/
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi

INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi - PowerPoint Presentation

classyshadow
classyshadow . @classyshadow
Follow
342 views
Uploaded On 2020-07-04

INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi - PPT Presentation

All rights reserved No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the author To the Instructor The set of files here are designed to help you prepare lectures for your own course using the text ID: 795243

density log porosity resistivity log density resistivity porosity gamma shale logs formation neutron response ray gas field rock high

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download The PPT/PDF document "INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

INSTRUCTOR

© 2017, John R. Fanchi

All rights reserved. No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the author.

Slide2

To the Instructor

The set of files here are designed to help you prepare lectures for your own course using the text

Introduction to Petroleum Engineering

, J.R. Fanchi and R.L. Christiansen (Wiley, 2017)

File format is kept simple so that you can customize the files with relative ease using your own style. You will need to supplement the files to complete the presentation topics.

Slide3

WELL LOGGING

© 2017, John R. Fanchi

All rights reserved. No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the author.

Slide4

Outline

Well Logging

Subsurface Ionic Environment

Lithology Logs

Porosity Logs

Resistivity Logs

Induction Logs Log Calibration with Formation Samples Modern Log Applications

Homework: IPE Ch. 9

Slide5

WELL LOGGING

Slide6

Well Logging Objectives

Estimate near-wellbore formation properties

Depth

Thickness (net and gross)

Porosity

Formation density

Acoustic velocity

Temperature and pressureLithology (rock type)Fluid saturationsIndication of hydrocarbonsIndicate permeability (e.g. high, low, tight)Structural trends (e.g. formation dip)Fracture properties

Slide7

Typical Applications of Well Logs

Quality of wellbore

Size of wellbore (caliper log)

Integrity of cement bond (cement bond log)

Provide information for

Geologic mapping

Prospect evaluation (where to drill)

Reserve estimatesIndicate presence of hydrocarbonsMeasure Sw; infer hydrocarbonsFluid contacts, e.g. GOC, WOCIndicate which zones to complete (perforate)

Slide8

Well Log Header and Tracks

Depth Track

Track

1

Track

2

Track

3

Header

Header

Track

1

Track

2

Scale

Scale

Scale

Scale

Scale

Slide9

Well Log Schematic

Well Data

Logging Data

Depth Track

Track

1

Track

2

SP

Res

Slide10

Types of Well Logs

Lithology logs

Spontaneous Potential (SP)

Now tends to be replace by Gamma Ray

Gamma Ray (GR)

Photoelectric Effect (PEF)

Porosity logs

DensityNeutronAcoustic (Sonic)Resistivity logsInductionLaterologMicro Resistivity

Specialty Logs

e.g. FMI (Formation Micro Image)

Slide11

Computer Generated Logs

Computer performs corrections and calculations

Graphical view

Easy to see analysis

Estimate lithology, saturations, porosity, etc.

Slide12

SUBSURFACE IONIC ENVIRONMENT

Slide13

Ohm’s Law

Ohm’s Law:

V = IR

where

V = voltage (volts)

I = current (amps)

R = resistance (ohms)

Conductance = 1/R (Siemens)1 Siemens = 1 mho = 1/ohmElectrical current is charge in motion, e.g. Na+

cation

and

Cl

-

anion.

Slide14

Alternative form of Ohm’s Law

Alternative form of Ohm’s Law:

E =

ρ

J

where

E = electric field (volt/m)

J = current density (amp/m2)ρ = resistivity (ohm-m)

L

A

+

Carrier of positive charge moves in direction of E, I, J

Carrier of negative charge (e

-

) moves in opposite direction

Slide15

Resistivity and Resistance

Alternative form of Ohm’s Law:

E =

ρ

J

where

E = electric field (volt/m)

J = current density (amp/m2)ρ = resistivity (ohm-m)Resistivity is related to resistance.For uniform conductor with length L and area A:R =

ρ

L / A

Resistivity

ρ

is the inverse of conductivity

σ

:

ρ = 1 / σLA+−

Slide16

Fluids that Affect Logging Measurements

Drilling mud (resistivity R

m

)

