/
BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer

BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer - PowerPoint Presentation

brianna
brianna . @brianna
Follow
344 views
Uploaded On 2022-05-31

BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer - PPT Presentation

Kimberly A Dao MD Anna F Rives MD PhD Liza M Quintana MD Michael A Kritselis DO Michael DC Fishman MD Rutuparna Sarangi MD Priscilla J Slanetz MD MPH From the Departments of Radiology KAD AFR MDCF RS PJS and Pathology MAK Boston University ID: 912260

mass breast biopsy rads breast mass rads biopsy irregular left features imaging core year woman presented results mastitis benign

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

BI-RADS 5: More than Cancer

Kimberly A. Dao, MD

Anna F. Rives, MD, PhD

Liza M. Quintana, MD

Michael A.

Kritselis

, DO

Michael D.C. Fishman, MD

Rutuparna

Sarangi, MD

Priscilla J.

Slanetz

, MD, MPH

Slide2

From the Departments of Radiology (K.A.D., A.F.R., M.D.C.F., R.S., P.J.S.) and Pathology (M.A.K.), Boston University Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, 830 Harrison Ave, Moakley Building Suite 1300, Boston, MA 02118; and Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (L.M.Q.).

Address correspondence to K.A.D. (e-mail: kimberlyanhdao@gmail.com)

Presented as an education exhibit at the 2019 RSNA Annual Meeting and awarded a Certificate of Merit.

Disclosures.—M.D.C.F. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: advisory board member for Hologic; consultant to Zebra Medical Vision; provided expert witness case review for Abramson, Brown and Dugan; institution received a Strategic Alignment Grant from the Association of University Radiologists. Other activities: disclosed no relevant relationships. P.J.S. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: received royalties from UpToDate. Other activities: treasurer and fundraising liaison for the Association of University Radiologists.

Slide3

Review classic imaging features of malignancy classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (

BI-RADS) 5 at mammography, US, and MRI.

Be aware of a variety of benign entities that may manifest with BI-RADS 5 imaging characteristics.

Review radiologic-pathologic correlation for both malignant and benign BI-RADS 5 cases.

Understand the management of BI-RADS 5 entities after a benign biopsy result.

Slide4

A BI-RADS 5 assessment is used when the likelihood of malignancy is estimated to be greater than or equal to 95% on the basis of imaging findings. However, not all BI-RADS 5 lesions are malignant.

There are a variety of benign entities that may be categorized as BI-RADS 5, which prompt repeat biopsy or surgical excision when encountered at percutaneous core biopsy.

Radiologists should be aware of these BI-RADS 5 mimickers in order to provide optimal patient care.

Overview

Slide5

Imaging Features of Breast CancerClassified as BI-RADS 5

Slide6

BI-RADS 5: Mammography

Images in a 36-year-old woman who presented with a palpable lump in the right breast. Mediolateral mammogram

(a)

, mediolateral tomosynthesis image

(b), and magnification craniocaudal mammogram (c) show a large area of architectural distortion (oval) in the upper outer quadrant with associated pleomorphic microcalcifications (blue arrows) and right axillary lymphadenopathy (purple arrow). The results of core biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma.

Typical mammographic features that warrant BI-RADS 5 assessment include irregular mass with

spiculated

margin with or without associated distortion, fine linear branching or pleomorphic calcifications, segmental pleomorphic calcifications, or some combination of these findings.

a.

c.

b.

Slide7

BI-RADS 5: Mammography

Images in a 29-year-old woman who presented with a palpable lump in the right breast and axilla. US initially revealed a heterogeneous hypoechoic mass (not shown). Mediolateral oblique

(a)

and craniocaudal

(b) mammograms show segmental fine linear branching calcifications (blue arrows)

and

right axillary lymphadenopathy (purple arrow)

. The results of core biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma with metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Fine linear branching calcifications in a segmental distribution are highly suspicious for malignancy and warrant BI-RADS 5 assessment.

a.

b.

a.

(inset)

Slide8

BI-RADS 5: Mammography

Workup of a focal asymmetry seen at screening in a 47-year-old woman. Mediolateral oblique

(a)

and craniocaudal

(b) spot compression mammograms show an irregular high-density mass with spiculated margin (circle). US was performed subsequently (not shown). The results of US-guided biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma.

