/
Principal Evaluation Process: FY16 Principal Evaluation Process: FY16

Principal Evaluation Process: FY16 - PowerPoint Presentation

celsa-spraggs
celsa-spraggs . @celsa-spraggs
Follow
423 views
Uploaded On 2016-11-10

Principal Evaluation Process: FY16 - PPT Presentation

December 22 2015 OCS Webinar Revisions for FY 16 Principal Evaluation ProcessInstrument Need AdvancED Improvement Priority April 2015 Review and align the administrator and teacher supervision and performance evaluation tools to reflect standards and benchmarks for effective schools in ID: 487068

principal school process evidence school principal evidence process catholic evaluation principals student data performance pastor assessment learning review agenda standards support aligned

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Principal Evaluation Process: FY16" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Principal Evaluation Process: FY16

December 22, 2015OCS WebinarSlide2

Revisions for FY 16 Principal Evaluation Process/Instrument

Need

AdvancED Improvement Priority: April 2015“Review and align the administrator and teacher supervision and performance evaluation tools to reflect standards and benchmarks for effective schools in order to enhance and impact pedagogy.”Slide3

Purpose for Principal Performance Review

Provides evidence to guide the development of each school leader’s professional capacity: an investment in leadership.

Provides each principal with feedback on his/her professional performance. Provides the pastor/juridic person with annual metrics on the principal’s professional performance. Provides the AoC system with an annual assessment on the quality of school leadership. Slide4

Principal Evaluation Committee

Reviewed the ISBE Performance Standards for School Leaders

: http://www.ilprincipals.org/resources/resource-documents/principal-evaluation/ipep/ILLINOIS%20PERFORMANCE%20STANDARDS%20FOR%20SCHOOL%20LEADERS.pdf

Decided that the ISBE instrument was good and could be used for AoC principals with appropriate modifications- especially in the area of Catholic identity.

Proposed a process for the annual performance review for principals.

Revisions to the ISBE document have been made at four meetings held between May-October 2015.

All principals in the AoC reviewed a draft of the revisions and a proposed process at the August 2015 Leadership Day. Slide5

Proposed Principal Evaluation Instrument

Six Performance Standards

Leading the Catholic Vision/Mission of the SchoolLeading and Managing Change

Improving Teaching and Learning

Building and Maintaining Collaborative Relationships

Leading with Integrity and Professionalism

Creating and Sustaining a Culture of High ExpectationsSlide6

FY 16 Principal Evaluation Process

Revised Process:

New principals Transfer principals AIM principalsPrincipals who volunteer to use the new process- per the approval of their RD/pastor- notify by Jan. 8

th

if interested.

FY 15 Process

All principals not included in the above groups

Self-assessment + review from pastor/juridic personSlide7

Principal Evaluation: Process FY16 for New, Transfer and AIM school principals

Who

: New/transfer principals and principals of an AIM school. (Approx. 60 principals.)Timeline

December 22, 2015:

Webinar for all principals being evaluated in FY 16 using the new instrument/process

January 13, 2016:

Review revised instrument/process with principals at New Leaders meeting

January

15, 2016:

Communication w/pastors re: revised process.

February 25, 2016

: Principal submits evidence for standards 1, 3 and 6

Between

March

18 - April 8, 2016

:

Principal meets with RD and pastor to discuss evidence/self-assessment/Catholic ID survey data

April

15, 2016

:

Hiring decision for FY 17 completedSlide8

Principal Evaluation Revised Process

Components to the Evaluation Process

Principal provides evidence for standards: 1, 3, and 6. An electronic AMT (Artifact Management Tool) will be created for each principal as a repository for his/her evidence.

Principal is

observed

by his/her pastor or juridic person (RD).

Principal completes a written

self-assessment

and discusses with his/her pastor/RD.

Principal receives

summative feedback

on his/her professional performance for FY

16. Slide9

Step One: Gathering

Evidence

Standard One: Leading the Catholic vision/mission of the schoolIndicators:

Ensures that the school’s Catholic identity, vision and mission drive school decisions.

Coordinates efforts to engage the

pastor,DRE

and families in support of the Catholic vision/mission of the school.

Ensures strong faith formation for teachers that results in certified catechists providing religious instruction; provides effective leadership to ensure that the school meeting academic and religious goals and provides students with an excellent Catholic education.

Ensures that religious instruction is aligned with AoC religion curriculum.

Ensures liturgical practices and Catholic culture are reinforced throughout the school day; provides opportunities for family participation in liturgical celebrations.

Fosters a culture of Catholic identity and evangelization that is evident in the life of the school. Slide10

Acceptable Evidence: Standard One

Indic.