Mud filtrate(resistivity

R

mf

)Formation water(resistivity Rw)Hydrocarbons (assumed infinite resistivity)

Resistivity depends on formation temperature

Slide17

Invasion Zones for Drilling Fluids

Adjacent Bed

Borehole

Adjacent Bed

Uninvaded

Zone

Zone of Transition

Flushed

Zone

Mud

Cake

Uninvaded

Zone

Slide18

LITHOLOGY LOGS

Slide19

Common Reservoir Rock Types and an Illustrative Stratigraphic Column

Slide20

Gamma Ray Log

or Natural Gamma Ray Log

Gamma rays (GR) from NORM

Measure in API units

Relative unit

NORM

Potassium

GR energy 1.46

MeV

Thorium series

GR energy 2.62

MeV

Uranium-Radium series

GR energy 1.76

MeV

Slide21

Light-Matter Interaction

Photoelectric Effect

Low-energy phenomenon

Photoelectric effect

Mid-energy phenomena

Thomson scattering (elastic)

Compton scattering (inelastic)

High-energy phenomenon Pair production

Compton Scattering

Photon wavelength changes

Space

Time

Slide22

Gamma Ray Log Response

Slide23

NORM in West Texas

Barnett Shale

Mississippian Barnett Shale above MD = 9606

ft

Mississippian Limestone below MD = 9606

ft

SGR – Spectral Gamma Ray

CGR – Total GR minus URAN

POTA – Potassium 40,

wt

%

URAN – Uranium, ppm

THOR – Thorium, ppm

Barnett Shale

Limestone

Source: Asquith and Krygowski, Fig. 3.3, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd Ed (2004)

Slide24

Lithology Log: Gamma Ray

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Gamma Ray

Rock Type

Detects shale from in situ radioactivity.

High GR

shales

Low GR

clean sands and carbonates

In most cases, shale formations are most radioactive

Most reservoir rocks exhibit low radioactivity

GR log is shale indicator

Slide25

SP (Spontaneous Potential)

SP = Potential difference (voltage) between 2 fluids with different salinities

SP electrode

Grounded on surface

Connected to logging tool

SP affected by shale content

Can calculate formation water resistivity RW from SP

Need R

W

to calculate saturation

Slide26

SP (aka Self Potential) Log

Measures potential difference between drilling fluids and formation waters

Distinguish permeable beds from shale

Small SP response

impermeable shale

Large SP response

 permeable bedsSP log hard to interpret when formation waters are fresh (not salty)

Slide27

Lithology Log: Spontaneous Potential

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Spontaneous Potential

Permeable Beds

Measures electrical potential (voltage) associated with movement of ions.

Low response

impermeable shale

Large response

permeable beds

Slide28

Lithology Log: Photoelectric Effect

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Photoelectric Effect

Rock Type

Measure absorption of low energy gamma rays by atoms in formation.

High GR

shales

Low GR

clean sands and carbonates (absorb GR)

Photoelectric effect log is

shale indicator

Photoelectric Effect

Slide29

POROSITY LOGS

Formation Density

Neutron Porosity

Sonic

Slide30

Density Log

Gives rock density reading in gm/cc

Water = 1 gm/cc (62.4 lb/cu ft or 8.33

ppg

)

Sandstone ~ 2.65 gm/cc

Limestone ~ 2.71 gm/cc

Salt ~ 1.6 – 2.0 gm/ccCalculate porosity % from log reading and rock type

Slide31

Estimate Porosity from Density given Lithology

Slide32

Porosity Log: Density

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Density

Porosity*

Measures electron density by detecting Compton scattered gamma rays. Electron density is related to formation density. Good for detecting hydrocarbon gas with low density compared to rock or liquid.

Low response

low HC gas content

Large response

high HC gas content

* The combination of density log and neutron log provides the most reliable porosity estimate and can be used to indicate gas.

