PPT-An exploratory analysis of rail travel time and fare diffe

publicly available datasets The Institute For Transport Studies The University of Leeds Dr Andrew Mark Tomlinson 23 rd April 2015 Class 87 at Crewe April 1977 3 x Class 86s at Preston April 1977. Implications for Practice. kai.petersen@bth.se. Exploratory. testing. Definition. How it is . used in industry. How it performs in . comparison . with . scripted testing. Implications . for practice. EcoPass. Recommendation. Operations & Customer Service Committee. September 8, 2015. Fare Study Process. Summer 2014: Fare Study Initiated. First phase was focused on fare structure. Pricing was incorporated as part of the recommendations for public hearings. Michael P. . Onder. Team Leader, Freight Operations and Technology. US Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Freight . Management and Operations. May 11, . 2010. Contents. & Technology. Unit 8: Improving Transit Quality . Motivation: Why do we care about fares? . The fare system impacts many aspects of the transit system, including…. Planning: . fare technology provides data about ridership. LT1784 1 Operates with Inputs Above V+ Rail-to-Rail Input and Output Gain Bandwidth Product: 2.5MHz Slew Rate: 2.1V/ Remark: covers Chapter 3 of the Tan book in Part. Organization. Why Exloratory Data Analysis?. Summary Statistics. Visualization. 1. Why Data Exploration?. Key motivations of data exploration include. Jim Trentadue. Software Quality Consulting Director. Original Software. jtrentadue@origsoft.com. Agenda. 2. What drives ET. 3. Good automation practice with ET . 4. 5. Case Study. Enabling Test Automation for ET . Hillary Foose. Director, Communication & Marketing. Background. Fall 2011 – Conducted public outreach for $.25 increase to base fares. Early 2012 – Initiated Title . VI . analysis; tabled fare increase discussion . 8,800 bus stops. 137 commuter rail stations. 1,050 . signals. 895 switches. 80 . Interlockings. 846 . miles of . track. 740 bus route . miles. 10 bus yards and shops. 7 subway facilities. 3 commuter rail facilities. The Rapid . e. – Fare System . A new way for passengers to pay their fares. The best fare system for EVERY rider. A tool to speed boarding at bus stops. A way to eliminate the printing of 1.7 million transfers each year. Simplify. RTD’s fare policy in an . equitable . and . cost-effective. . manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers moving forward. Goals:. Simplicity (ease of use). Acceptability/Marketability (implementable). 2017. Presentation Contents. Existing Fare Structure. Fare Model. Fare Structure Opportunities and Alternatives. 2. 1.. 2.. 3.. EXISTING FARE STRUCTURE. GMT Fare Structure. 4. Chittenden County. Franklin/Grand Isle. The Fare Study Objective: Simplify RTD’s fare policy in an equitable and cost-effective manner to better serve the needs of the District and its customers moving forward Goals: Simplicity (ease of use) [Course Instructor]. [Course Semester]. [Course Number]. Materials developed. by C. Brakewood, K. Watkins, and J. . LaMondia. .. Outline . Motivation: Why should we care about fares?. Key “parameters” of a transit fare system:.