PPT-Rating Teacher Performance on Standard 7 Using Student Achi

Rating Teacher Performance on Standard 7 Using Student Achievement Goal Setting Professional s Name Teacher H Worksite Yourtown High School Job Title English Teacher School Year . Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Teachers: Two Tiers.  . . Performance Standard.   . Performance Indicator. Performance Indicator. Performance Indicator.  . The teacher:. 0. August 2012. What. is the basis of teacher evaluation?. How will teacher performance be documented?. How will teacher performance be rated?. Teacher Performance Evaluation System. 1. What. is the basis of teacher evaluation?. 1. Code of Virginia. § 22.1-294. Principals and assistant principals who have achieved continuing contract status shall be formally evaluated at least once every three years and evaluated informally at least once each year that they are not formally evaluated. Probationary principals and assistant principals shall be evaluated each school year. . Who is where and what rights are attached. ETA/U46 Teacher Appraisal Plan (TAP). During the Summative Conference both a TAP rating and an ISBE rating are determined.. Key background information. ETA/U46 Teacher Appraisal Plan (TAP). STANDARD. EVIDENCE. Standard 1 - Professional Knowledge. Documentation. and Observation. Standard. 2 - Instructional Planning. Documentation. and Observation. Standard 3 - Instructional Delivery. Observation. Implementing Standard 7. 0. August 2012. Standard 7: . Student Academic Progress. Code of Virginia. School boards shall develop a procedure for use by division superintendents and principals in evaluating instructional personnel that is appropriate to the tasks performed and addresses, among other things, . Guide. Overview. This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for teachers in AchieveNJ.. Each element of the evaluation results in a 1 - 4 rating, which is weighted according to state formulas shown in later slides.. Melissa LaBerge, Principal. ABOUT US . To challenge and empower our students to be successful in a highly competitive world.. Building upon our rich, . Lowcountry. traditions. , we will ignite in every student a passion for life-long learning. Through dynamic instruction, creative partnerships and exceptional support, we will foster opportunities for each student to build a . 2013-14. Overview. This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for teachers in . AchieveNJ. .. Each element of the evaluation results in a 1 - 4 rating, which is weighted according to state formulas shown in later slides.. Office of Human Resources. Office of Professional Development & Evaluation. Outcome of M-DCPS systemic implementation of Human Capital Management initiatives. Legislative mandates. Educator Evaluation. Overview of . t. he Model to Measure Student Learning Growth on FCAT . January 2012 . 1. As . set forth in the . Student Success Act . and . Race to the Top. , teacher evaluations are. :. Designed to support effective instruction and student learning . Online modules. Module 1:. Teacher Effectiveness System Overview. History. Minimum Requirements. Timeline . Summative Rating Matrix. Professional Oversight: Is the rating fair and accurate based on the evidence . The teacher candidate understands how students learn, develop and differ in their approaches to learning. The teacher candidate provides learning opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners and The teacher candidate understands how students learn, develop and differ in their approaches to learning. The teacher candidate provides learning opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners and