PPT-Simulated Convective-Radiative Properties in the MJO during

DYNAMOCINDY 2011 CH Sui YiAn Chen ShuYu Hou National Taiwan University NSA SSA 731E07S 72E73N 735E42N 79E69N 805E007N 805E8N Male. Fig. 3: As in Fig. 2, but at ten days after convective initiation.. Preferred ENSO Phase within Each Composite. Fig. 1: Histogram of ONI (°C) for (a) real MJOs and (b) failed MJOs. The sample size, mean, and standard deviation of each subset are provided in the top left corner of each histogram.. Webinar . Series. Dynamics of the Madden-Julian Oscillation Field Campaign. Climate Variability. . & Predictability. Shipboard Measurements of Aerosol Chemical, Physical, and Optical Properties during . Corrections. Peter Schnatz. Stony Brook University. Radiative. Events. In scattering experiments, a photon may be emitted by a charged particle due to . Bremsstrahlung. radiation.. This type of radiation is due to the deceleration of a charged particle as it approaches the . Challenges for the Next Decades. NASA Earth Science Division Workshop, NASA/Ames, 6-8 May 2014. Robert A. Houze, Jr.. University of Washington. Fair weather cumulus. Cumulus congestus. Cumulonimbus. Single cell. Factors affecting forecast skill of the MJO over the Maritime Continent. Augustin Vintzileos. CPC/NCEP . – . CICS/ESSIC. , University of Maryland College . Park. Jon . Gottschalck. CPC/NCEP. Problem statement:. imbalance . 1985-2012. Richard P. Allan. , . Chunlei. . Liu (University of Reading/NCAS Climate); Norman Loeb (NASA Langley); Matt Palmer (Met Office). r.p.allan@reading.ac.uk. @. rpallanuk. GEWEX 7. Nat Johnson. 1. and Dan . Harnos. 2. Stephen Baxter. 2,3. , Steven Feldstein. 4. , . Jiaxin. Feng. 5,6. , Michelle L’Heureux. 2. , and Shang-Ping Xie. 5. 1. Cooperative Institute for Climate Science, Princeton University. 8:00am . Talks, nominally 15 minutes, with time for questions and discussion. ..  . Jim Moum / BAMS outline. . Aurélie. Moulin / diurnal warm layer. Bill Smyth. Alan . Brewer.  . 9. :30 . coffee. GCMs. Nathan Arnold. 1,2. with Eli Tziperman. 1. , . Zhiming. Kuang. 1. , . David Randall. 2. and Mark Branson. 2. 1 . Harvard University, . 2 . Colorado State University. Tropical Dynamics Workshop. Adames. , A. F., J. M. Wallace, and J. M. Monteiro, 2016: Seasonality of the structure and propagation characteristics of the MJO. . J. Atmos. Sci.. , . 73. , 3511–3526.. Introduction. the convective centers in the MJO shift seasonally toward the summer hemisphere, following the belt of highest sea surface temperature (SST). . Christopher . Melhauser. and . Fuqing. Zhang. The Pennsylvania State University. Department of Meteorology. Group Meeting – April 11, 2013. Focus. How does the diurnal radiation cycle impact the . Jeremiah Brown and Ralph F. Milliff. NWRA, Colorado Research Associates (CoRA) Division. Boulder, CO USA. IOVWST Barcelona, May 2010. Multi-Platform Analyses of MJO Convection on Sub-Daily Timescales. . Overview of Model: Convection. . The convection scheme of . Emanuel and . Živkovic. -Rothman. . (1999) . uses a buoyancy sorting algorithm . and . represents an entire spectrum of convective clouds, from shallow, non-precipitating cumulus to deep precipitating cumulonimbus. Precipitation re-evaporates and drives an unsaturated downdraft that imports enthalpy and moisture into the subcloud layer. Re-evaporation of cloud water, resulting from entrainment of dry air, drives penetrative downdrafts within the clouds. The cloud base mass flux is continuously relaxed so as to produce near neutrality of a parcel lifted dry adiabatically, and then moist adiabatically, to the first level above its lifted condensation level. This maintains a form of boundary layer . Kengo. . Matsubayashi. Japan Meteorological Agency. The Met Office. Outline. Motivation. Observation and evaluation method. Evaluation result. Summary. In many convection schemes, water substances are empirically modelled..