/
Working with Judicial Decisions Working with Judicial Decisions

Working with Judicial Decisions - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
386 views
Uploaded On 2017-06-01

Working with Judicial Decisions - PPT Presentation

Part Two by Annette Demers BA LLB MLIS Judicial Decisions judicial decision public record majority are unreported only found at the registry office Judicial Decisions the Supreme Court ID: 554555

judicial case cases decisions case judicial decisions cases quicklaw court scc history law decision query prepare noting cited note

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Working with Judicial Decisions" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Working with Judicial Decisions Part Two by Annette Demers BA LLB MLIS

Judicial DecisionsSlide2

-judicial decision = public record-majority are unreported (only found at the registry office)

Judicial DecisionsSlide3

-the Supreme Court must report all of its decisions;-the Federal Court may selectively report;

Judicial DecisionsSlide4

-commercial publishers select and prepare for publication only a few decisions each year which are determined by the editors to have added something new / unique to Canada’s jurisprudence;

Judicial DecisionsSlide5

-judicial decisions can be found using a citation to the printed

reporter-if preparing for court you must provide a copy of the case from the printed reporter for cases predating 2000;

Judicial DecisionsSlide6

-judicial decisions are sometimes available from the website of the tribunal

-judicial and tribunal decisions are found on CanLii and Quicklaw

Judicial DecisionsSlide7

Judicial Decisions

If asked to research on a topic, first try:

a. Dictionary

b. Encyclopedia

c. Textbook or

looseleaf

d. Journal article

Use Secondary SourcesSlide8

Judicial Decisions

Do you have specifics? (Case citation, party name?)

Unique terms

Key Legal Issue properly stated

Synonyms

Truncation

Put it all together

Preparing for a Case Law SearchSlide9

Algorithm QLSlide10

Let’s Try it together!

Does the contract principle of “caveat emptor” (buyer beware) still apply in cases where the seller engaged in fraudulent misrepresentation? Slide11

Sample Query

“caveat emptor” /s “fraudulent misrepresentation”Slide12

You Try It! Prepare a

Quicklaw

Query

Using a negligence claim, could

a party

recover

the cost of

repairing

or replacing a dangerously defective product from a

manufacturer

where the defect caused an accident

resulting in

personal

injury

?Slide13

You Try It! Prepare a

Quicklaw

QuerySlide14

You Try It! Prepare a

Quicklaw

Query

negligence and (repair!

or

replac

!) and (dangerous! or defect!) /s product! and “personal injury”Slide15

Common Law Matters

Judicial DecisionsSlide16

Precedent

“Literally

“to stand by things decided,” 

stare

decisis

 is a rule that requires judges to follow or obey the rulings of other judges higher in the judicial hierarchy and is similar to the concept of a binding judicial precedent. When the facts in Case A are similar to Case B, the judge in Case B must follow the ruling in Case A if the judge in Case A is from a higher court in the same jurisdiction

.”

Tjaden

,

Legal Research and Writing,

(3

rd

ed

) (Irwin Law, 2010).Slide17

Note Up

In order to understand whether the outcome of a particular case is still good law, we must understand:

History of the case. Was the decision upheld on appeal?

Cases that have cited the case. Was the decision upheld in later decisions by higher levels of court, or was the decision overturned or modified in some way?Slide18

Note Up

Our Online databases provide electronic tools which help users to see

:

1.

History of case

2. Cases

that have cited other cases (judicial consideration).Slide19

Understanding the History of a Case1. Review the history line in an SCC decision.

Example: Locate Irwin Toy using SCC Lexum site.

Judicial DecisionsSlide20

Locating the History of a Case and Noting Up on

Quicklaw

Quicklaw

:

Locate the case

Choose “Note up with

Quickcite

Filter

Review carefully, determine relevant cases

Note up any relevant case to ensure it is still good lawSlide21

Noting Up – Let’s Do it Together!

Use

Quicklaw

to find any Supreme Court cases which have discussed this case:

2009

SCC 12Slide22

Noting Up – Cases – You Try

Quicklaw

Example:

Are there any Supreme Court cases which have

followed

:

R

v

Craig

,

 2009 SCC

23,

 [2009] 1

SCR 762.Slide23

Noting Up – Cases

CanLII

Look for this case on

CanLII

: 2008 SCC 9 (Dunsmuir).

Has this case been cited by the SCC?

Which of the resulting SCC cases has been most frequently cited?Slide24

Remember, there are rules in the McGill Guide which tell you when it is appropriate to include the history of a case in a case citation.

Case CitationsSlide25

THANK YOU!

Annette Demers

ademers@uwindsor.ca

http://www.uwindsor.ca/law/library

Judicial Decisions