MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA 2019 D1 D2A D2B D3 Comparing your Domain 1 score with other campuses with the same percentage of Economic Disadvantage Domain 2B Percent of students scoring at least as high as they did last year in Reading and Math All Grades ID: 767898
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "! ? MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
! ? MIMIC ACCOUNTABILITY USING BENCHMARK DATA
2019 D1 D2A D2B D3 Comparing your Domain 1 score with other campuses with the same percentage of Economic Disadvantage. Domain 2B Percent of students scoring at least as high as they did last year in Reading and Math (All Grades) Domain 2A The average of Approaches, Meets, and Masters (All Subjects and Grades) Domain 1 70% Best of Domain 1, Domain 2A, and Domain 2B 30% The 4 components of Domain 3 Final Score How did each student group do in four components? Academic Achievement - Meets performance in reading and math Academic Growth - reading and math English Language Proficiency – TELPAS Student Success - Average of Approaches, Meets, and Masters (All subjects) Domain 3 The accountability system will be the same as 2018
Up to 14 student groups count for Domain 3 Must have 25 tests Special Ed. & Former Special Ed. Economically Disadvantaged African American, Hispanic, White, American Indian, Asian, Pacific Islander, Two or More Ethnicity/Race Current and Monitor through year 4 English Learners Domain 3 STAAR and STAAR Alt 2 English and Spanish Testers All Students Continuous Enrolled & Non- Cont Enrolled Year 2
Domain 3 Status of Four Components Up to 14 student groups Must have at least 25 tests Based on TELPAS performance scoring at Advanced High or higher than last time. EL Proficiency Meets grade level for reading and math. Academic Achievement Average of Approaches Meets and Masters (All subjects) Student Success 10% 10% 30% Academic Growth Reading and Math . 50% 11.1% 55.6% 33.3%
2019 RAW SCORE TARGETS ARE PROVIDED F D C B A HIGH LOW PROGRESS/GROWTH MEETS AVERAGE TEA says we will use the same targets for four more years Think about how many more students would it take to get to the next Threshold GREEN RANGE
REMEMBER the Spring 2019 data is missing the Science and Social Studies benchmark data from this week!
We will resend the Current Spring 2019 data along with this historical chart next week.
??? Questions Come to our Break-Out Session today!!