Resources This lecture will help you understand Reasons for seeking alternative fuels Contributions to world energy by alternative fuels Nuclear energy The social debate over nuclear power Bioenergy ID: 691714
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Conventional vs Sustainable Energy" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Conventional
vs
Sustainable Energy
ResourcesSlide2
This lecture will help you understand:
Reasons for seeking alternative fuels
Contributions to world energy by alternative fuelsNuclear energy The social debate over nuclear powerBioenergyHydroelectric powerSlide3
Central Case: Sweden’s search for alternative energy
In 1980, Sweden’s people voted to phase out nuclear energy
The government has promoted hydroelectric, biomass, and wind powerSweden will still use nuclear power instead of fossil fuelsPublic support for nuclear power has increasedSlide4
Alternatives to fossil fuels
Our global economy is powered by fossil fuels
These fuels also power ⅔ of electricity generation Fossil fuels are limited and pollute
We need to shift to resources that are less easily depleted and environmentally gentlerSlide5
Conventional alternatives
We have alternatives to fossil fuels
They are renewable and less polluting and harmful But they are more expensive in the short term when external costs are not included in market pricesThe most widely used “conventional alternatives” to fossil fuels:Nuclear, hydroelectric, and biomass energyThey exert less environmental impact
These are intermediates along a continuum of renewability Slide6
The U.S. relies on fossil fuels
The U.S. relies more on fossil fuels and nuclear power than other countries
Conventional alternatives play minor, yet substantial, roles
The use of conventional alternatives has been growing more slowly than fossil fuelsSlide7
Nuclear power
Nuclear energy occupies an odd and conflicted position in our debate over energy
It is free of air pollution produced by fossil fuelsYet it has been clouded by weaponry, waste disposal, and accidentsPublic safety concerns have led to limited developmentThe U.S. generates the most electricity from nuclear powerBut only 20% of U.S. electricity comes from nuclear
France gets 76% of its electricity from nuclear power
Slide8
Fission releases nuclear energy
Nuclear energy
= the energy that holds together protons and neutrons within the nucleus of an atom Nuclear fission = the splitting apart of atomic nucleiThe reaction that drives the release of nuclear energy in power plants
This chain reaction keeps a constant output of energy
Nuclei of large atoms are bombarded with neutrons, releasing energy and neutronsSlide9
Nuclear energy comes from uranium
Nuclear reactors
= facilities within nuclear power plants Nuclear fuel cycle = the process that begins when uranium is minedRadioisotopes = emit subatomic particles and high-energy radiation as they decay into lighter radioisotopesThey become stable isotopes
Uranium-235 decays into lead-207
Uranium is used for nuclear power because it is radioactiveSlide10
Nuclear reactors use uranium-235
Over 99% of uranium occurs as uranium-238 (
238U)It does not emit enough neutrons for a chain reactionSo we use 235U, with a half-life of 700 million years
235
U is enriched to 3% and formed into pellets (UO
2
)
Which are incorporated into fuel rods used in nuclear reactors
After several years in a reactor, uranium is depleted
The fuel no longer generates enough energy
Spent fuel can be reprocessed, but it is expensive
So it is disposed of as radioactive wasteSlide11
Fission in reactors generates electricity
A
moderator = a substance (water or graphite) that slows the neutrons bombarding uranium Allows fission to begin in a nuclear reactorExcess neutrons must be soaked up
Control rods
= a metallic alloy that absorbs neutrons
They are placed into the reactor among the water-bathed fuel rods
They are moved into and out of the water to control the rate of the reactionSlide12
A nuclear power plant
The reactor core is housed in a reactor vessel
The vessel, steam generator, and plumbing are located in a containment buildingContainment buildings are constructed to prevent leaks of radioactivity due to accidents or natural catastrophesNot all nations require containment buildingsSlide13
A typical light water reactorSlide14
Breeder reactors make better use of fuel
Breeder reactors
use 238U (normally a waste product)A neutron is added to 238U to form 239Pu (plutonium)
