Combining Money Management, Portfolio Metrics, and Strategies for Investing and Trading - PowerPoint Presentation

Slide1

Combining Money Management, Portfolio Metrics, and Strategies for Investing and Trading

Discussed by:Paul Grems DuncanLeader, Tri-State Investors GroupJuly 16, 2001

1Slide2

Today’s Topics

Metrics – a few that will help your trading/investingThree strategies that appear to be working right nowEffective Volume Overview and a review of some candidate stocks2Slide3

Admin

Example files are located in my forum at http://forums.effectivevolume.comDirections on how to access these files are at the end of the presentation.

3Slide4

Portfolio Metrics: Do We Care?

Yes!Portfolio Metrics help us understand whether the changes we make to a portfolio are beneficial.To use metrics though, you have to keep some form of log… (which I will provide an example… )

4Slide5

My Favorite Portfolio Metrics

Calmar RatioMathematical ExpectationPessimistic Return RatioThere are others (Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Upside Potential Ratio, etc.) but they are more difficult to understand and apply consistently (in my opinion).

5Slide6

The Concept of Drawdown

What is Drawdown (DD)?Drawdown is the measurement from the maximum (equity, price) peak to the lowest value AFTER the peak.Perceived Drawdown is: the mechanism that causes us to sell a stock in a decline, resulting in us locking in losses rather than having confidence in our mechanical systems. the enemy of mechanical trading.

There IS a distinction between

intra-trade

DD and

end-of-trade

DD –

end-of-trade

is far more important!

6Slide7

Drawdown Example:Daily Russell 2K Since 1987

7Slide8

Calmar Ratio

What is the Calmar Ratio? CR is a very simple metric that relates return to drawdown. Easy to remember

:

If CR < 0, your CAR is negative, and you’re losing money. This is a bad system.

If CR ~ 1, Reward to Risk is 1:1. In general, you lose a dollar for every dollar gained, but

time frame

is important

.

If CR = 2, for every dollar lost, you gain 2 dollars. Good system.

If CR = 3, for every dollar lost, you gain 3 dollars. Great system!

Practical, winning systems generally have a CR > 1.50

 Slide9

Example of CR = 0.82(CRR = 30.5%, MDD = 37.4%), 12/2/08 to 12/2/09

9

AAII Accelerated EPS Strategy (Modified Shadow Stock Portfolio Criteria)Slide10

Example of CR = 5.07(CRR = 41.6%, MDD = 8.20%), 5/4/09 to 5/4/10

10AAII Accelerated EPS Strategy (Modified Shadow Stock Portfolio Criteria)Slide11

Steps to Track Calmar Ratio

1) You need your equity curve, either real or backtested.2) Download CR-CalculationExample.xls at my forum at Effective Volume (once you’ve registered, of course).

11Slide12

CR Moves with Time!

(Thankfully, Not Fast)

12

1996 – 2010,

AAII Accelerated EPS Strategy (Modified Shadow Stock Portfolio Criteria)

Average = 2.02

+/-

1.31

Stdev

Ugliness

Ugliness

Ugliness

We’ll discuss how to use CR and timers to improve a strategy later in the presentationSlide13

Criticisms of CR

The definition uses the compounded annual return (CAR); this isn’t practical for short bursts of trades as the time frames do not align. Trades occurring in a 4-week burst do not extrapolate to 12 months very well.Correspondingly, many people simply use total return (if less than 1 year) and the actual MDD. The purists will shutter, but this latter method works until a solid history per strategy is developed.

13Slide14

Mathematical Expectation

What is Mathematical Expectation (ME)?ME is the “average take-home” amount in a trade scaled by the % of winning trades for the strategy (you have a strategy, right?)All you need is:Average winning trade amountAverage losing trade amount% winning trades for the strategyIn the long haul, ME MUST BE > 0.Slide15

ME Example

A strategy has demonstrated a record of only 20% winning trades.The average profit per trade is $10KThe average loss per trade is $2KIs this a winning strategy?

Where: AW = average winning trade amount

AL = average losing trade amount

PW is the % winning trades

15Slide16

ME Example (con’t)

In the long run, this example should be profitable, as the ME is shown to be > 0.

16Slide17

Steps to Track ME

1) You need to start tracking your trades with a log.2) You need to track what strategy is being used for a specific trade (you DO have (a) strategy(ies), right?)3) Download “ME-PRR-CalculationExample.xls” from my forum at Effective Volume – this is a log that auto-calculates ME.

