suspect their child may have a disability

For children attending the school ages 5 to 21, the primary child find process is parent and teacher referrals. In-service activities to assist teachers in making appropriate referrals are provided annually

Child Find Cont.

Slide40

The school student services team reviews the files of all students with a health plan to screen for suspected disabilities

Student Assistance Team (other names may be used) ensure appropriate interventions have been utilized to help the student overcome their learning problems before beginning a referral for special education services

Child Find Cont.

Slide41

Child find is integrated with ESEA:

Under ESEA, each LEA (school) must have an improvement plan developed to guide school and staff in the improvement of student performance for

all student groups in order to attain state standards. The school improvement plan must include strategies for improvement of student performance such as: instructional methods designed based on the needs of student groups not achieving; processes for addressing the

needs of children in special programs; integration of technology

in instructional and administrative program; positive

b

ehavior

supports; staff development for educators; and accelerated

instruction

Child Find Cont.

Slide42

Conduct school data analysis to determine improvement needs in the following areas:Equipment, supplies, materials

Staff Training

Include training on School Records and Confidentiality; Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)

Secondary Transition

Plan, Plan, Plan

Slide43

Gloria Yepa (505) 563-5264g

loria.yepa@bie.edu

Laura N. Tsosie (505) 563-5275laura.tsosie@bie.edu

Connie Albert (505) 563-5180

connie.albert@bie.edu Contact Information