An irregular high-density mass with

spiculated

margin at mammography is suspicious for malignancy and should be classified as BI-RADS 5.

R

MLO

RCC

a.

b.

Slide9

BI-RADS 5: US

Workup of a right breast mass seen at screening mammography in a 53-year-old woman. Radial

(a)

and

antiradial (b) US images show an irregular, hypoechoic mass (oval) at the 3-o’clock position with spiculated and angular margin and an echogenic halo (arrows)

. The results of core biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma.

Typical imaging features of a BI-RADS 5 mass at US include irregular shape, non-parallel orientation, hypoechoic echo pattern,

spiculated

margin, ductal extension, and echogenic halo or posterior shadowing.

a.

b.

Slide10

BI-RADS 5: MRI

MR images in a 54-year-old woman who presented with a palpable lump and skin dimpling in the lower inner right breast. Images obtained with mammography and US (not shown) depicted findings classified as BI-RADS 5. Axial

(a)

and sagittal

(b) contrast material–enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR images and axial computer-aided detection (CAD) MR image (c) show an irregular, spiculated mass (arrow) with washout enhancement kinetics (added red closer to washout). The results of core biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma.

Typical MRI features that would warrant BI-RADS 5 assessment include an irregular enhancing mass with

noncircumscribed

margin and type II (plateau) or type III (washout) kinetic curve.

a.

b.

c.

Slide11

Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR image in a 54-year-old woman who presented with a palpable lump and skin dimpling in the lower inner right breast. The results of core biopsy indicated invasive ductal carcinoma.

Invasive ductal carcinoma. Invasive cords and nests of tumor cells infiltrate the breast tissue. Photomicrograph of a biopsy specimen stained with hematoxylin-eosin shows pleomorphic nuclei with prominent nucleoli, some glandular formation, and occasional mitotic figures. (Original magnification, ×200.)

BI-RADS 5: MRI

Slide12

BI-RADS 5 Management: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

As the likelihood of malignancy for BI-RADS 5 is estimated to be greater than or equal to 95%, all lesions should undergo percutaneous biopsy.

Various outcome analyses have shown that the positive predictive value for a BI-RADS 5 assessment ranges from 78% to 97.5%.

1

A

benign

result at pathologic analysis is considered

discordant

with the imaging findings and warrants repeat biopsy or surgical excision.

Some BI-RADS 5 lesions are ultimately found to be benign.

Slide13

Benign Entities Possibly Classified as BI-RADS 5

Slide14

Benign Entities Possibly Classified as BI-RADS 5

Atypical infection

Complex sclerosing lesion and radial scar

Fat necrosis

Fibromatosis or desmoid tumor

Granular cell tumor

Granulomatous mastitis

Inflammatory mastitis (autoimmune)

Lymphocytic (diabetic) mastopathy

Mastitis

Myofibroblastoma

Other benign entities (amyloidosis)

Slide15

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Atypical Infection

Images in a 76-year-old woman who presented with a palpable left axillary lump.

(a, b)

Left mediolateral oblique mammogram

(a) shows a dense irregular mass (pink arrow), which corresponds with US image (b) of the left axilla that shows a complex cystic mass (blue arrow). (c) Axial CAD MR image shows an irregular enhancing mass with washout kinetics (areas in red). The results of core biopsy revealed a Mycobacterium avium intracellulare

infection

.

Active infection can mimic malignancy. Correlation with clinical history and physical examination can aid in diagnosis, although biopsy is often necessary.

a.

b.

c.

Slide16

RCC

Atypical Infection: Pathologic Analysis

US image of the left axilla in a 76-year-old woman who presented with a palpable left axillary lump. The results of core biopsy indicated a

Mycobacterium avium

intracellulare infection.

RCC

Atypical infection. Photomicrograph shows non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation with associated lymphocytes, fat necrosis, and fibrosis.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×200.)

Bacterial culture results from this specimen were positive for

Mycobacterium avium

complex

.

