PPT-Study of the Hirsch conjecture based on “A quasi-polynomi

polyhedra Instructor Dr Deza Presenter Erik Wang Nov2013 Agenda Indentify the problem The best upper bound Summary Identify the problem Concepts Diameter of graph The graph of a . 1 The ABC Conjecture The ABC conjecture was 57519rst formulated by David Masser and Joseph Osterl57526e see Ost in 1985 Curiously although this conjecture could have been formulated in the last century its discovery was based on modern research in ET_16-1.indd 139 /03/13 9:19:42 AM Early Theatre16.1 (2013), 139 MINERvA. Kevin McFarland. University of Rochester. NuINT11, Dehradun. 8 March 2011. ν. Goddess′. μ. To India . via. Indiana. Thank you to the organizers . for their efforts to allow me to attend . MathematicsSubjectClassication.54C08.Keywordsandphrases.m-structure,(;s)-continuous,-quasi-irresolute,weakly-irresolute,-quasi-irresolute,m-compact,S-closed,m-quasi-closedgraph.c\r2005MathematicaM Research Objective. Show direct cause & effect. Study relationships among variables for existing groups. Explain outcomes after the fact. Type of Design. True Experiment. Quasi-Experiment. Cross-Sectional. . True Experiments. Characteristics. Threats to validity controlled by experiments. Threats not controlled by experiments. Obstacles to true experiments in the field. . Quasi-experiments. The logic of quasi-experiments . . C. r. e. a. m. Flavology. Source: . Readers Digest. , . Hidden Personality Traits Revealed Through Your Favorite Ice Cream Flavor. http. ://www.rd.com/slideshows/hidden-personality-traits-revealed-ice-cream/#. Ch. 2.1. Inductive Reasoning. - uses a number of specific examples to arrive at a conclusion.. used . in applications that involve prediction, forecasting, or . behavior . derived . using facts and instances which lead to the formation of a general . Searching for High Contrast Binaries with . ShaneAO. Lea Hirsch. 3. rd. Year Graduate Student. UC Berkeley Department of Astronomy. lhirsch@berkeley.edu. ShaneAO. Workshop . . . . Dec 17, 2014 at. Quasi-Experiments. Reminders. Hand in your papers!. Food day next time (5 extra credit points). Course evaluations: Solely evaluate me/lecture (you will complete a separate evaluation of . Xzania. /lab after Exam 3). Show direct cause & effect. Study relationships among variables for existing groups. Explain outcomes after the fact. Type of Design. True Experiment. Quasi-Experiment. Cross-Sectional. Longitudinal. Unconstrained minimization. Steepest descent vs. conjugate gradients. Newton and quasi-Newton methods. Matlab. . fminunc. Unconstrained local minimization. The necessity for one dimensional searches. To form conjectures through inductive reasoning. To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample. To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning. Example 1. You’re at school eating lunch. You ingest some air while eating, which causes you to belch. Afterward, you notice a number of students staring at you with disgust. You burp again, and looks of distaste greet your natural bodily function. You have similar experiences over the course of the next couple of days. Finally, you conclude that belching in public is socially unacceptable. The process that lead you to this conclusion is called. To form conjectures through inductive reasoning. To disprove a conjecture with a counterexample. To avoid fallacies of inductive reasoning. Example 1. You’re at school eating lunch. You ingest some air while eating, which causes you to belch. Afterward, you notice a number of students staring at you with disgust. You burp again, and looks of distaste greet your natural bodily function. You have similar experiences over the course of the next couple of days. Finally, you conclude that belching in public is socially unacceptable. The process that lead you to this conclusion is called.