Shale reduces apparent porosity measured by density log

Gas increases apparent porosity measured by density log

Slide33

Porosity Log: Neutron

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Neutron

Hydrogen Content

Fast neutrons are slowed by collisions to thermal energies. Thermal neutrons are captured by nuclei, which then emit detectable gamma rays. Note: hydrogen has a large capture cross-section for thermal neutrons. Good for detecting gas.

Large response

high H content

Small response

low H content

Shale appears as high apparent porosity measured by neutron log

Dry gas appears as low apparent porosity measured by neutron log

Slide34

Neutron – Density Crossplot

Neutron – Density

crossplot

plot porosity from neutron log

vs

porosity from density log

Clean sand line

density = neutron

1.0

1.0

0.0

0.0

density

neutronGas sand density > neutronShaly sand 

density < neutron

Slide35

Neutron Log – Density Log Comparisons

Gas indicator

Crossplot

can identify gas-bearing sands in sand-shale sequences

Lithology indicator

Apparent limestone porosity will appear high in density log if limestone contains anhydrite

Slide36

Gas Effect

Density-Neutron Crossover

How do logs respond when gas is present?

Density log reads porosity correctly

Neutron log treats gas as rock so it reads low porosity

Therefore curves separate when gas is present

Gas probably present when density log and neutron log separate

Slide37

Typical Sonic Log Velocities

Velocity (ft/sec)

t

(second/ft)

Shale

7,000 – 17,000

144 – 59

Sandstone

11,500

– 16,000

87 – 62

Limestone

13,000 – 18,500

77 – 54

Dolomite

15,000 – 20,000

67 – 50

Natural

Gas

1,500

667

Water

5,000

200

Slide38

Porosity Log: Sonic

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Acoustic (sonic)

Porosity

Measures speed of sound in medium. Speed of sound faster in rock than in fluid.

Long travel time

slow speed

large pore space

Short travel time

high speed 

small pore space

Porous rock slows down sound waves

Porosities calculated from sonic log measurements are generally high in hydrocarbon-bearing unconsolidated sands

Slide39

RESISTIVITY LOGS

Slide40

Gamma Ray and Resistivity Logs

Resistivity Log

Gamma Ray Log

Long

Short

Slide41

INDUCTION LOGS

Slide42

What is induction logging?

Based on Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction

Oscillating magnetic field induces electric field

Transmitter coil in tool creates primary magnetic field

Primary magnetic field induces toroidal electric field Toroid = doughnut shape

Slide43

What is induction logging?

(cont.)

Toroidal

electric field creates electrical “eddy current”

Eddy current is induced in conductor by changing magnetic field

Strength of eddy currents depends on conductivity

Eddy currents create secondary magnetic field

Measure secondary magnetic field with receiver coil

Slide44

What is induction logging?

(cont.)

Secondary magnetic field

Eddy current in conductor

(e.g. ionic environment)

Primary magnetic field

Transmitter coil

Receiver coil

Slide45

SI Unit of Conductivity

Conductivity is inverse of resistivity

Conductivity unit is

siemens

/meter (S/m) or

millisiemens

/meter (mS/m) where 1 Siemen = 1 mho = 1/ohm Common conductivity unit is micromho/cm

1

micromho

/cm = 1

μS

/cm.

Convert to logged units using 10

μS

/cm = 1 mS/m Example suppose resistivity is 10 ohm-m conductivity = 1/(10 ohm-m) = 0.1 mho/m = 0.1 S/m

Slide46

Electrode Log or Dual Laterolog

LOG

VARIABLE

RESPONSE

Electrode or Dual

Laterolog

Fluid Type

Measures resistivity of formation water.

High resistivity

hydrocarbons

Low resistivity

brine

Slide47

Resistivity Logs and Borehole Fluids

Log

Need Conductive Borehole Fluid?

Comment(s)

Induction

No

Work with oil-based mud and air-filled boreholes.

Unreliable in boreholes filled with very conductive mud.

