/
Identifying great teachers through their online presence Identifying great teachers through their online presence

Identifying great teachers through their online presence - PowerPoint Presentation

conchita-marotz
conchita-marotz . @conchita-marotz
Follow
378 views
Uploaded On 2017-08-04

Identifying great teachers through their online presence - PPT Presentation

Evanthia Faliagka Maria Rigou Spiros Sirmakessis Qualities of good teachers Teachers are distinguished as liked or disliked based on three criteria academic qualifications relationship with students and personality traits ID: 575739

system personality extroversion teacher personality system teacher extroversion teachers social scores traits experience score candidate ranking liwc work academic

Share:

Link:

Embed:

Download Presentation from below link

Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Identifying great teachers through their..." is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.


Presentation Transcript

Slide1

Identifying great teachers through their online presence

Evanthia Faliagka, Maria Rigou, Spiros SirmakessisSlide2

Qualities of good teachers

Teachers are distinguished as liked or disliked based on three criteria: academic qualifications, relationship with students and personality traitsTraits that yield positive educational resultsConscientiousness (efficient, not lazy, thorough)Agreeableness (warm, forgiving, sympathetic)

Openness

to experience

(curious, imaginative, excitable)

Extroverted

(

sociable

, enthusiastic, forceful,

positive

)

Emotionally stable (calm, self-confident, not shy)

Big-Five personality model (NEO PI-R)Slide3

Previous work

Academic qualifications of teachers come from:CVs and accompanying documentsLinkedInTeacher personality is typically evaluated through special purpose questionnaires/testsInterviewsRecruiting teachers could be performed online provided that we can have some unbiased feedback on teacher personalitySocial web data (from

Facebook

, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) can be the source of such feedback especially in the case of

active users

if we can interpret

social web activities

in terms of

personality traits

demonstrated. Slide4

Proposed system

A system that automates candidate teacher pre-screening process providing an overall candidate rankingbased on supervised learningand automatically extracting applicant

personality

measures

from tweets

and

Fb

posts

This approach has been implemented as a web based teacher evaluation systemSlide5

Architecture

Candidate

teachers

School

director

CV data

Login to

Login to

Position

requirements

Extracting candidate’s skills

Calculating personality traits

Data mining algorithms

Ranked list

of teachers

Applicant education, work experience and

loyalty are

directly extracted from LinkedIn

Personality traits of the candidate are assessed by analyzing posts to Twitter and

FbSlide6

Academic qualifications

Education (in years of formal academic training)Work experience (in years of working at relevant job positionsLoyalty (average number of years spent per job)Slide7

Personality mining

Judging a teacher’s personality (or ANY personality) is a hard problem for automated e-recruitment systems

We

focus on the extroversion personality trait

It is reflected through language use in written speech

It is discriminated through text analysis

It is

a crucial

characteristic in teacher

personality

The

emotional positivity and social orientation of

a person,

both directly extracted from

LIWC frequencies

, can act as predictors of

the extroversion trait

Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count systemSlide8

Calculation of teacher extroversion

To find which words are mentioned most frequently by the candidate we analyze the raw text of tweets and Facebook

posts

The words identified are input to the

TreeTagger

tool for lexical analysis and lemmatization

Then using the

LIWC

dictionary the system classifies the canonical form of word output by the

TreeTagger

A dictionary of word stems classified in certain psycholinguistic categories

We

calculate the LIWC

extroversion

score E

E is estimated directly

from LIWC scores, by summing the emotional positivity

score and the social orientation scoreSlide9

Calculation of teacher extroversion

Finally, we use the regression model which was trained in a previous work of ours that predicts the candidates’ extroversion from their LIWC scores in the {posemo, negemo, social} categories

E

=

S

+1.335*

P

- 2.25*

N

Where:

E is the

extroversion score

S

the frequency of social

words

P

the frequency of positive emotion works N the frequency of negative emotion wordsSlide10

Login pageSlide11

Experience miningSlide12

Ranking

Our system uses machine learning algorithmsIt requires a training set as an inputIt automatically builds the ranking model It calculates the final scoring function h(x)It returns the final ranked list of teachers by applying the learned function to sort themSlide13

Learning-to-rankSlide14

Pilot Scenario

42 teachers logged in to our system as candidates for a job position in a private elementary schoolThe job position was also announced through the systemTeachers were also evaluated manually on their academic qualifications and interviewed for assessing their personality by the school directorAutomated extroversion scores were compared to the interview results referring to each teacher’s extroversion

The data collected

are to be

used as the training set for the ranking algorithmSlide15

Pilot Scenario

Grading scale for the personality extroversion score: 0-5We used Weka to test the correlation of the scores output from the system (i.e. model predictions) with the actual scores assigned by the directorComparison metrics

(

system

vs

director):

Overlap size of the top-k list

Correlation coefficient of the top-k

candidates

Mean absolute

difference

of top-k candidates’ ranks

 

k=8

Top-k

Correlation

Ranking

error

Candidates

6 (

75%

)

0.72

2,6Slide16

Conclusions

The proposed system could be of practical value in speeding up the teacher recruitment process Automating qualifications and personality assessmentFuture work:Use larger training sets Instead of manual character assessment

, use special

questionnaires

and train the system with their results

Use additional

social network metrics

(LinkedIn endorsements and recommendations, no of re-tweets,

Fb

likes and shares, etc)

Incorporate

automated assessment of

teacher scores

in

more personality traits

(agreeableness, openness

to experience, etc) Slide17

Thank you!