PDF-(READ)-The War on Informed Consent: The Persecution of Dr. Paul Thomas by the Oregon Medical

To preserve public vaccine policy Dr Paul Thomas was disbarred and discrediteddiscover how he was punished for pursuing the truth for his patients On December 3 2020 the Oregon Medical Board issued an emergency order to suspend the license of renowned physician Paul Thomas MD The ostensible reason was that Dr Thomas posed a threat to public health by failing to vaccinate his pediatric patients according to the CDCs schedule However the order came just days after Thomas published a peerreviewed study indicating that his unvaccinated patients were the healthiest children in his practice The medical board ignored this data despite having requested Thomas to produce peerreviewed evidence to support his alternative approach   Dr Paul started out practicing medicine the way he was trained to which meant vaccinating according to the CDCs routine childhood vaccine schedule But then he went on a journey of awakening becoming what he calls vaccine risk aware and arrived at a place where no longer in good conscience could he continue business as usual with this onesizefitsall approach He left a private group practice to open his own clinic with the foundational principles of individualized care and respect for the right to informed consent He wrote the VaccineFriendly Plan with Jennifer Margulis PhD to help parents navigate the decisionmaking process Then the accusations from the medical board started coming  The War on Informed Consent exposes how the medical board suspended Dr Thomass license on false pretexts illuminating how the true reason for the order was that by practicing informed consent he posed a threat to public vaccine policy which is itself the true threat to public health. Jeri R. . Barney. , JD, . MS . . Michele . Antisdel, . MBA/CCRP. HRPP Compliance Manager IRB Regulatory Analyst. Human Research Protection Program (HRPP). May 16, 2013. Discussion. Consent Process. San Bernardino/Riverside District Offices. Presenters:. Debra Brown, . PharmD. , Pharmaceutical Consultant. . Edwin Hoffmark, RN, Chief of RN Unit. State of California. Department of Public Health. Medical Consent Training. This training is for anyone who makes medical decisions for children in the legal custody of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS). This includes: . Foster parents. . th. Anniversary. An IRB . Infoshort. December 2013. Purpose. A statement of ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, including research on identifiable human material and data. Kathleen O’Malley RN, BSN, CCRP. Manager of Education and Training. Jefferson Clinical Research Institute. kathleen.omalley@jefferson.edu. Why is it so important?. Why is it referred to as a process?. Jeri R. . Barney. , JD, . MS . . Michele . Antisdel, . MBA/CCRP. HRPP Compliance Manager IRB Regulatory Analyst. Human Research Protection Program (HRPP). May 16, 2013. Discussion. Consent Process. Angela Bain, . IRB Administrator. abain@uga.edu. . 706-542-3821. Criteria for Approval. 45 CFR 46.111. 25 CFR 56.111. Minimized Risks. Reasonable Risk/. B. enefit Ratio. Equitable Subject Selection. MS-3 Case Based Series. 1. Updated . May. 2012. Objectives. Review ethical principles. Review principles of informed consent. Understand the role of confidentiality in patient care. Describe legal and ethical issues in the care of minors. and Refusal of Treatment. The notion of informed consent is a recent one. . Prior to the 1950’s, there was no firm ground in which a commitment to informed consent could be grounded. . It is important that we work to understand exactly what it means to make an informed decision, so that we can be certain that our patients are able to act autonomously. . Board Complaints and Hot Topics. Moderator:. Angela A. . Downes. , J.D., . Board . Member. Panel Members:. Donna L. Black, M.A., Board Member. Darrel D. Spinks, Executive Director of . TSBEP. Gail . Cheramie. Session Overview. Process and Documentation. Vulnerable Populations. Informed Consent of Non-English Speakers. Illiterate Subjects. Alteration/Waiver of Informed Consent. Informed Consent Process. Informed Consent is not just a form; it is an ongoing process of information exchange that may include:. Jeri R. . Barney. , JD, . MS . . Michele . Antisdel, . MBA/CCRP. HRPP Compliance Manager IRB Regulatory Analyst. Human Research Protection Program (HRPP). May 16, 2013. Discussion. Consent Process. Clinton Fuller, MD. Texas Children’s Hospital. Updated 10/2019. Disclosures. No relevant financial relationships. Learning Objectives:. Describe basic ethical theories and principles. List the elements of informed consent in adults. Anne Roussell, RN. Office of Clinical Research. QA Study Audits. The purpose:. provide . principal investigators (PI) and study teams . early . detection regarding study conduct . issues; . provide .