Sample

evidence

a

School handbook

excerpts;

meeting agenda; formation activities with students/parents; back to school night presentations

b

Agenda from parish-school meetings; record

of attendance at parish events/meetings; Catholic identity statements in each classroom.

c

Certificates of certified catechists; enrollment data from catechetical training; evidence of professional development

activates/agenda

; data

showing student matriculation to Catholic high schools. Weekly communication to stakeholders.

d

Master schedule

shows dedicated instructional time for religious education/school liturgies,etc.; curriculum map for religious instruction; lesson plans; grade-level assessments; use of USCCB approved texts.

e

Schedule of school liturgies/liturgical events; records of student participation in sacramental preparation; pastor’s schedule

f

Evangelization efforts are evident on the school calendar, website, school publications and marketing materials. Slide11

Gathering Evidence

Standard Three

: Improving Teaching and LearningIndicators:

Works with staff to develop a consistent framework for effective teaching and learning that includes the approved AoC curriculum, research-based instructional practices and student performance at or above grade-level benchmarks.

Creates a continuous improvement cycle that uses multiple forms of data, including student work samples to support individual, team and school-wide improvement goals.

Implements student interventions that differentiate instruction based on student needs.

Selects, assigns and retains teachers with the expertise to deliver instruction that maximizes student learning.

Evaluates the effectiveness of individual teachers’ instruction by conducting at least one formal evaluation prior to annual renewal deadline and at least two informal observations per quarter/trimester with timely feedback on teacher

performance.

Ensures the training and development that support adult learning and development in order to advance student learning and performance.

Develops systems and structures for staff professional development including providing and protecting time allocated for this purpose. Slide12

Acceptable Evidence: Standard Three

Indic.

Sample

evidence

a

Lesson

plans/local assessments reflect alignment to CSIP; master schedule is aligned to instructional priorities; written curriculum map and/or scope and sequence. Classroom

walkthrough

data/feedback.

b

Continuous

School Improvement Plan(CSIP); faculty meeting agenda; on-site PD that supports CSIP and instructional needs of teachers. Data analysis sessions with faculty re: formative/summative assessments.

c

Classroom

observation data; lesson plans that reflect differentiated activities; RTI data and team minutes; assessment analysis aligned to instructional actions.

d

Documented interview and hiring process. Supervision/evaluation data; climate survey; exit interview data; documentation of mentoring/support efforts includes PD opportunities.

e

Documented supervision/evaluation process. Observation data/artifacts; written evaluations aligned to student achievement goals; action plans; evidence of fidelity to professional review process for each teacher

F

Agenda from

instructional team meetings; evaluation data

g

School-wide

PD plan aligned with CSIP; faculty meeting agenda; master scheduleSlide13

Gathering Evidence

Standard

Six: Creating and Sustaining a Culture of High Expectations

Indicators

:

Builds a culture of high aspirations and achievement for every student.

Requires staff and students to demonstrate consistent values and positive behaviors aligned to the school’s Catholic vision and mission.

Leads a school culture and environment that successfully develops the full range of student’s learning capacities- academic, creative, social-emotional, behavioral and physical.

Builds, creates and maintains a safe, clean and orderly learning environment.Slide14

Acceptable Evidence: Standard Six

Indic.

Sample

evidence

a

Teacher

websites; evidence of instructional differentiation; use of student tracker for formative/summative assessments; use of Aspire interims; use of Quizlets to support academic excellence and transition to Aspire; faculty meeting agenda; evidence of the use of technology to support learning.

b

Visual

evidence in the school that displays the school’s Catholic values. Student activities/speakers/presenter who/which reinforce Catholic values. Code of conduct included in school handbooks: parent/student and faculty. Anti-bullying program/policy understood and consistently enforced.

c

Fire inspection results; asbestos

report; safety committee agenda/reports. Annually updated safety/crisis plan. Documented communication with local police/fire departments. Staff receive annual PD to support school safety: CPR, epi-pen, AED, etc. Slide15

Step Two: Observation

Parish School

:Pastor: Observes principal interacting with school stakeholders: students, parents, School Board or Parish stakeholders, liturgical event: mass, prayer service, sacramental preparation, etc. Regional Director: 15 minute classroom walkthroughs (with principal 3-5 classrooms) before March 18.

AIM School

:

Regional Director: 15 minute classroom walkthroughs (with principal 3-5 classrooms) + observes an event with community stakeholders:

students, parents, School Board or Parish stakeholders

before March 18

.Slide16

Step Three: Written Self-Assessment

The self-Assessment is a reflection that includes goals* (2-3) related to Standards 1, 3, and 6 and should be aligned to the following:

AdvancED continuous improvementThe Catholic mission of the school * Goal(s) may also relate to operational improvements or improvement specifically communicated by the pastor or OCS. Slide17

Step Four: Feedback Session

When

: March 18- April 8 ( April 15th deadline for hiring decision for FY17.)Who: Regional Director, pastor*and principal

What:

Discussion of principal self-assessment submitted before feedback session.

Discussion of Catholic identity survey information.

Rating for FY 16: Distinguished, proficient or basic.

Hiring decision for FY 17: Deadline April 15

Possible goals for FY 17Slide18

January 13 New Leaders meeting

Review Principal Evaluation instrument: focus on Standards 1, 3, and 6. Review Self-Assessment form.

Review process for providing evidence to the principal’s Artifact Management Tool (AMT).Q&A about the process.