17Slide18

Example Trade Log for Autocalculating

ME18

Enter Trades

by

Strategy

Worksheet Auto-

calc’s

Various

Parameters

ME-PRR-CalculationExample.xlsSlide19

Pessimistic Return Ratio (PRR)

Pessimistic WHAT?Created by Ralph Vince and published in “Portfolio Management Formulas” (ISBN 0-471-52756-4), this is a REALLY good method to understand your profitability and whether your methods will work in the longer haul.PRR is like ME but it gets better as the number of trades increases. Slide20

Pessimistic Return Ratio

Here’s how PRR is defined:

W is the number of winning trades

L is the number of losing trades

AW is the average winning trade amount

AL is the average losing trade amount

Per Vince: PRR > 2.0 are good systems. PRR > 2.5 are excellent systems.

Also per Vince: We need at least 24-28 trades in a system to know whether it’s a viable system

20Slide21

PRR Example

Suppose we have a system with 13 winning trades, 5 losing trades, with $288 taken home on each trade that is won, and with ($33) lost on each trade that goes against our methods.

21Slide22

Steps to Track PRR

1) Download “ME-PRR-CalculationExample.xls” from my forum at Effective Volume – this is a log that auto-calculates PRR (yes, this is the same file that also calculates ME).22Slide23

Review of Metrics

Calmar Ratio: Compares gain to drawdown. Tells you if you’re taking too much risk (DD > gain is bad)Mathematical Expectation: The “edge” of a strategy – we want positive numbers only here.Pessimistic Return Ratio: the best of the three, it tells us how good a strategy is, and it improves as the number of trades goes up

23Slide24

Strategies

24Slide25

AAII Shadow Stock Portfolio

Standard AAII portfolio: http://www.aaii.com/model-portfolios/stock-rulesFocuses on Small Cap stocks between $17 and $200M in sizePerformance over last year has been quite good, but historically?Slide26

AAII MSSP Performance

Actual vs. Modeled, 1997-2010, corr = 0.816

26

Avg

CR = 3.49 +/-

5.14

MDD = ~49%Slide27

AAII MSSP Performance

The assumption here is that the modeled performance is “adequate” at corr = 0.816 (1.0 = perfect, 0.0 = no correlation)The drawdown of 49% would most likely have caused most to bail long before this occurred, then losing out to subsequent gains in 2009 and 2010.The average CR of 3.50 is very, very good, but, the standard deviation of +/- 5.14 suggests major losses (3.5 – 5.1

 CR < 0 –

BIG PROBLEM

)

How to stabilize CR by reducing MDD?

27Slide28

Improving AAII MSSP Performance

28

“Market Cap Favoritism” – There are certain periods in the cycle that Small Caps underperform

Chart is the RATIO of Russell 1000 (Large Caps) to Russell 2000 (Small Caps) – R2K is in the Denominator

Favor Small Caps

1/03 – 9/08

Favor Small Caps 6/08 – 9/08

4/09 - Present

Favor Large Caps

6/06 – 5/08

10/08 – 3/09Slide29

AAII MSSP Performance

Gated w/ Russell 1K/2K Favoritism29

Avg

CR = 4.59 +/-

5.76

MDD = ~28%Slide30

Stockcharts can Assist in Analysis

30

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=IWB:IWM&p=D&yr=3&mn=0&dy=0&id=p46574665355

Green = Small Cap

Favoritism

Ratio is below trend – Small caps are looking better, so watch for itSlide31

AAII MSSP Conclusions

It’s possible to use CR (as well as other metrics) to quantify adjustments to a strategy.The AAII MSSP strategy is a good strategy, but management of the drawdown must occur or we’ll lose confidence in the system.The general trend of favoring large caps or small caps certainly helps to provide confidence that we’re not running with small caps when the large caps are dominating.Right now it appears that small caps are just coming into favor again

31Slide32

Mean Reversion Strategies

What is Mean Reversion?Mean reversion is when a stock or ETF gets overbought or oversold to the extent that after some period of time, buyers/sellers converge and move the price to the mean.Markets generally are in a trend or are mean-reverting. It’s important to have tools for each market.Larry Connors and Cesar Alvarez have developed a number of strategies to take advantage of this phenomenonSlide33

A Comment on Mean Reversion Strategies

The psychology of mean reversion is opposite to that of trend trading. In trend trading, you add to your position as it increases.In mean-reversion trading, you add to your position as it fallsIf you are not prepared to see negative numbers, then in trendless markets, you may be better suited to sit on the sidelines.

33Slide34

Favorite Connors’ Mean Reversion Strategy

Connors calls it “TPS” for Time-Price-Scale InThis is an aggressive strategyFocused on ETFsYou “scale-in” to a position as the price drops on the long side in a 10%-20%-30%-40% fashion (which equals a 100% position when all done)Connors’ has conducted much of his work using 20, non-leveraged, highly-liquid ETFsWhat are the specific rules of this strategy?

