/
Safety Share Safety Share

Safety Share - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
402 views
Uploaded On 2016-10-11

Safety Share - PPT Presentation

Line Superintendent Report to IAEC The crew was doing a routine pole change out They were lifting a pole some of us may define it as pulling a pole The boom was nearly extended all the way out therefore causing even more leverage on the boom ID: 474479

pole boom pulling poles boom pole poles pulling overload lifting failure devices protection bent 000 prior manufacture change

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Safety Share" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Safety Share

Line Superintendent Report to IAECSlide2

The crew was doing a routine pole change out. They were

“lifting

” a pole

(

some of us may define it as pulling a pole). Slide3

The boom was nearly extended all the way out, therefore causing even more leverage on the boom.

No

overload protection devices operated prior to the boom failure. Slide4

My best guess as to the cause of the accident was boom fatigue over time from “pulling” poles and not “lifting” poles. I also speculate that the boom failed prior to the overload protection devices sensing the overload. Slide5

This is one of those events that no one is going to say anymore than they have to and management cannot prove otherwise. There was no push-back as it was made clear that all pole removals

require

the use of a pole puller.

It is

difficult

to say if our pulling/lifting actions were the cause or if there was indeed a premature mechanical failure of the boom. The possibility of

the

men or the truck manufacture coming forward to admit any fault is slim to none. Slide6

From today on

at “XYZ CO-OP”,

if another bent boom comes in, it will not be because of pulling poles and a very good, proven explanation will have to be provided as to why the boom is bent

.

DUECO was the manufacture.

Equipment is not designed to perform this task. Twin-screw

digger derrick

. Estimates are around $50,000. Slide7

WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO REMOVE POLES FROM THE EARTH?

Does your Co-op have an extra $50,000 laying around?

Should there be disciplinary action?

Is there a need for a policy change?