Slide17

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Atypical Infection

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Palpable,

often tender mass

Mammography:

Irregular mass or axillary

lymphadenopathy

US:

Irregular mass in breast or axilla, enlarged axillary lymph node with or without necrosis

MRI:

Enhancing mass with or without necrosis

Bacterial cultures grow

Mycobacterium avium

or other atypical organism

Medical management with combination antibiotics to treat infection

Surgical intervention if medical therapy fails

Slide18

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Complex Sclerosing Lesion

MR images in a 45-year-old woman who presented for baseline high-risk screening. Sagittal

(a)

and axial

(b) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR images show an 8-cm irregular enhancing mass with spiculated margin (oval), which was classified as BI-RADS 5. A second-look US examination, subsequent US-guided core biopsy, and surgical excision were performed. US-guided core biopsy and surgical excision revealed a complex sclerosing lesion.

Complex sclerosing lesions and radial scars are common benign entities with suspicious imaging features, necessitating biopsy. The most common manifestation is architectural distortion depicted at screening mammography. The current recommendation is surgical excision in most cases because of the incidence of associated atypia or malignancy.

RMCC

Left

A

xilla US

b.

a.

Slide19

Complex Sclerosing Lesion: Pathologic Analysis

Sagittal contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR image in a 45-year-old woman who presented for a baseline high-risk screening. US-guided core biopsy and subsequent surgical excision helped confirm a

complex sclerosing lesion

.

RML

RMCC

Left

A

xilla US

Complex sclerosing lesion

. Photomicrograph shows epithelial proliferation with usual ductal hyperplasia, glands, cysts, adenosis, and apocrine metaplasia embedded in a

fibroelastotic

stroma. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×40.) The disorganized and haphazard architecture of the

complex sclerosing lesion

is evident.

Slide20

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Generally asymptomatic

Mammography:

Radial scar <1 cm

Complex sclerosing lesion >1 cm

Architectural distortion with radiating spicules to central

lucency

Occasionally, central

spiculated

mass with or without calcifications

US:

Architectural distortion without central mass

Occasional irregular, iso- or hypoechoic mass with or without posterior shadowing

MRI:

Architectural distortion with or without central

spiculated

mass and enhancement

Benign proliferative lesion with fibroelastic core with radiating entrapped ducts and lobules

Associated with malignancy in 4%–9% of cases (invasive ductal carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ)

Surgical excision for most cases (except incidental)

May be safe to follow if imaging findings are concordant, no enhancement at MRI, and the lesion is well-sampled and there is no atypia

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Complex Sclerosing Lesion

Slide21

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Fat Necrosis

Images in an 80-year-old woman who presented for routine screening. Left mediolateral oblique mammogram

(a)

shows an

irregular spiculated mass (circle) with microcalcifications, which corresponds to a left transverse US image (b) that shows an irregular, spiculated hypoechoic mass (arrow) with posterior shadowing at the 5-o’clock position. This mass was classified as BI-RADS 5. Core biopsy of the left breast was initially performed with a spring-loaded device and subsequently with a vacuum-assisted device as the initial biopsy was thought to be discordant. Results of both biopsies indicated fat necrosis.

Fat necrosis is a nonsuppurative inflammatory process that may be incidental at imaging. Clinical history of surgical or accidental trauma would aid in diagnosis.

RCC

RCC

a.

b.

Slide22

RCC

Fat Necrosis: Pathologic Analysis

Mammogram in an 80-year-old woman who presented for a routine screening.

Core biopsy of the left breast was initially performed with a spring-loaded device and subsequently with a vacuum-assisted device as the initial biopsy was thought to be discordant. Results of both biopsies indicated fat necrosis.

RCC

Right Breast US 10:00 Sagittal

Right Breast US 10:00 Transverse

Left Breast US 5:00 Transverse

Fat necrosis. Photomicrograph shows a dense infiltrate of macrophages, foamy histiocytes, and lymphocytes with associated cystic spaces. Dense collagenous breast tissue is present in the background.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×100.)

Slide23

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Fat Necrosis

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Palpable ill-defined breast mass

Sometimes bruising, skin tethering, or dimpling

Either painless or tender

May have history of trauma, surgery, or radiation

Mammography:

Asymmetry or radiolucent mass with or without coarse calcifications

US:

Variable:

Hypoechoic mass with posterior acoustic shadowing, complex mass, or hyperechoic mass

MRI:

Central fat signal intensity at T1- and T2-weighted imaging

Hemosiderin hypointense rim

Variable enhancement with peripheral thin enhancement or no enhancement

Early:

Cystic

spaces surrounded by lipid-laden histiocytes, foreign body-type giant cells, with or without acute inflammatory infiltrate

Chronic:

Fibroblastic proliferation, collagen deposition, foamy histiocytes, foreign body–type giant cells

Conservative

Slide24

RCC

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Fibromatosis or Desmoid Tumor

Images in a 47-year-old woman who presented with focal left breast pain. Mammography was unrevealing (not shown).

