PDF-UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff,

Author : cheryl-pisano | Published Date : 2015-11-02

2 10 28 Case No A PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential proprietary or private information for which

Presentation Embed Code

Download Presentation

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DIS..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this website for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff,: Transcript


2 10 28 Case No A PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential proprietary or private information for which special protection from publ. a California corporation Plaintiff v TRINITAS LLC a Texas limited liability company DAVID OAKS an individual Defendants Case No CV 1206736 DDP SHx ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMA California Law Update. Christine Reed, Partner, Monterey Office. Kurt Bridgman, Partner, San Francisco Office. Chavez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th . 632. Facts. :.  . Plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury when the back panel of a “Free Motion” cable cross-over machine came loose and struck her head at a 24 Hour Fitness facility. When plaintiff joined the 24 Hour Fitness facility, she signed a Membership Agreement that included a release of liability. Under the release provision, plaintiff agreed that 24 Hour Fitness would not be liable for any injury she suffered as a result of 24 Hour’s negligence. Plaintiff and her husband sued 24 Hour Fitness for ordinary and gross negligence, premises liability and strict products liability. 24 Hour Fitness moved for summary judgment, arguing that the release in the Membership Agreement barred plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. . Christine Reed, Partner, Monterey Office. Kurt Bridgman, Partner, San Francisco Office. Chavez v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th . 632. Facts. :.  . Plaintiff suffered a traumatic brain injury when the back panel of a “Free Motion” cable cross-over machine came loose and struck her head at a 24 Hour Fitness facility. When plaintiff joined the 24 Hour Fitness facility, she signed a Membership Agreement that included a release of liability. Under the release provision, plaintiff agreed that 24 Hour Fitness would not be liable for any injury she suffered as a result of 24 Hour’s negligence. Plaintiff and her husband sued 24 Hour Fitness for ordinary and gross negligence, premises liability and strict products liability. 24 Hour Fitness moved for summary judgment, arguing that the release in the Membership Agreement barred plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and premises liability. The trial court granted summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. . OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. M & T MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendan UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Civil Action 03-1406 (GK/JMF) MEMOR Plaintiff This complaint is part of ClassAction.org's searchable class action lawsuit database and can be found in this post: Riviera Loft Hotel Hit with Unpaid Wage Lawsuit 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU For the First Circuit No. 19 - 1505 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Appell ee , v. LINCOLN GABRIEL PUPO , Defendant, Appell ant . APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RI signed In addition at a state court hearing challenging the search in Nalis criminal proceedingWayne County Michigan circuit judge Judge Kym L Worthy stated on the record the magistratewas wrong in s K---------------------------------------------BOLIVAR JUCA -against- ---------------------------------------------XX 21-cv-2855 VSB ORDER VERNON S BRODERICK United States District Judge I am in re No 14--212 RJSNOEL BIDO Plaintiff -v- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DefendantNo 19-8388 RJSORDERRICHARD J SULLIVANCircuit Judge Before the Court Defendant Noel Bidos pro semotionforcompassionate re USCA11 Case 20-13957 Date Filed 05/17/2021 Page 1 of 4x0000x00002 x/MCIxD 0 x/MCIxD 0 Juan Alejandro Rodriguez Cuya a federal prisoner appeals pro sethe denial of hismotion for compassionate MARTINEZ CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT 39HEARING DATE 05/13/21-1-1 TIME 900 CASE MSC19-01377CASE NAME DUHE VS HOSPITAL COURIERSHEARING ON MOTION TO/FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASSSETTLEMENT FILED BY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITArgued May 15 2020Decided January 19 2021No 19-5362AHMED ALI MUTHANAINDIVIDUALLYAND AS NEXT FRIEND OF HODA MUTHANA AND MINOR JOHN DOEAPPELLANTvMICHAEL RPOMPEOIN HIS 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728Northern District of CaliforniaUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAPANGEA LEGAL SERVICES et alPlaintiffsvUS DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 1DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUTH Jonathan Frank andFrank Family TrustPlaintiffsCivil No 303cv1014JBAvArthur LoVetere et alDefendantsRULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISSDOCS 40 41 42 49 68On November 7 20

Download Document

Here is the link to download the presentation.
"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff,"The content belongs to its owner. You may download and print it for personal use, without modification, and keep all copyright notices. By downloading, you agree to these terms.

Related Documents