34Slide35

Connors’ TPS Strategy (Long)

1) ETF is above the 200d MA2) RSI(2) is below 25 for two days in a row. Buy 10% at the close.3) If prices are lower on the close than your previous entry, buy 20% at the close4) Repeat #3 until you attain 40%Exit on the close when the 2-period RSI closes above 70A PDF copy of Connor’s book has been uploaded into the Effective Volume forum; there are more details there.

How has the strategy performed?

35Slide36

Connors’ TPS Strategy (Long)

20 ETF Inception to 12/31/081159 TradesAverage % P/L = 1.45%Average Holding Time = 6d% Number Winners = 89%

20 ETF from 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

405 Trades

Average % P/L =

1.67%

Average Holding Time =

5d

% Number Winners =

93%

ME: 0.203

36Slide37

Connor’s TPS Strategy (Long)Equity Curve, 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

37Slide38

Connor’s TPS Strategy (Long)

Trade Distribution, 1/1/09 to 7/15/1138

Note that there are a few trades that fell -14%Slide39

Connors’ TPS Strategy (Short)

20 ETF Inception to 12/31/08648 TradesAverage % P/L = 1.97%Average Holding Time = 6d% Number Winners = 81%

20 ETF from 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

59 Trades

Average % P/L =

1.39%

Average Holding Time =

6d

% Number Winners =

75%

ME: 0.163

39Slide40

Connor’s TPS Strategy (Short)Equity Curve, 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

40Slide41

Connor’s TPS Strategy (Short)

Trade Distribution, 1/1/09 to 7/15/1141

Note that there are a few trades that fell -12%Slide42

Optimizing Connor’s TPS Strategy

One criticism that I have of this strategy is that it can tie up capital. On the bottom of the previous equity graphs there is a graph to the Number of Open Positions. For the non-leveraged ETFs, this could be close to all 20 positions.What about using leveraged ETFs, and simply reduce the position size?This next test uses the Direxion +/- 3x Leveraged ETFs

42Slide43

Connors’ TPS Strategy (3x Long)

1x 20 Long ETF 1/1/09 to 7/15/11405 TradesAverage % P/L = 1.67%Average Holding Time = 5d% Number Winners = 93%ME: 0.203

3x ETF from 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

163 Trades

Average % P/L =

4.33%

Average Holding Time =

5d

% Number Winners =

89%

ME: 0.492

43Slide44

Connor’s TPS Strategy (3x Long)

Trade Distribution, 1/1/09 to 7/15/1144

Note that there is 1 trade that fell >60%Slide45

Connors’ TPS Strategy (-3x Short)

1x 20 Short ETF 1/1/09 to 7/15/1159 TradesAverage % P/L = 1.39%Average Holding Time = 6d% Number Winners = 75%ME: 0.163

-3x ETF from 1/1/09 to 7/15/11

70 Trades

Average % P/L =

1.53%

Average Holding Time =

8d

% Number Winners =

74%

ME: 0.091

45Slide46

Connor’s TPS Strategy (-3x Short)

Trade Distribution, 1/1/09 to 7/15/1146

Note that there is 1 trade that fell >30%Slide47

Connors’ TPS Strategy Conclusions

TPS has a positive ME in all 4 cases (non-leveraged, leveraged, long, short).The greatest “edge” (ME) is going long with the +3x Leveraged Direxion ETFs, followed by going long with the +1x original ETFs that Connor tested.The greatest net gain per trade is long with the +3x Leveraged ETFs ( +4.33%/trade), followed by long the +1x original ETFs (+1.67%/trade)

47Slide48

The IWM and GDX Robots

Pascal Willain and Billy O’Nair have created two very focused, mechanical trading systems that are available at the Effective Volume web site which are profitable.The first system, which uses IWM and related ETFs, is based upon the 20d Money Flow, established using Pascal’s Effective Volume tools, as well as precise entries/exits using pivot levels, statistics, and risk/reward ratios. This is a combination mean-reversion and trend-following system.

The second system, which uses GDX, is based upon money flow, looking specifically for extremes, then fades these situations. This is a mean reversion system.

These two instruments were chosen because they are not highly correlated.

Detailed FAQs can be found on the Effective Volume site, under the heading “Robots”. You must be a registered member to view.

48Slide49

Theoretical Equity Curve for IWM Robot

49Slide50

Theoretical Equity Curve for GDX Robot

50Slide51

Paul’s IWM Robot Performance

Just started getting really serious with the IWM Robot.15 total trades, 10 long, 5 short.

ME: 4.58

PRR: 1.08 (but only have 15 trades)

51Slide52

Summary of Strategies

The AAII MSSP strategy is a good strategy which can be improved upon by incorporating a larger signal which kicks you out when small caps are out of favor.When trend-following does not work, mean-reversion via Connor strategies can keep some income moving in.Pascal’s and Billy’s robots are proving their worth, and a forward test of the IWM robot is very profitable.