(a)

US image shows an irregular hypoechoic mass (arrow) involving the breast and pectoralis muscle with a large

feeding vessel (red area in

a

)

.

(b, c) Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated (b) and axial CAD (c) MR images show a suspicious irregular enhancing mass (circle) with mixed kinetics. The results of a core biopsy indicated fibromatosis.

Fibromatosis or desmoid tumor is a benign locally aggressive spindle cell tumor arising from the aponeurosis overlying the pectoralis muscle or occurs secondary to prior trauma or surgery. Management is wide surgical excision, given the high risk of local recurrence.

RCC

a.

b.

c.

Slide25

RCC

Fibromatosis or Desmoid Tumor: Pathologic Analysis

Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR image in a 47-year-old woman who presented with focal left breast pain. The results of a core biopsy indicated fibromatosis, and the patient subsequently underwent surgical excision.

RCC

Fibromatosis or desmoid tumor. Photomicrograph shows uniform bland spindle cells in long sweeping fascicles in a collagenous background.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification,

×100.)

The morphology and nuclear labeling with

β

-catenin (not pictured) support the diagnosis of desmoid fibromatosis.

Slide26

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Fibromatosis or Desmoid Tumor

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Premenopausal women with painless, palpable, firm mass, near or fixed to pectoralis muscle with or without nipple or skin retraction

History of trauma, surgery, or exogenous hormone therapy

Genetic mutations:

a

denomatous polyposis coli or

β

-catenin

Mammography:

Irregular,

spiculated

mass arising from aponeurosis overlying pectoralis muscle

With or without skin or nipple retraction

No lymphadenopathy

US:

Irregular hypoechoic mass with angular or indistinct margin

No posterior features

Variable internal vascularity

MRI:

Irregular,

spiculated

mass T1-isointense to hypointense and T2-hyperintense with variable enhancement characteristics

Benign locally aggressive spindle cell tumor

Spindle cells composed of fibroblasts or myofibroblasts, with little to no nuclear pleomorphism and variable amounts of collagen

Infiltrate ducts, lobules, and muscle

Lymphoid aggregates may be seen at the periphery

Wide surgical excision, given high risk of local recurrence

(20%–30%)

Slide27

RCC

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Granular Cell Tumor

US images in a 76-year-old woman who presented with an enlarging mass in the upper inner left breast that was shown at mammography (not shown). Left radial

(a)

and antiradial (b) US images show an

irregular, heterogeneously hypoechoic mass with an indistinct margin (arrow)

at the 11-o’clock position that was classified as BI-RADS 5. The results of a core biopsy indicated a granular cell tumor.

RCC

Granular cell tumor is a rare soft-tissue tumor originating from Schwann cells that may affect the breast. Imaging features mimic primary breast cancer, prompting biopsy. Management is wide local excision, as it is locally aggressive and 1% of cases are malignant.

a.

b.

Slide28

RCC

Granular Cell Tumor: Pathologic Analysis

Left

antiradial

US image in a 76-year-old woman who presented with an enlarging mass at the 11-o’clock position in the upper inner left breast. The results of a core biopsy indicated a granular cell tumor.

RCC

Granular cell tumor. Photomicrograph shows a granular cell tumor composed of infiltrating sheets and clusters of large round to polygonal cells with bland centrally located nuclei.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×100.)

The cells have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm with prominent granules (inset, original magnification

×600

). The tumor cells are positive for S100 and negative for

cytokeratins

(not pictured).

