/
Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker

Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker - PowerPoint Presentation

cheryl-pisano
cheryl-pisano . @cheryl-pisano
Follow
435 views
Uploaded On 2017-10-22

Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker - PPT Presentation

SKILLS Evaluate To carefully appraise or consider the statement and comment on the relative strengths and weaknesses as well as an overall judgement Discuss To present a topic from all sides with a reasoned argument for and against a particular issue You may add your opinion as part ID: 598465

parliament strengths strength weaknesses strengths parliament weaknesses strength weakness mark structure laws law effective contention elected maker introduction allocation

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Evaluate Parliament as a Law-Maker" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Evaluate Parliament as a Law-MakerSlide2

SKILLS:

Evaluate:

To carefully appraise or consider the statement and comment on the relative strengths

and

weaknesses, as well as an overall judgement

.

Discuss:

To present a topic from all sides with a reasoned argument for and against a particular issue. You may add your opinion as part of a balanced argument

.

Critically Evaluate:

To carefully appraise the value – considering both the strengths and weaknesses or the arguments for and against something.Slide3

Structure:

Introduction

Strength Vs Weakness

Strength Vs Weakness

Strength Vs Weakness

Conclusion

The amount of Strengths and Weaknesses vary depending on the Mark Allocation.Slide4

Mark Allocation

1 mark for overall structure – so Must include Introduction and Conclusion

stating your contention

1 mark per strength and Weakness (must be corresponding)

1 mark for substance (this has come from the examiners – those who elaborate and go into greater detail justifying why each is a strength and weakness receive the extra mark)

Lose ½ mark if you don’t have a contrasting word (whereas, however, on contrast to)Slide5

Mark Allocation Question

8 marks

How many Strengths and Weaknesses?Slide6

Structure:

Introduction:

Must state your contention: Is it effective or not? To a great/somewhat/little/no extent?

Like in an essay tell me what you’re going to be writing about e.g. you’ll be exploring the strengths and weaknesses of Parliament as a law-maker.Slide7

Introduction examples:

Example:

Parliament is an

effective

law maker with a great ability to make laws. Although its has its weaknesses, its

strengths generally outweigh these

.

Example:

In relation to Parliaments ability to change the law, they only are able to do so in a

somewhat effective

manner. Although there are any strengths to parliaments as a law maker there are also many weaknesses. Slide8

Structure:

Strength

1 Strength VS

Weakness

1x corresponding Weakness to the Strength

Example:

A

Strength

of Parliament is that is its primary role is to create laws, meaning it can devote all of its time, as well as its expertise and resources to the creation of legislation.

However

, a

weakness

of Parliament is that it is not always sitting. This delays the passage of bills and can be counter-effective in situations where there is a significant law that’s needs to be introduced/changed quickly.Slide9

Strength and Weaknesses Example:

Another

Strength

of Parliament is that members are elected and therefore uphold the principle of representative government. This ensures laws reflect the views of the majority and are therefore accepted and followed by members of the community.

However,

a

weakness

is due to being elected, members are sometimes more concerned with not being re-elected. This results in them not passing necessary but controversial laws, despite what the community’s views are.

Conclusion:

The fact that parliament are elected bodies, representing the views of the people most of time, outweighs the fact of Parliament only at times might not pass necessary and controversial laws, making Parliament an effective law-maker.

Option:

Can conclude after each Strength and Weakness

OR

conclude right at the end of all your strengths and weaknesses.Slide10

Structure: Conclusion Overall

Need to re-state your contention – It MUST be the same contention you identified in the introduction.

Re-state the key words in your Strengths and key words in your weakness to justify your overall argument/opinion/contention.

Example:

All in all, Parliament’s strengths of their primary role, the upholding of representative government, passing laws in future and their bi-cameral structure outweighs its weaknesses of the fact that they’re not always sitting, how they’re concerned with not being re-elected, their inability to see the future and the disadvantages of a bicameral structure. There have been many examples to prove that Parliament can make laws when issues arise and that they effective in doing so.