They make better use of fuel, generate more power, and produce less waste
But breeder reactors are more dangerous than conventional reactors
Its highly reactive coolant raises the risk of explosions
Plutonium can be used in nuclear weapons
They also are more expensive
Most of the world’s breeder reactors have been closedSlide15
Fusion remains a dream
Nuclear fusion
= forces together small nuclei of lightweight elements under extremely high temperature and pressureDrives the sun’s output of energy and hydrogen (thermonuclear) bombsIf we could control fusion, we could produce vast amounts of energy from water
Tremendous energy is released when deuterium and tritium are fused to form heliumSlide16
Nuclear power delivers energy cleanly
Nuclear power helps us avoid emitting 600 million metric tons of carbon each year
Power plants pose fewer health risks from pollutionThey are safer for workers than coal-fired plantsUranium mining damages less land than coal miningDrawbacks of nuclear power:
Nuclear waste is radioactive
If an accident or sabotage occurs, the consequences can be catastrophic
The world has 436 operating nuclear plants in 30 nations Slide17
Coal versus nuclear powerSlide18
Nuclear power poses small risks, but…
It poses the possibility of catastrophic accidents
The most serious accident in the U.S. = Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979
Meltdown
= coolant water drained from the reactor
Temperatures rose inside the reactor core …
Melting the metal surrounding the fuel rods …
Releasing radiation
The emergency could have been far worse Slide19
Chernobyl was the worst accident yet
1986 explosion at the Chernobyl plant in Ukraine
The most severe nuclear plant accident ever seen It was due to human error and unsafe designFor 10 days, radiation escaped while crews tried to put out the fire
More than 100,000 residents were evacuated
The landscape for 19 miles still remains contaminated
The accident killed 31 people directly
Thousands more became sick or developed cancer
Slide20
The Chernobyl accident
The destroyed reactor was encased in a massive concrete sarcophagus, which is still leaking radioactive materialSlide21
Radioactivity from Chernobyl spread widely
Atmospheric currents carried radioactive fallout from Chernobyl across much of the Northern HemisphereSlide22
Smaller-scale accidents have occurred
Western reactors are safer than Chernobyl
But smaller accidents have occurredA 1999 accident in Japan killed two workers and exposed 400 others to radiationAging plants require more maintenance and are less safeRecent terrorist attacks raised fears that similar attacks could be carried out against nuclear plants
Or stolen radioactive material could be used in attacks
The U.S. “megatons to megawatts” program buys radioactive material from the former Soviet Union
Using it in power plantsSlide23
Waste disposal remains a problem
Spent fuel rods and all other waste must be put in a safe location
Where leaking radioactivity will not harm future generations Waste is held in temporary storage Spent rods are stored in water
U.S. plants are running out of room
Waste is now stored in thick barrels of steel, lead, and concreteSlide24
U.S. storage of high-level radioactive waste
Waste is held at 125 sites in 39 states
161 million citizens live within 75 miles of nuclear waste Slide25
Waste storage at Yucca Mountain, Nevada
It is safer to store all waste in a central repository
It can be heavily guarded Yucca Mountain, Nevada was chosen for this sitePresident Obama’s administration does not support itSo waste will remain at its current locationsSlide26
Yucca Mountain, NevadaSlide27
Benefits of storing waste at Yucca Mountain
It is remote and unpopulated
It has minimal risk of earthquakes that could damage the tunnels and release radioactivity Its dry climate reduces chances of groundwater contamination The water table is deep underground, making groundwater contamination less likely
It is on federal land that can be protected from sabotage Slide28
Concerns with Yucca Mountain as a site
Some argue that earthquakes and volcanoes could destabilize the site’s geology
Fissures in the rock could allow rainwater to seep into the caverns
Nuclear waste will need to be transported there
From current storage areas, and from future nuclear plants and military installations
Shipments by rail and truck over thousands of miles could cause a high risk of accident or sabotage Slide29
Dilemmas slow nuclear power’s growth