Slide29

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Granular Cell Tumor

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Premenopausal middle-aged women (more common in African Americans) with painless, palpable, firm mass, near chest wall, or asymptomatic

With or without skin retraction, nipple inversion

Associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 and

Bannayan

-

Ruvalcaba

-Riley syndrome, LEOPARD syndromes

Mammography:

Most common in upper, inner breast posteriorly

Irregular,

spiculated

mass without calcifications

US:

Irregular, hypoechoic mass with angular or indistinct margin

With or without posterior shadowing

MRI:

T1-hypointense mass with heterogeneous enhancement

Infiltrating sheets or cords of polygonal bland cells, abundant eosinophilic granular cytoplasm and round or oval nuclei with prominent nucleoli

May be near small nerve bundles and with infiltrative margins

Benign in 99% of cases

Malignant: spindling, nuclear pleomorphism, increased mitotic activity and necrosis, usually > 5 cm in size

Wide surgical excision

Slide30

RCC

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Granulomatous Mastitis

Images in a 37-year-old woman who presented with a palpable right breast lump. Initial mammography and US were negative (not shown). Axial

(a)

and sagittal (b) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR images obtained several weeks later show an irregular mass with rim enhancement and surrounding regional

nonmass

enhancement (blue arrows)

in the right upper outer breast, classified as BI-RADS 5. Second-look US image

(c)

shows irregular, heterogeneously hypoechoic masses (pink arrow) in the upper outer quadrant. Results of a core biopsy indicated granulomatous mastitis.

RCC

Granulomatous mastitis is a benign rare process affecting young women, mimicking inflammatory breast cancer. It is often associated with pregnancy and breast feeding. Management is corticosteroid therapy.

a.

b.

c.

Slide31

Granulomatous Mastitis: Pathologic Analysis

Axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat-saturated MR image in a 37-year-old woman who presented with a palpable right breast lump. Results of a core biopsy indicated granulomatous mastitis.

Granulomatous mastitis. Photomicrograph shows

lobulocentric

granulomatous and chronic inflammation with numerous granuloma rings with central neutrophilic clusters. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×40.)

Slide32

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Granulomatous Mastitis

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Reproductive-aged, parous woman, typically within 6 years of childbearing

Palpable lump, with or without pain

Mammography:

Negative, or asymmetry, irregular, indistinct mass(es), possible architectural distortion

With or without trabecular and skin thickening, lymphadenopathy

US:

Irregular, indistinct hypoechoic mass or masses

With or without edema, complex fluid collections, ductal dilatation, hypervascularity

MRI:

Irregular mass or masses with internal rim or heterogeneous enhancement

Regional, segmental

nonmass

enhancement

Primarily lobulocentric

noncaseating granulomas, neutrophils and lymphocytesNo organisms seen on special stains and cultures

CorticosteroidsSometimes surgery

Slide33

RCC

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Inflammatory Mastitis

Images in a 69-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer who presented with erythema, induration, and

peau

d’orange in the lower inner left breast. Left mediolateral oblique (a)

and left craniocaudal

(b)

mammograms and US image obtained at the 11-o’clock to 12-o’clock position

(c)

show a stable irregular mass (oval and arrow) in the lower inner breast but new skin thickening (curved line), which is suspicious for inflammatory breast cancer. Results of a core biopsy indicated lymphoplasmacytic granulomatous infiltrate consistent with lupus mastitis. The patient had a clinical history of systemic lupus erythematosus.

a.

b.

c.

Slide34

RCC

Inflammatory Mastitis from Lupus: Pathologic Analysis

US image at the 11-o’clock to 12-o’clock position in a 69-year-old woman with a history of left breast cancer who presented with erythema, induration, and

peau

d’orange. Results of a core biopsy indicated lymphoplasmocytic

granulomatous infiltrate consistent with lupus mastitis.

Inflammatory mastitis from lupus. Photomicrograph shows dense stromal fibrosis with perivascular and focal

perilobular

lymphoplasmacytic infiltrates.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×200.)

Some secondary follicles with reactive germinal centers (lymphoid aggregate at right) are present.

Slide35

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Inflammatory Mastitis

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Breast pain, swelling

With or without skin thickening, erythema, induration,

peau

d’orange

appearance

Sometimes fever

With or without clinical history of systemic lupus erythematosus

Mammography:

Irregular, indistinct mass or asymmetry with or without calcifications

With or without skin thickening

US:

Irregular, indistinct hypoechoic mass or heterogeneous area

With or without calcifications

With or without skin thickening

MRI: Ill-defined, heterogeneous rim- enhancing mass involving the subcutaneous fat

Hyaline fat necrosis, sclerosis, calcifications, lymphoplasmacytic granulomatous infiltration, and lymphocytic vasculitis

Medical combination therapy including antimalarial agents and corticosteroids

Surgery may trigger an additional flare

Slide36

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Lymphocytic Mastopathy

Left Breast

US

10:00

Images in a 63-year-old woman who presented with a palpable right breast lump. Right craniocaudal mammogram (a) shows an irregular mass with associated architectural distortion (circle)

. US image

(b)

obtained in the location of the palpable lump shows an

irregular hypoechoic mass (arrows)

at the 12-o’clock position with posterior shadowing. Review of the patient’s clinical history revealed long-standing diabetes. The results of a core biopsy indicated diabetic mastopathy.

