2 list at least one reason why you believe this is what you got for example did you study before the SAC Did you send in answers for Ms Hawkins to mark Evaluating Parliament as a LawMaker ID: 578965
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "1.) predict your score for your SAC" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
1.) predict your score for your SAC 2.) list at least one reason why you believe this is what you got for example did you study before the SAC? Did you send in answers for Ms Hawkins to mark? Slide2
Evaluating Parliament as a Law-MakerSlide3
Activity What words other than evaluate, require you to evaluate?Slide4
Think pair share Slide5
With all the knowledge that you have gained about parliament and the way in makes laws, think for 30 seconds about the pros and cons (strengths and weaknesses) of parliament as a lawmakerNow talk with your group about it and brainstorm your ideas onto the paper provided
Now share it Slide6
Although parliament has some significant strengths in law-making it does not always get it rightParliament is the sup
reme law maker and has at its disposal a variety of mechanisms that allow it to represent the interests of the people Slide7
How does this relate to the exam/SACThe end of year exam will often ask a question requiring you to evaluate parliament as a law maker
Evaluating an issue involves considering the advantages or strengths of the issue, as well as considering the corresponding disadvantages or weaknesses of the issue, and
making a judgment or argument
about whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or vice versa, or if, for example in this situation, parliament is still an effective law-maker despite its weaknesses
You must match up strengths with relevant weaknesses Slide8
StrengthsSlide9
Law making is Parliament’s primary roleSince law making is its chief function, it has strict procedures for the enactment of legislationIt can act quickly to introduce new laws
It has access to expert opinion to gather data from a variety of sources to ensure informed decisions about legislation Slide10
Parliament is democratically electedMembers of parliament are elected into office by community to represent them in law making (representative government)
Parliament is therefore
responsible
and answerable to the people
If people are dissatisfied with the representation given by a member of parliament then that member might face being voted out next election Slide11
Able to undertake investigationsParliament has committees and the power to establish investigative commissions to inquire into problems of law This also allows for public participation in law-making Slide12
Parliament can pass laws in futuroThat is, with the future in mindIt may anticipate a potential future situation and legislate to try and prevent or control it
The community is kept informed of these changes
In…Slide13
Parliament has set processes to ensure time and debate on new proposalsAny proposed bills go through debate and discussion process in one or both houses
This ensures all political parties and individual members have opportunity to voice concerns and views on behalf of their constituents
Furthermore, the process of a bill through parliament lessens the chance of unjust or unclear laws being passes Slide14
Parliament can delegate law making powers to subordiate authorities
Through enabling acts, parliaments give subordinate authorities power to make laws
These are expert bodies that are able to make necessary technical or
specialised
laws required in their area of jurisdiction
They have benefit of local knowledge
Closer and more accessible to public
This saves parliament time
Parliament has processes to check this delegated legislation Slide15
WeaknessesSlide16
Parliament is not always sitting, which means that the passage of important legislation may be delayed during parliamentary recessesMembers of parliament are subject to political influence
-this could mean parliament is preoccupied with passing popular laws, rather than necessary but controversial laws
Parliamentary investigations and consultations on issues are
time consuming and expensive
and could delay legislative changeSlide17
Parliament cannot be expected to be able to foresee all future situations or community needs and legislate accordingly Parliament can also make laws retrospectively, which is legislation that is applicable to situations that occurred before the passage of a bill-this may result in an unfair situation if a person did something that is lawful at the time, but becomes unlawful at a later dateSlide18
The government by definition hold the majority of seats in the Lower House of Parliament If it also hold majority in upper house, there is a danger of “
rubber stamp
” effect
This means that a bill passes automatically if government members vote on party lines
On contrast if the party/coalition that holds government in the lower house does not have majority in the upper house then it can become a
hostile upper house
– where bills are rejected based upon policies rather than what is necessary for the community Slide19
By delegating power to subordinate authorities, parliament is giving up law making power to unelected, undemocratic bodies.Laws are passed quickly, but this is due to lack of debate in law-making processSlide20
Strengths of parliament as a law-maker
Weaknesses of parliament as a law-maker
Law making is Parliament’s primary role
-
has
strict procedures for the enactment of legislation.
It can act quickly to introduce new laws. It has access to expert opinion to gather data from a variety of sources to ensure informed decisions about legislation
Parliament is not always sitting, which means that the passage of important legislation may be delayed during parliamentary recesses
Parliament is democratically elected -
Members of parliament are
elected into office
by community to represent them in law making (representative government)
Members of parliament are subject to
political influence
-this could mean parliament is preoccupied with passing popular laws, rather than necessary but controversial laws
Parliament can abrogate common law –
if they feel that a court has made an error in their decision in a case they can override this decision for example in the
Trigwell
case. Alternatively they can also codify their decision and pass law to implement it
Parliamentary investigations and consultations on issues are
time consuming and expensive
and could delay legislative changeSlide21
Strengths
Corresponding
w
eaknesses
Parliament can pass laws
in
futuro
-
That is, with the future in mind.
It may anticipate a potential future situation and legislate to try and prevent or control it. The community is kept informed of these changes
Parliament cannot be expected to be able to foresee all future situations or community needs and legislate accordingly
Parliament has set processes to ensure time and debate on new proposals
-
Any proposed bills go through debate and discussion process in one or both houses
This ensures all political parties and individual members have opportunity to voice concerns and views on behalf of their constituents.
Rubber stamp effect –
if the same party is
in power in the upper house as is in the lower house, bills will not be debated fully and may just be passed through due to party policy/voting along party lines
Hostile
upper house –
if the opposition is in power in the upper house, it is their prerogative to disagree with the opposing party’s policies therefore they are likely to reject most bills meaning important legislation does not get passed
Strength
Weakness
Parliament can abrogate common law –
if they feel that a court has made an error in their decision in a case they can override this
decision.
Alternatively they can also codify their decision and pass law to implement it
–
eg
Native Title
Parliamentarians
are often concerned more with re-election that creating necessary laws, leaving this up to the courts, as seen in Abortion law. Slide22
Strength
Weakness
Parliament can abrogate common law –
if they feel that a court has made an error in their decision in a case they can override this decision for example in the
Trigwell
case. Alternatively they can also codify their decision and pass law to implement it
Parliamentarians
are often concerned more with re-election that creating necessary laws, leaving this up to the courts, as seen in Abortion law. Slide23
Once again…In relation to this topic, it is often a large mark question that will be asked on a SAC or in the examKnow a variety of strengths and their corresponding weaknesses
DO NOT forget to evaluate. That is, to make a judgment on whether or not, despite its weaknesses, parliament is STILL an effective law-maker
Even though it DOES have some weaknesses, as it is our supreme law-making body, it is often thought that it is still an effective law-maker Slide24
Find my strength activity Slide25
Task choose one strength the evaluate in your table group. Correlate it with its corresponding weakness