Concerns over waste disposal, safety, and costs have affected nuclear power’s growth
It is enormously expensive to build, maintain, operate, and ensure the safety of nuclear facilities Decommissioning plants can be more expensive than construction Power plants serve less than half their expected lifetimes
Electricity costs more than from coal and other sources
Governments must subsidize nuclear powerSlide30
The future of nuclear energy
75% of nuclear power plants in Western Europe will be retired by 2030
But some nations are rethinking this because of concerns over climate change Asian nations are increasing nuclear capacity 56 plants are under construction
The U.S. nuclear industry has stopped building plants
Expanding nuclear capacity would decrease reliance on fossil fuels and cut greenhouse gas emissions
Engineers are planning ways to make nuclear power plants safer and less expensiveSlide31
Bioenergy
Bioenergy (biomass
energy) = energy obtained from organic material that makes up organisms Wood, charcoal, agricultural crops, manureBioenergy has great potential for addressing our energy challenges
Over 1 billion people use wood for heat, cooking, and lightSlide32
Overharvesting and developing new sources
Biomass is only renewable if it is not overharvested
Overharvesting causes deforestation, erosion, and desertificationHeavily populated arid regions are most vulnerableCooking produces indoor air pollutionNew biomass sources are being developed
Biopower
= biomass sources are burned in power plants
Generating heat and electricity
Biofuels
= liquid fuels used to power automobiles Slide33
Biopower generates electricity
Waste products of industries or processes
Woody debris, crop residuesSpecifically grown crops (fast-growing willow trees, bamboo)Co-firing combines biomass and coalGasification turn biomass to steam
Pyrolysis
produces a liquid fuel
Many types of biomass are combusted to generate electricitySlide34
Scales of production
Farmers, ranchers, or villages use manure, wood waste, or biogas from digestion to generate electricity
Small household biodigesters work in remote areasThe U.S. has dozens of biomass-fueled power plantsBiomass power increases efficiency and recyclingIt reduces CO2 emissions and dependence on imported fossil fuelsIt is better for health and supports rural economies
But burning crops deprives the soil of nutrients
Relying only on bioenergy is not a sustainable optionSlide35
Ethanol can power automobiles
Ethanol
= a biofuel made by fermenting carbohydrate-rich cropsEthanol is added to U.S. gasoline to reduce emissionsIn 2009, 10 billion gallons were made in the U.S. from cornCongressional mandates will increase ethanol productionSlide36
Cars can run on ethanol
Flexible-fuel vehicles
run on E-85 85% ethanol, 15% gasoline8 million cars are in the U.S.Most gas stations do not yet offer this fuelBagasse = crushed sugarcane residue used to make ethanol
50% of new Brazilian cars are flexible-fuel vehiclesSlide37
Ethanol may not be sustainable
Environmental scientists don’t like corn-based ethanol
Growing corn impacts ecosystemsPesticides, fertilizers, irrigationTakes up land that could be left unfarmedEthanol competes with food and drives up food pricesAs farmers shifted to ethanol, corn for food droppedMexicans could not afford tortillas, and so they riotedGrowing corn requires energy for equipment, pesticides, and fertilizers
Its EROI ratio is about 1.5:1, so it is inefficientSlide38
Biodiesel powers engines
Biodiesel
= produced from vegetable oil, cooking grease, or animal fatsVehicles can run on 100% biodiesel
B20 = 20% biodiesel
Biodiesel reduces emissions
Its fuel economy is good
It costs a bit more than gasoline
Crops are specially grown
Using land, deforestationSlide39
Novel biofuels are being developed
Algae produce lipids that can be converted to biodiesel
Their carbohydrates can be fermented to make ethanolIt can be grown in ponds, tanks, or photobioreactorsAlgae grows fast and can be harvested every few daysIt can use wastewater, ocean or saline waterIt can capture CO2 emissions to speed its growthBiofuels from algae are currently expensive
Cellulosic ethanol
= produced from structural plant material (e.g., corn stalks) that has no food value
Switchgrass provides ethanol, habitat, and high EROISlide40
Two novel biofuels
Algae is a candidate for a next-generation biofuel
Switchgrass provides fuel now and may provide cellulosic ethanolSlide41
Is bioenergy carbon-neutral?