Right Breast US 7:00 Sagittal

a.

A history of long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes may allow a BI-RADS 4 rather than 5 assessment and help avoid discordant biopsy.

2

b.

Slide37

Right Breast US 7:00 Transverse

Right Breast US 7:00 Sagittal

RCC

Lymphocytic Mastopathy: Pathologic Analysis

Right Breast

US

12:00 palp

US image in a 63-year-old woman who presented with a palpable right breast lump. Results of a core biopsy indicated lymphocytic mastopathy.

Lymphocytic mastopathy. Photomicrograph shows benign breast tissue with dense collagenized stroma and mild

perilobular

lymphocytic infiltration consistent with lymphocytic (diabetic) mastopathy. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×100.)

Slide38

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Clinical history of insulin- dependent diabetes (type 1> type 2) in 30- to 60-year-old women

Mobile, firm nontender mass or masses

With or without skin thickening, or asymptomatic

Clinical findings are often bilateral

Mammography:

Noncalcified dense asymmetry, or indistinct or

spiculated

mass

May be occult in dense breasts

US:

Hypoechoic mass or area with indistinct or

spiculated

margin and posterior shadowing

No internal vascularity

MRI:

Irregular T2-hypointense mass

With or without focal slow persistent enhancement

Keloidal fibrosis, epithelioid fibroblasts, and dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates surround lobules, ducts, and blood vessels. Lymphocytes are predominantly B cells

Core biopsy recommended to establish histologic diagnosis

Conservative:

Self-limited natural course with no risk of malignancy

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Lymphocytic Mastopathy

Slide39

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Mastitis

Images in a 38-year-old woman who presented with a palpable left breast lump and nipple pain. Right

(a)

and left

(b) mediolateral oblique mammograms show a global asymmetry (oval) involving the upper left breast with associated nipple retraction (blue arrow) and axillary adenopathy (purple arrow in b)

.

(c–e)

US images in the left breast at the 1-o’clock position

(c)

and 2-o’clock position (d) and in the left axilla (e) show ill-defined

hypoechoic nonmass findings with posterior shadowing (pink arrows) and

axillary lymph nodes with thickened cortices (purple arrows). These imaging findings were classified as BI-RADS 5. Results of a core biopsy indicated acute and chronic inflammation. Symptoms resolved after antibiotic therapy.

Mastitis can sometimes manifest with suspicious imaging features and necessitate biopsy.

RML

RMCC

b.

a.

c.

d.

e.

Slide40

Mastitis: Pathologic Analysis

Left mediolateral oblique mammogram in a 38-year-old woman who presented with a palpable left breast lump and nipple pain. Results of a core biopsy indicated acute and chronic inflammation.

RML

RMCC

LMLO

R

MLO

Left

Breast

US

1:00 palp

Left

Breast

US

2:00 palp

Left

Axilla US

Mastitis. Photomicrographs show acute and chronic inflammation, abscess, and

nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, left: ×40, right: ×100.)

Slide41

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Mastitis

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Unilateral breast localized pain, erythema, and warmth.

Nonspecific

symptoms

like

fever, malaise, fatigue,

and generalized body aches

Mammography:

Increased breast density, trabecular and skin thickening with or without subareolar ductal dilatation, axillary adenopathy

US:

Soft-tissue edema and skin thickening with hyperemia and increased echogenicity with or without ductal debris with ductal wall thickening

MRI:

Increased T2 signal intensity corresponding to edema,

nonmass

enhancement focally

Complication: Abscess, sinus tract, or fistula formation

Pathologic analysis:

Mixed acute and chronic inflammatory cells, 

with or without plasma cells, fat necrosis, abscess

Etiology:

Staphylococcus aureus

and

Streptococcus

 most common

Smokers: Squamous metaplasia of lactiferous ducts (SMOLD) leads to keratin plugs, duct obstruction, and infection

Antibiotics, warm compresses, analgesics

Puerperal:

Continue regular breast feeding and maximize emptying of the breast

Smokers:

Encourage smoking cessation

Abscess:

US-guided aspiration for drainage, obtaining culture and sensitivity

Slide42

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Myofibroblastoma

Images in a 61-year-old woman who presented for routine screening. Right craniocaudal mammogram

(a)

shows an irregular dense mass with indistinct margin (oval) corresponding to a transverse US image (b) of an irregular, hypoechoic mass with indistinct margin (arrow) at the 7-o’clock position and posterior shadowing. These imaging findings were classified as BI-RADS 5. Core biopsy results indicated myofibroblastoma

.

a.

b.

Slide43

Right Breast US 7:00 Transverse

Right Breast US 7:00 Sagittal

RCC

Myofibroblastoma

: Pathologic Analysis

Right craniocaudal mammogram in a 61-year-old woman who presented for routine screening. Results of core biopsy indicated

myofibroblastoma

.

Myofibroblastoma

. Photomicrograph shows short fascicles of bland spindle cells, bands of dense collagen, and admixed adipose tissues.

(Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification, ×100.)

Immunohistochemical stains (not shown) showed the lesion to be positive for BCL-2, CD34, estrogen receptors, and progesterone receptors, which are consistent with

myofibroblastoma

.

Slide44

BI-RADS 5 Mimicker: Myofibroblastoma

RML

RMCC

LMLO

Clinical Manifestation

Key Imaging Features

Key Histologic Features

Management

Palpable, painless mobile mass

Slightly more common in men than women

Mammography:

Solitary round or oval

isodense

to dense mass, 1 cm to 4 cm in size, usually no calcifications

US:

Circumscribed, solid, homogeneous hypoechoic oval or round mass, sometimes ill-defined with posterior shadowing

MRI:

Round or oval mass with variable T2 signal hyperintensity and internal enhancement

Benign tumor composed of packs of spindle cells, interposed thick bands of eosinophilic collagen

Complete surgical excision is recommended, as

myofibroblastoma

may recur if not entirely excised

3

Slide45

Benign breast lesions may manifest with imaging features that are worrisome for malignancy, leading to a BI-RADS 5 assessment.

A benign percutaneous biopsy result for a BI-RADS 5 assessment warrants either repeat percutaneous biopsy or excision.

The most common BI-RADS 5 mimickers are chronic and inflammatory mastitis, granulomatous mastitis, fat necrosis, complex sclerosing lesions, granular cell tumors, and infection.

Radiologists should be aware of benign BI-RADS 5 mimickers to provide optimal patient care.

Summary

Slide46

Cho SH, Park SH. Mimickers of breast malignancy on breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2013;32(11):2029–2036.

Heller SL, Moy L. Imaging features and management of high-risk lesions on contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MRI. AJR Am J

Roentgenol

2012;198(2):249–255.

Kim YR, Kim HS, Kim H-W. Are Irregular Hypoechoic Breast Masses on Ultrasound Always Malignancies?: a Pictorial Essay. Korean J Radiol 2015;16(6):1266–1275.

Mario J, Venkataraman S,

Dialani

V,

Slanetz

PJ. Benign breast lesions that mimic cancer: determining radiologic-pathologic concordance. Appl

Radiol

2015;44(9):28–32.

Spruill L. Benign mimickers of malignant breast lesions. Semin Diagn Pathol

2016;33(1):2–12.

Yao MM-S, Joe BN, Sickles EA, Lee CS. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging: outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors. Acad

Radiol 2019;26(8):1048–1052.

Suggested Readings

Slide47

References

Yao MM-S, Joe BN, Sickles EA, Lee CS. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging: outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.

Acad

Radiol 2019;26(8):1048–1052.Kim YR, Kim HS, Kim H-W. Are Irregular Hypoechoic Breast Masses on Ultrasound Always Malignancies?: a Pictorial Essay. Korean J Radiol

2015;16(6):1266–1275.

Raut P,

Lillemoe

TJ, Carlson A.

Myofibroblastoma of the breast. Appl Radiol 2017;46:42–44

.