/
On the Implications of the Log-normal Path Loss Model: On the Implications of the Log-normal Path Loss Model:

On the Implications of the Log-normal Path Loss Model: - PowerPoint Presentation

celsa-spraggs
celsa-spraggs . @celsa-spraggs
Follow
385 views
Uploaded On 2017-12-24

On the Implications of the Log-normal Path Loss Model: - PPT Presentation

An Efficient Method to Deploy and Move Sensor Motes Yin Chen Andreas Terzis November 2 2011 What to do about the transitional region Place motes in the transitional region vs in the connected region ID: 617633

number trials normal log trials number log normal path loss region good transitional variation reality check connected temporal model

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "On the Implications of the Log-normal Pa..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

On the Implications of the Log-normal Path Loss Model: An Efficient Method to Deploy and Move Sensor MotesYin Chen, Andreas TerzisNovember 2, 2011Slide2

What to do about the transitional region?

Place motes in the

transitional region

vs in the connected region

Transitional region

2

Connected regionSlide3

Our ProposalOccupy the transitional regionPerform random trials to construct links with high PRRBased on the Log-normal radio model

3Slide4

Motivation: Placing Relay Nodes4Slide5

OutlineIntroduce log-normal path loss modelDiscuss pitfallsPresent the experimental results – reality check5Slide6

Log-normal Path Loss ModelReceived signal strength at a distance is , is a Gaussian random variableDue to artifacts in the environment (occlusions, multipath, etc.)Does not consider temporal variation 

Power of the transmitted signal

Path loss at distance

 

Path loss exponent

Random variation

Sender

Receiver

distance

 

6Slide7

Three Regions of Radio LinksAs the distance increases, we go through 3 regionsConnected: Transitional: Disconnected: ObservationThe packet reception ratio at any given location is random

 

7Slide8

Connected RegionIn connected regionPRR is very likely to be highTrying one location will likely produce good linkSenderReceiver

5 meters

8Slide9

Transitional RegionIn transitional regionPRR may or may not be highTrying a few spots should yield a good linkSenderReceiver

15 meters

9Slide10

Disconnected RegionIn disconnected regionPRR is very unlikely to be highTrying multiple spots seems worthlessSenderReceiver

40 meters

10Slide11

OutlineIntroduce log-normal path loss modelDiscuss pitfallsPresent the experimental results – reality check11Slide12

PitfallsLog-normal path loss model is not perfectThe Gaussian variation in signal strength is a statistical observationSignal strengths at nearby locations are correlated12Slide13

Reality CheckVerify log-normal path loss modelQuantify spatial correlationsCount number of trials to construct good linksInvestigate temporal variations13Slide14

Experimental Setup DevicesTelosB motesiRobot with an Ebox-3854 running LinuxEnvironmentsOutdoor parking lotLawnIndoor hallwayIndoor testbedTwo forests14Slide15

Evaluations on the Log-normal ModelHolds well in all the environmentsExample figure for the parking lotWe can subtract the solid line from the raw RSSI readingsThe residual RSSI values are samples of the random variable : 

15Slide16

Q-Q Plot of the Residual RSSI Values

16Slide17

Reality CheckVerify log-normal path loss modelQuantify spatial correlationsCount number of trials to construct good linksInvestigate temporal variations17Slide18

Spatial CorrelationPRR measurements at a parking lotiRobot moves in a 2-d plane (the ground)Black cell : PRR below 85%; Gray cell : PRR above 85%PRR are correlatedTrying two adjacent locations flipping two coinsIn

all

of our experiments,

1 meter is sufficient to remove most correlation

 18Slide19

Reality CheckVerify log-normal path loss modelQuantify spatial correlationsCount number of trials to construct good linksInvestigate temporal variations19Slide20

Number of Trials - ConfigurationGrid samplingBernoulli trialsNumber of trials to find a good PRR is geometrically distributed

distance

 

1 meter

20Slide21

Number of Trials - ResultsMeasure and compute the length of connected region Place motes at distances longer than  

21Slide22

Number of Trials – Fitting Geometric DistributionSuggests that 1 meter ensures independent trials.22Slide23

Connecting Two MotesMote AMote BRelay

TAR: number of trials to connect to A

TBR: number of trials to connect to B

TARB: number of trials to connect to both A and B

23

TARB

TAR

TBR

 Slide24

Reality CheckVerify log-normal path loss modelQuantify spatial correlationsCount number of trials to construct good linksInvestigate temporal variations24Slide25

Temporal VariationBox plots of residual RSSI values for two forests25Slide26

ConclusionLog-normal model fits sensornetsSignal correlation vanishes at 1 meter separationEasy to find good links in the transitional regionRule of thumb: at twice the length of connected region, number of trials is less than 5 with high probability26Slide27

Application – Placing Relay NodesNumber of relay nodes at large scalePlace 120 sensor motes in an area of size 800m by 800m Run Steiner Tree algorithm to place relay nodes27Slide28

Application – Mobile Sensor NetworksMobile sinkIf the current spot yields low PRR, move 1 meterMinimize travel distanceMobile motes Signal variation in the space domainSignal variation in the time domain28Slide29

Thank you!Questions?29