PDF-UNPUBLISHEDUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSDARRELL BELO,Plaintiff-Appell

CITY OF HIGH POINT R E JONESpersonally and in his officialcapacity as a police officer for theCity of High Point JAMES YHOYNG personally and in hisNo 962236official capacity as Chief of Polic. JOEL SILVERMAN, M.D., in hisindividual capacity as committeemember and as Chairman for theDepartment of Psychiatry at theMedical College of Virginia;ROCHELLE KLINGER, M.D., in herindividual capacity a No. 99-1501STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTYCOMPANY,Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior Distric No. 95-2029UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCECOMPANY,Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.M. J. Garbis, District Judge.(CA-93-2943-MJG)A California Law Update. Christine Reed, Partner, Monterey Office. Kurt Bridgman, Partner, San Francisco Office. Chavez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th . 632. Facts. :.  . Plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury when the back panel of a “Free Motion” cable cross-over machine came loose and struck her head at a 24 Hour Fitness facility. When plaintiff joined the 24 Hour Fitness facility, she signed a Membership Agreement that included a release of liability. Under the release provision, plaintiff agreed that 24 Hour Fitness would not be liable for any injury she suffered as a result of 24 Hour’s negligence. Plaintiff and her husband sued 24 Hour Fitness for ordinary and gross negligence, premises liability and strict products liability. 24 Hour Fitness moved for summary judgment, arguing that the release in the Membership Agreement barred plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. . Christine Reed, Partner, Monterey Office. Kurt Bridgman, Partner, San Francisco Office. Chavez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th . 632. Facts. :.  . Plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury when the back panel of a “Free Motion” cable cross-over machine came loose and struck her head at a 24 Hour Fitness facility. When plaintiff joined the 24 Hour Fitness facility, she signed a Membership Agreement that included a release of liability. Under the release provision, plaintiff agreed that 24 Hour Fitness would not be liable for any injury she suffered as a result of 24 Hour’s negligence. Plaintiff and her husband sued 24 Hour Fitness for ordinary and gross negligence, premises liability and strict products liability. 24 Hour Fitness moved for summary judgment, arguing that the release in the Membership Agreement barred plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. . granted in part.]Peter S. Herrick and Neil B. Mooney , Esqs. for plaintiff.David W. Ogden , Acting Assistant Attorney General; Joseph I. Liebman , Attorney in Charge,International Trade Field Offic 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ARCHIE CRANFORD , Plaintiff, v. DUNU EYIUCHE , et al., Defendant s . 1: 1 6 - cv - 0 0 783 - FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LIJO PANGHAT , M.D., Plaintiff, v. BALTIMOR VETRANS AFFAIRS HEALTH CENTER , et al. Defendant s . Civil Action No.: ELH - 19 - 994 MEMORANDUM On January 23, 2019 , plain This complaint is part of ClassAction.org's searchable class action lawsuit database and can be found in this post: Riviera Loft Hotel Hit with Unpaid Wage Lawsuit 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU signed In addition at a state court hearing challenging the search in Nalis criminal proceedingWayne County Michigan circuit judge Judge Kym L Worthy stated on the record the magistratewas wrong in s Case 803-cr-00022-AW Document 56 Filed 03/20/09 Page 2 of 2On June 20 2003 the Honorable Alexander Williams Jr sentenced Doye to 188 months imprisonmentUSC 841 a1b1B and possession of a firearm EDWARD P BOWERS TrusteePlaintiff-AppellantNo 97-2507KUSE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATEDDefendant-AppelleeandJ R KUSEDefendantIn Re FLORIDA HOTEL PROPERTIESLIMITED PARTNERSHIP PLAN TRUSTAGREEMENTDebtorEDWARD Morgenstern v Town of Rye 147 NH 558 2002 In this case that parallels the US Supreme Court146s decision in Palazzolo v Rhode Island in 2001 the NH Supreme Court further staked out its position as a mo 1DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUTH Jonathan Frank andFrank Family TrustPlaintiffsCivil No 303cv1014JBAvArthur LoVetere et alDefendantsRULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISSDOCS 40 41 42 49 68On November 7 20