Dual laterolog*

Yes

Will not work with oil-based mud and air-filled boreholes

*

Laterolog

tools use electrodes to measure formation resistivity (shallow and deep) through saline borehole fluids

Slide48

Dual Laterolog

Curves

Distinguish between

Water-Bearing Zone and Hydrocarbon-Bearing Zone

Source: Asquith and

Krygowski

, Figs. 1.7 & 1.9, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2

nd Ed (2004)

Log

Measures

GR

Gamma Ray

CALI

Caliper

LLD

Deep

Laterolog

True formation resistivity (

R

t)

LLS

Shallow LaterologResistivity of invaded zone (Ri)RXOMicroresistivityResistivity of flushed zoneMSFLMicrospherically focusedResistivity of flushed zone

Slide49

Activity

Well Log Responses – 1

Place the correct answer in the left hand column.

 

Log

 

Response

 

Gamma Ray

1

Measures electrical potential (voltage) associated with movement of ions.

 

Density

2

Detects shale from in situ radioactivity.

 

Photoelectric Effect

3

Measures speed of sound in medium. Speed of sound faster in rock than in fluid.

 

Electrode (dual laterolog)

4

Fast neutrons are slowed by collisions to thermal energies. Thermal neutrons are captured by nuclei, which then emit detectable gamma rays.

 

Acoustic (sonic)

5

Measures resistivity of formation water.

 

SP

6

Measure absorption of low energy gamma rays by atoms in formation.

 

Neutron

7

Measures electron density by detecting Compton scattered gamma rays.

 

 

8

None of the above

Slide50

Activity

Well Log Responses – 2

Place the correct answer in the left hand column. There may be some duplication.

 

Log

 

Identifies

 

Neutron

1

Porosity

 

SP

2

Fluid Type

 

Density

3

Rock Type

 

Photoelectric Effect

4

Hydrogen content

 

Acoustic (sonic)

5

Permeable beds

 

Electrode (dual laterolog)

6

None of the Above

 

Gamma Ray

 

 

Slide51

LOG CALIBRATION WITH FORMATION SAMPLES

Slide52

Mud Log

ROP

Rate of Penetration

Gamma rays (GR) from NORM

Measure in API units

Relative unit

Potassium

GR energy 1.46

MeV

Thorium series

GR energy 2.62

MeV

Uranium-Radium series

GR energy 1.76

MeV

Slide53

NORM in West Texas

Barnett Shale

Mississippian Barnett Shale above MD = 9606

ft

Mississippian Limestone below MD = 9606

ft

SGR – Spectral Gamma Ray

CGR – Total GR minus URAN

POTA – Potassium 40,

wt

%

URAN – Uranium, ppm

THOR – Thorium, ppm

Barnett Shale

Limestone

Source: Asquith and Krygowski, Fig. 3.3, Basic Well Log Analysis, 2nd Ed (2004)

Slide54

Evaluate Well Cuttings

Well Site Geologist

Examines Well Cuttings

Makes note of cores

Full-Diameter Cores

Side Cores

Slide55

MODERN LOG APPLICATIONS

Slide56

Principal Applications of Common Well Logs

(after

Selley

and

Sonnenberg

[2015, page 86])

Log Type

Lithology

Hydrocarbons

Porosity

Pressure

Dip

ELECTRIC

 

 

 

 

 

SP

X

 

   

Resistivity

X

X

 

X

 

RADIO­ACTIVE

 

 

 

 

 

Gamma Ray

X

 

 

 

 

Neutron

 

X

X

 

 

Density

 

X

X

 

 

SONIC

X

X

X

X

 

DIPMETER

 

 

 

 

X

Slide57

Illustration of a Fence Diagram

(A) A clean sand interval indicated by gamma ray (GR) logs.

(B) Fence diagram displaying clean sand correlation.

Slide58

Interpret Depositional Environment Using Well Logs

S.P.

Resistivity

Well

Shale

Sandstone

Interbedded

SS &

Shales

Shale

S.P.

Resistivity

Well

Shale

Sandstone

Shale

for beach or barrier island marine SS

for fluvial SS

*Fig. 158, P.K. Link,

Basic Petroleum Geology

, 3

rd Edition (2001), Tulsa: OGCITypical electrical log shapes…

Slide59

QUESTIONS?

Slide60

SUPPLEMENT