52Slide53

Effective Volume – aka “Follow the Whales”

Effective Volume, developed by Pascal Willain, separates minute-by-minute volume and price movements, resulting in assigning volume movement to two groups:Large Effective Volume (LEV): volume attributed to institutionals and other big players. Occurs because once the bid/ask is satisfied, the price must move up if the bid is unsatisfied, else the price must drop if the ask is unsatisfied

Small Effective Volume (

SmEV

): volume attributed to retail buying and selling of an equity. Typically, small selling does not move the price a significant amount over extended periods of time.

EV money flow, which is determined by buying/selling of institutional investors by averaging individual money flow within ~92 industry groups, can tell us what the markets are doing overall and whether we should be long, cash, or short.Slide54

How I (Paul) Use EV

Let’s say that I have a stock candidate. Since 30% of the price movement is historically related to institutional buying, I check the EV site to see if 1) the industry group/sector that the stock belongs to has accumulation across many stocks in the group. Institutionals typically buy multiple stocks in a hot sector2) if the stock is showing a positive divergence in large effective volume compared to small EV.There is a movie posted EV site

that I created and which shows how I navigate the different information.

GGT (Paul’s system) and EV work together nicely to identify early breakouts; here’s an example:

54Slide55

GGT + EV Stocks

These are favorable EV stocks for Monday (VNR, CL, MDVN, DVN, and CDE). Two are showing EV buying: CL and CDE. VNR just turned into a GGT New Long, which is favorable. Let’s look at the first 3:55Slide56

VNR

56

Notice how Total

EV is converging on

trendline

… stock is being accumulated

Group just issued a “buy” signal because large player

strength has jumped above 0%Slide57

CL

57

Upward trending average line shows constant accumulation

Group recently signaled a “buy” but has dropped back below 0 and the trend line. CL is a “wait”Slide58

MDVN

58

Weaker TEV trend line but the fact that TEV has crossed above is very positive

Group recently signaled a “buy” and

trendline

is just crossing 0 from below – very bullish for group.Slide59

The Day’s Summary

We covered three relevant metrics to assist you with your portfolio:CR, ME, and PRRWe looked at the AAII MSSP performance, and then suggested a method to improve drawdown which will help CR in the long run. The method is not related to the strategy at all (What was it? Hint: Russell 1K vs. Russell 2K)We looked at Connor’s TPS Mean Reversion Strategy and found a strategy that slowly, but with a positive edge, generates profits. We concluded that the 3x leveraged ETFs have a better edge and better gain than their 1x counterparts.

We looked at two mechanical strategies that have phenomenal

backtesting

performance and the initial forward test is going very well.

We looked briefly at how I evaluate GGT + EV stocks, specifically using the EV web site after I have candidates.

There are files to download at the Effective Volume site. You must register to view these files; directions follow on the remaining slides.

59Slide60

From Pascal Willian

, Creator of Effective Volume:If you are interested in becoming a member at the Effective Volume site and accessing the EV data, there is a special offer for AAII participants:Go to http://

www.effectivevolume.eu/EV_Subscribe_Special.html

and if you mention that you’re an AAII member and attended this presentation, you’ll get $10 off the yearly subscription of $149 (most of which goes to charity – see the web page). This will give you daily access to EV data on over 1000 stocks and 200 ETFs. It is an eye opening experience to your investing/trading.

Further, if you’re interested in the IWM and GDX robots, let me (Paul) know, and I’ll see what I can do for a free trial.

60Slide61

Registering for Access to Presentation Files (and Paul’s Forum)

61Slide62

Step 1: Registration Page at Effective Volume

62

http://forums.effectivevolume.com/register.php?

In the

Registration Question

Please state “Registering per

Paul Duncan / AAII Wash DC

Meeting”Slide63

Step 2: Confirmation of Registration

63

Step 2: When you receive an email confirming your registration, click on the link in the email. You will receive the following screen:Slide64

Step 3: Registering for Paul’s GGT Forum

Step 3: After you receive the previous screen, you’ll have to wait for an admin-type to approve you into the forum. You will receive an email when this is completed.IF you specified that you were from the AAII Wash DC group, you should be automatically added to the GGT Forum. Here is how you check:1) Log In to http://forums.effectivevolume.com2) (next slide)

64Slide65

Step 3: Checking/Registering for Paul’s GGT Forum

65

Click this First

Click this 2nd

See if this says “Leave

Group” or “Join Group”

Feel free to join the other

groups – it is free.

Paul’s is the

GGT GroupSlide66

Access to AAII Presentation Files

66

This thread “Links” contains the links to the files;

They are at the BOTTOM of the thread.Slide67

File Location w/in Thread

67

The Excel files will be located under this header

Note: this is message 1 of the thread

– it is at the BOTTOM of all the messagesSlide68

Paul Duncan(703) 509-5332

grems8544@gmail.com68