As of February 2014 Purpose Overview JROTC Accreditation Program standards components and timeline 2 FOUO History CCR 14583 Implemented 1997 Cadet Checklist School Checklist Program Checklist ID: 716508
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Accreditation Program Implementation Gu..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Accreditation Program Implementation Guidance
As of February 2014Slide2
Purpose
Overview JROTC Accreditation Program standards, components and
timeline.
2
FOUOSlide3
History
CCR 145-8-3: Implemented 1997
Cadet Checklist
School Checklist
Program Checklist
Unit Report
AdvancED
: Developed 2013Accreditation of curriculumFive standards
3
FOUOSlide4
5 Standards of Quality
Standard 1: Purpose and Direction
The school maintains and communicates a purpose and direction that commit to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning. This standard is informed by: JUMS – co-curricular activities, EIP evidence, Use of curriculum manager, Continuous Improvement project (rubric
)
Standard 2: Governance and Leadership
The school operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness.
This standard is informed by: Teacher Portfolio evidence that the JROTC courses and co-curricular support the local High School strategic plan and evidence that the instructor participates in activities that support the local school’s initiatives, School Compliance checklist with Principal.Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for LearningThe school’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning. This standard is informed by: Cadet portfolios and interviews, CM reports such as usage, standards assessments and quiz/test grades, unit reports, Instructor portfolio with professional development assessment, evaluations, evidence of local school participation in development activities, CI and Service Learning rubrics, drill or in-ranks inspection, lesson completion report, syllabi.
4
FOUOSlide5
Standards of Quality and How the JROTC Accreditation Program Informs Them
Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems
The school has resources and provides services that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. This standard is informed by: Inventory to confirm all Army supplied equipment is available, OMA funds spent to support student needs, Risk assessment evidence, evidence of appropriate referrals for students that need special services (tutoring, mentoring, free breakfast, etc.)
Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement
The school implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and school effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement. This standard is informed by Battalion Continuous Improvement Rubric
5
FOUOSlide6
ACCREDITATION COMPONENTS
Cadet Staff Briefing –
Bn
Continuous Improvement Plan
Service Learning Project Brief
Cadet Portfolio Interview
JROTC Instructor Portfolio Interview
LET 2 Drill School Checklist
Log Inspection
Curriculum Manager – Usage Report
Unit ReportSlide7
Instructor/Unit
Self-Assessment
DAI- SAI-AI
Compliance
Reporting
School – Unit - CM
Cadet Learning
Cadet Staff Briefing
Drill Assessment
Service Learning
Cadet Portfolios
Instructor Performance
Instructor Portfolio
Professional Development
DAI-SAI-AI
School/Program Compliance
Commendations and Recommendations
Score and/or Unit Award
Required Administrative Actions
Onsite Visit
Review Prior to Visit
FINAL REPORT
7
FOUOSlide8
Accreditation Award Designations & Program ComponentsSlide9
Leadership & Service Foundations
INSTRUCTOR PERFORMANCE
(SAI/AI)
COMPLIANCE
School – Unit- CM - Supply
No major changes
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS
2 & 4
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS
1, 3, & 5
SCORE
BRIGADE
ACCREDITATION CYCLE & UNIT
AWARDS
1
FAIL
– 1 YEAR VISIT AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
2
2 YEARS = MERIT UNIT || Follow-up as needed
3
3 YEARS = HONOR
UNIT || Follow-up as needed
4
4 YEARS = HONOR UNIT WITH
DISTINCTION || Follow-up as needed
NA
Assist
Visit
As Needed
Compliance Assessment
Alternating Years
DAI
Accreditation Visit
As needed and determined by brigade leadership
Modified from OIP
NEW
9
FOUO
ACCREDITATION STANDARDS
1,2,3,4,5
DAI Shop PERFORMANCE
(DAI/Staff)
NEWSlide10
TimelineSlide11
Implementation Concept
SY14 thru Full Implementation
:
Utilize
Assist Visits
to Prepare Schools for Accreditation Program
11
FOUO
Phase I SY14-15
Phase II SY15-16
IMPLEMENTATION
COMPLETE
Phase III SY16-17
1/3 Accreditation
1/3 Assist Visit
1/3 Monitor
Phase IV SY17-18
1/3 Accreditation
1/3 Assist Visit
1/3 Monitor
Pilot
(Fall)
10% of 1/3 due for formal inspection
Assist Visit
Determine DAI Performance Levels
1/3 Accreditation
1/3 Assist Visit
1/3 Monitor
Note: Bde will determine how to re-Integrate 10% pilot programsSlide12
CONCLUSION
Handouts and examples
Questions