/
PD24: Biases in Residency Match Interviews: PD24: Biases in Residency Match Interviews:

PD24: Biases in Residency Match Interviews: - PowerPoint Presentation

carny
carny . @carny
Follow
65 views
Uploaded On 2023-11-23

PD24: Biases in Residency Match Interviews: - PPT Presentation

2Year Comparison and How Urology Stacks Up Hayat Mohammed Tasha Posid MA PhD Dinah Diab BS Alicia Scimeca BA Hayat Mohammed Kathleen Puttmann MD Erika Garza BS Nicolette Payne MD Steven Goldenthal MD Vivian Wong MD Frank Begun MD ID: 1034682

2020 urology results asked urology 2020 asked results journal amp 2021 topics 020 030 match mohammed posid disparities 050

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "PD24: Biases in Residency Match Intervie..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

1. PD24: Biases in Residency Match Interviews: 2-Year Comparison and How Urology Stacks UpHayat Mohammed, Tasha Posid, MA, PhD, Dinah Diab, BS, Alicia Scimeca, BA, Hayat Mohammed, Kathleen Puttmann, MD, Erika Garza, BS, Nicolette Payne, MD, Steven Goldenthal, MD, Vivian Wong, MD, Frank Begun, MD The Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterDepartment of UrologyAUA 2021@TashaPosidPhD@OSU_UrologyContact: Tasha.Posid@osumc.edu

2. No Disclosures

3. Introductionwww.nrmp.org

4. Study Objective To investigate whether inappropriate interview topics were still being asked in the 2019-2020 (Year 1) and 2020-2021 (Year 2) Urology match cycles, and to identify disparities in who asked or was asked these type of questions. For this presentation: Disparities by GenderDisparities by Interviewer (i.e., who asked the question/s)Disparities by Urology vs. Non-Urology

5. MethodsREDCap survey sent to M4s participating in the MatchTimeframe:Post-interviews / pre-Match2019-2020:N=139n=79 Urology (57%)2020-2021:N=92n=55 Urology (60%)Survey metrics: Demographics; specialtySensitive topics brought up by: Applicant-applicationApplicant-interviewInterviewer-interviewAffect of these discussions on program perceptions and perceptions of ranking

6. Results Race/ OriginReligionSex/ GenderPregnancy StatusAgeCitizenshipPartner/ ChildrenUrology (all)0.180.080.030.030.030.050.36Non-Urology (all)0.050.050.070.020.020.000.31Urology (females)0.210.120.030.060.000.060.38Non-Urology (females)0.070.070.100.020.020.000.33Which of the following topics were discussed at your interview?

7. Results 2 Results

8. Results 3 Results

9. Results 4 Results

10. ConclusionsDespite there being a code of conduct from the NRMP:“illegal” questions are still being asked, are disproportionately asked of female applicants, are disproportionately asked by Senior Faculty, and candidates feel they need to mention these topics, even if not explicitly asked. Urology was a more frequent offender vs. other specialties Applicants asked these questions felt that it impacted how the program would rank them.These results suggest concrete work is still needed to promote equity and diversity, as well as applicant comfort, during the Match process.

11. References & AcknowledgementsSøreide, K. et al. (2020). The British Journal of Surgery.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Seminara, D. et al. (2020). The American Journal of Managed Care.Ochal, M. et al. (2020). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.Sheridan, D. C. et al. (2021). Acta Paediatrica.Kopec, G. et al. (2020). Kardiol Pol.References: Bohl, D. D., Iantorno, S. E., & Kogan, M. (2019). JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 27(14), 519-526.Match Communication Code of Conduct. (n.d.). Lee, J. S., Ji, Y. D., Kushner, H., Kaban, L. B., & Peacock, Z. S. (2019). Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 77(11), 2179-2195.Hern Jr, H. G., Alter, H. J., Wills, C. P., Snoey, E. R., & Simon, B. C. (2013). Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1116-1121.Hendrickson, K. R., Juang, T., Rodrigues, A., & Burmeister, J. W. (2017). Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 18(5), 336-350.Hern, H., Trivedi, T., Alter, H. J., & Wills, C. P. (2016).  Academic Medicine, 91(11), 1546-1553.Research Team:Alicia Scimeca, BADinah Diab, BSContact: Tasha.Posid@osumc.edu@OSU_Urology, @TashaPosidPhD@OhioStateUrologyResidencyLead Student Author: Hayat Mohammed