In principle, biomass energy releases no net carbon
Photosynthesis removes carbon that is released when biomass is burnedBurning biomass is not carbon-neutral:If forests are destroyed to plant bioenergy cropsIf we use fossil fuel energy (tractors, fertilizers, etc.)The Kyoto Protocol gives incentives to destroy forests for biofuel cropsOnly emissions from energy use (not land-use changes) are “counted” toward controlling emissionsSlide42
Hydroelectric power (hydropower)
Hydropower
= uses the kinetic energy of moving water to turn turbines to generate electricityStorage technique = water stored in reservoirs behind dams passes through the dam and turns turbinesRun-of-river approach generates electricity without disrupting the river’s flow
Flow water over a small dam that does not impede fish passage
Useful in areas away from electric gridsSlide43
A typical damSlide44
A run-of-river systemSlide45
Hydroelectric power is widely used
Hydropower accounts for 2.2% of the world’s energy supply
And 15.6% of the world’s electricity productionNations with large rivers and economic resources have used damsHowever, many countries have dammed their large riversPeople want some rivers left undammedThe U.S. government built dams to employ people and help end the economic depression of the 1930s
Engineers exported their dam-building techniquesSlide46
Hydropower is clean and renewable
Hydropower has two clear advantages over fossil fuels for producing electricity:
It is renewable: as long as precipitation fills rivers we can use water to turn turbinesIt is clean: no carbon dioxide is emittedHydropower is efficientIt has an EROI of 10:1As high as any modern-day energy sourceSlide47
Hydropower has negative impacts
Damming rivers destroys wildlife habitats
Upstream areas are submergedDownstream areas are starved of waterNatural flooding cycles are disruptedDownstream floodplains don’t get nutrientsDownstream water is shallower and warmer
Periodic flushes of cold reservoir water can kill fish
Dams block passage of fish, fragmenting the river and reducing biodiversity
Large dams can cause earthquakes or collapseSlide48
Hydropower may not expand much more
China’s Three Gorges Dam is the world’s largest dam
It displaced 1 million peopleGenerates as much electricity as dozens of coal-fired or nuclear plantsMost of the world’s large rivers have already been dammedPeople have grown aware of the ecological impact of dams and resist more construction
Developing nations with rivers will increase hydropowerSlide49
Conclusion
With limited fossil fuel supplies, nations are trying to diversify their energy portfolios
Nuclear power showed promiseBut high costs and public fears stalled its growthBiomass energy sources include wood and newer biofuelsThey can be carbon-neutral but are not strictly renewableHydropower is a renewable, pollution-free alternative
But it is nearing maximal use and can involve substantial ecological impactsSlide50
QUESTION: Review
Conventional alternative fuels:
Exert less environmental impact than fossil fuels but are currently not feasible
Are intermediate sources of fuel that can help us on
our path towards sustainability
Are final sources of fuel that will give us energy independence
Are no longer available for widespread useSlide51
QUESTION: Review
The reaction that drives the release of energy in today’s nuclear power plants is:
Nuclear fission
Nuclear fusion
Control rods
Nuclear emergenciesSlide52
QUESTION: Review
Why have nuclear power plants not been popular in the United States?
Fears about accidents or sabotage
Storage of nuclear waste is still not solved
High costs of building and maintaining plants
All are issues regarding nuclear energySlide53
QUESTION: Review
Ethanol in the United States is made mainly from ______, and is used to ______.
Soybeans, heat homes
Sugarcane, drive cars
Corn, drive cars
Willow trees, make electricitySlide54
QUESTION: Review
Which of the following is an interesting future biofuel?
Corn
Algae
Nuclear
Shale oilSlide55
QUESTION: Review
Which of the following forms of hydropower is least environmentally destructive?
The storage approach
Run-of-river approach
Bend-of-river approach
All of these are destructive forms and none should be used.Slide56
QUESTION: Weighing the Issues
Given the choice of living next to a coal-burning power plant or nuclear plant, which would you choose?
The nuclear plant, because it’s cleaner.
The coal plant, because it won’t be as likely a target for terrorists.
Neither one; I’d move to another place.
Either one; I don’t care.Slide57
QUESTION: Interpreting Graphs and Data
If ethanol in the United States continues to be produced from corn, a drawback suggested from this graph could be:
a) More corn is available for ethanol.
b) More competition between food and fuel.
c) Less land planted in corn.
d) None of these.