/
WP5: Integration & Validation WP5: Integration & Validation

WP5: Integration & Validation - PowerPoint Presentation

briana-ranney
briana-ranney . @briana-ranney
Follow
395 views
Uploaded On 2016-04-20

WP5: Integration & Validation - PPT Presentation

IFREMER NERSC NIERSC ODL NAVTOR NERC 4 Tasks 2 Deliverables T51 Validation of remote sensing products IFREMER NERSC NIERSC ODL Months 1324 T52 Validation of the wave model IFREMER ID: 285957

ice validation wave model validation ice model wave task sea sar data 2013 amp nersc lines navtor months miz

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "WP5: Integration & Validation" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

WP5: Integration & Validation

IFREMER, NERSC, NIERSC, ODL, NAVTOR, NERCSlide2

4 Tasks, 2 Deliverables

T5.1: Validation of remote sensing products

IFREMER, NERSC, NIERSC, ODL

Months 13-24

T5.2: Validation of the wave model

IFREMER

Months 13-24

T5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

NERSC, NIERSC, NERC

Months 13-24Slide3

4 Tasks, 2 Deliverables

T5.4: Integration

NAVTOR, NERSC

Months 13-24

D5.1: Validation reports

NERSC

Month 24

D5.2:

Upgraded software

NavTracker

&

NavPlanner

to include waves-in-ice and ice forecasts

NAVTOR

Month 24Slide4

Total contributions from partnersSlide5

Task 5.1: Validation of remote sensing products

Validate independent satellite data from WP4 against each other and available in-situ data

.

SAR wave spectra (ODL)

n

ear MIZ: ice-free SAR wave spectra

f

ar MIZ: simple wave sensor (3-axis accelerometer) developed in SWARP (ready 2015

)

Other buoys

Ice

classification (MIZ area)

from

scatterometers

/radiometers (

Ifremer

)

Low resolution (25km)

from SAR/optical images (NIERSC

)

High resolutionSlide6

Generic

validation of wave parameters:

Altimeters (Hs & mss ): in ice-free water

Permanent buoys: general context (Iceland + Barents Sea )

WIFAR

2012 + other field data validation:

Detailed estimation of spectra, specific validation of wave attenuation rates

SAR-derived attenuation rates

5.1 Validation of the wave model

a) wave parameters

Ardhuin

et al. 2010

Ardhuin

et al. 2010

(Prévimer)

rms error for Hs (%)

Task 5.2: Validation of the wave modelSlide7

Fluxes

to ice, ocean and atmosphere:

Wave

energy balance ↔ wave momentum balance

Relevance for atmospheric forcing?

Input to the ice model (extra drag on ice) ?

Forced

vs

coupled modeling → implementation of OASIS3-MCT in WW3.

Possible

additional runs with IFS+WAM for wind stress diagnostics.

Validation of all « operational centers » with permanent buoys:5.1 Validation of the wave model b) fluxes to ice, ocean & atmosphere Task 5.2: Validation of the wave modelSlide8

Task 5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

In-situ

data from cruises (August-September 2012 & September 2013)

Two 5-day periods of drift, recording acceleration in 3 axes.

Other data: local thickness, wind, temperature, ambient noise

High resolution SAR for navigation (2013); wide swath SAR (2012,2013)Slide9

Task 5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

MIZ? Can make out at least 1

floe about 100m

in the ‘pack’.

Need to look at the floe size distribution in the pack to see what the lines correspond to. Slide10

Task 5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

Model results compared to SAR (red lines).

Concentration (AMSR2, 3.125km grid), thickness=1.5m.

Black lines:

D

max

=100m (Left), 110m (Right)Slide11

Task 5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

Model results compared to SAR (red lines).

Concentration (AMSR2, 3.125km grid), thickness=2.5m.

Black lines:

D

max

=130m (Left), 150m (Right)Slide12

Task 5.3: Validation of the sea ice model

Other possible data sets

Beaufort Sea 2011-2013 (Hwang et al, 2013):

18 SAR images

analysed

for FSD

Australian Antarctic SIPEX2 expedition (Sep-Nov 2012):

Wave measurements (

Kohout

) and FSD/thickness observations (video by Toyota

)

Images/analysis from WP4Slide13

Task 5.4: Integration

Making waves-in-ice forecast stable

eg

. back

-up options if some input data is unavailable.

Converting model outputs to correct format/grid

NAVTOR uses GRIB1 or GRIB2 (General Regularly-distributed Information in Binary form).

Transferal

of model outputs to NAVTOR servers.

Upgrading

NavTracker/NavPlanner

to include wave/ice information.