/
Beam Secondary Shower   Acquisition System: Beam Secondary Shower   Acquisition System:

Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: - PowerPoint Presentation

bubbleba
bubbleba . @bubbleba
Follow
343 views
Uploaded On 2020-06-25

Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: - PPT Presentation

FrontEnd RF Design 2 Student Meeting Jose Luis Sirvent PhD Student 26082013 20dB 40dB 6dB pCVD Civi dec Amplifier Attenuator Civi dec Diamond Detector DC4GHz Splitter 6dB ID: 787605

qie10 noise amplifier lines noise qie10 lines amplifier 6db front adc study sigma shaper price pdf 20db splitter http

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition Syst..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Beam Secondary Shower Acquisition System: Front-End RF Design (2)

Student Meeting

Jose Luis

Sirvent

PhD. Student

26/08/2013

Slide2

-20dB

40dB

-6dB

pCVD

Civi

dec

Amplifier

Attenuator

Civi

dec

Diamond Detector

DC-4GHz

Splitter

-6dB

-6dB

DC-4GHz

Splitter

-6dB

34dB

-

12dB

-32dB

-

6dB

HV

12V

Tunnel

Surface

1. The dynamic range and the three lines

Front-End proposal

Termination

50

Ω

Fc= 5 Hz

Low Pass

Filter

DC

Not yet clear:

If DC measurement is necessary then -9dB splitter:

Needed lines 34dB, -15dB & -35dB

2. ADC or QIE10?

ADC

 Needed filters in lines 200MHz – 2GHz

QIE10 Needed

Amplif

DC-2GHz or no

Amplif

Problem for Long lines + QIE10??

Slide3

1.Front-End amplifier selectionOption 1: Commercial from Cividec

Price: 1755 CHF

Price: 1755 CHF

Slide4

1.Front-End amplifier selectionOption 2: Build our own amplifier with Gali + MGA Cheaper alternativeDevelopment of a board

Inside

Cividec

40dB

Gali

52 (Price: 1.2€) Agilent MGA-62563

(Price: 8.2€)Radiation Tolerance:

Tested in 2005

http://lhc-expt-radmon.web.cern.ch/lhc-expt-radmon/meetings/2005-03/Gorisek-BCM%20in%20ATLAS.pdf

Slide5

1.Front-End amplifier selection

Option 3: Evaluation Boards (20dB) from Mini-Circuits

(Price: 52

)

http://217.34.103.131/pdfs/GALI-52+.

pdf

http://217.34.103.131/pcb/WTB-409-52+_P02.pdf

Slide6

1.Front-End amplifier selection

Option 4: Build our own amplifier

with BJTs

http://www.intersil.com/content/dam/Intersil/documents/an15/an1503.pdf

Slide7

2. Noise study in lines (In simulation)

New!

Measured in SPS BA5

Slide8

2. Noise study in linesExample of digitalization with noise (Sigma=6.4mV)

ADC Shaper Off

QIE10

ADC Shaper On

Slide9

2. Noise study in linesEvolution of the Beam Sigma Error VS Noise

Considerations

:

The noise is white: Distributed in the whole spectrum

ADC Shaper On

 Still affected but working better than Shaper Off, in practice the results should be better.

The 40dB amplifier: Considered in simulations as ideal DC-infinite Hz (In reality RF 1MHz-2GHz)

The 34dB line in practice could not be used by the QIE10 since it has a high-pass filter, the value used should be -6dBObservations:QIE10 performs well by integrating , the mean noise value is 0 so in certain way integration filters noise.

As specked GausFit error increases with noise up to near 10% for these conditions and Noise sigma=102.4mVFor low noise (sigma < 1.6mV)  Best ADC Shaper ON / For high noise (sigma > 1.6mV)  Best QIE10

Slide10

-20dB

pCVD

Attenuator

Civi

dec

Diamond Detector

-6dB

DC-4GHz

Splitter

-6dB

-

6dB

-20dB

HV

Tunnel

Surface

2. Noise study in lines

For QIE10 we cannot amplify…so…

Long lines QIE10 Front-End proposal

Termination

50

Ω

Long CK50 link

(~100m)

Fc= 5 Hz

Low Pass

Filter

DC

QIE10

Slide11

2. Noise study in lines

For QIE10 we cannot amplify…so…

Considerations

:

Metres of cable considered for the simulations: 100m

In any case not taken into account impedance mismatching / reflections

Observations

:For same conditions in average QIE10 performs betterObviously in the previous case QIE10 part of the scan was amplified (by simulation) and therefore the SNR was better

Tendency shown as previouslyQIE10 performance affected by noise and lines attenuation (SNR)