Nexus Neami National Evaluation Kevan Myers Team Leader Nexus Dual Diagnosis Service Session outline Dual Diagnosis Context Reasons for U se Package Development Nexus Neami National Reasons ID: 530431
Download Presentation The PPT/PDF document "Reason For Use Package" is the property of its rightful owner. Permission is granted to download and print the materials on this web site for personal, non-commercial use only, and to display it on your personal computer provided you do not modify the materials and that you retain all copyright notices contained in the materials. By downloading content from our website, you accept the terms of this agreement.
Slide1
Reason For Use Package Nexus Neami National Evaluation
Kevan Myers
Team Leader Nexus Dual Diagnosis ServiceSlide2
Session outline
Dual Diagnosis Context
Reasons for
Use Package Development
Nexus Neami National Reasons for Use Package Evaluation
Progress and Future StepsSlide3
Dual diagnosis is when a person experiences mental
illness and substance use issues.
T
here is no “typical” client – common themes and / or varying complexitySometimes called comorbidity or concurrent disorders
What is Dual Diagnosis?Slide4
Australia
Alcohol and other drug use is common amongst people with mental illness:
90 per cent of men with schizophrenia have a drug problem 75 per cent of people with drug problems have a mental illness 64 per cent of psychiatric in-patients have or have had a drug problem
www.sane.orgSlide5
Health Burden
Hartz et al. (2014) found that:• The odds of smoking and alcohol and other substance use to be dramatically higher in severe mental illness than recent estimates of substance use in mild mental illness.
• 30 % of people with severe psychiatric illness engaged in binge drinking, compared to 8% in the general population • 75 % of people with severe psychiatric illness were regular smokers (c.f. 33% in the control group)• 50 % of people with psychotic disorders used marijuana regularly, versus 18 % in the general population.• Half of those with mental illness also used other illicit drugs, versus 12% in the general population.
The early mortality in people with severe mental illness (25 years earlier than individuals in the general population) is largely attributable to medical illnesses that are associated with substance use disorders.” Slide6
“Despite isolated examples of good practice, estimates show that only seven per cent of people with a co – existing mental illness and substance use disorder will receive treatment for both problems”
Thriving, not just Surviving –
Australia's National Mental Health Report Card 2013
Ch 3Slide7
Victorian Dual
Diagnosis Initiative
Four Metro teams established 2001
Nexus Dual Diagnosis ServiceEastern Dual Diagnosis ServiceSouthern Dual Diagnosis ServiceSUMITT (Substance Use & Mental Illness Treatment teamRural and remote DD clinicians across VictoriaSlide8
An approach to the development of sustainable skills,
organisational structures, resources and commitment to health improvement in health and other sectors, to prolong and multiply health gains many times over.
Hawe
et al: 1999 Capacity BuildingSlide9
Why does dual diagnosis matter?
Can’t treat one without the other!Slide10
DD Approach
Harm Minimisation
A philosophy underpinning Australia’s drug
treatment strategy since 1985.
An approach that aims to reduce the adverse health, social and economic consequences of misuse of alcohol and other drugs, by minimising
or limiting the harms and hazards of drug use for
both the community and the individual, without
necessarily eliminating use.
* Integrated
treatment
‘Welcoming, responsive and Hopeful’ –
MinkoffSlide11
A resource that facilitates therapeutic conversations with consumers to explore issues relating to the interaction between their mental health and alcohol and other drug use.
Designed by Simon
Kroes &
Kevan Myers
Reasons for Use Package
Go to Main Menu
Go to Domains Slide12
What is it?
In Power Point format and WORD
The RFU Scale & Scoring systemFollow up strategies and relevant resources
Mentoring Process Slide13
Who Made It?
Simon Kroes and Kevan Myers from Nexus Dual Diagnosis Service at St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne by building on the Reasons for Use Scale Professor David Castle et al developed and researched.Slide14
Why did you make it?
Unrealistic Expectation: Knowledge = ability.
The sector relies on conversations to create change. We believe that there is a need for a practical DD resource to facilitate this process
Getting the approach to exploring DD issues is crucialThe Reasons for Use Package (RFUP) was designed in response to workers in the field asking for resources to assist them after they have done initial screening to detect dual diagnosis issues.
“I’ve done the screen, what do I do now” Slide15
How do I use it?
1. Apply Reasons for Use scale
2. Consult Domain based strategies
3. Provide Feedback to client and collaborate with consumer on treatmentSlide16
About the RFU Scale
The Reasons for Use scale (Spencer et al 2002) is a 26-item self-report instrument. It includes items from the Drinking Motive Questionnaire (Cooper et al 1995) and additional motives specific to symptoms of mental illness.
It is administered to better understand participant's reasons for use and thus tailor the intervention(s) to meet the individual’s needs.Slide17
Development of the RFU Package
The RFU scale (Spencer et al 2002) has been used extensively by clinicians in various fields.
Nexus has drawn on this practice wisdom to create the RFU Package.
The RFU Package is a compilation of existing tools, interventions and information that may be used following the administration of the RFU scale.Slide18
Is it user friendly?
The RFUP has been built to align with common health and welfare skills that workers already have. It provides a framework for applying these skills in a practical and user friendly manner. People from a range of disciplines, including psychology, occupational therapy and social work, who have used the RFUP found the package easy to use.Slide19
Steps to HereGap Identified
Initial concept and designNeeds analysis 2012 confirmation3 Pilots – including MH, MHCSS, AOD and housingNN staff asked for further roll out
Research partnership established – Nexus NN MonashNational trialDisseminationSlide20
Research steps
Literature Review
Research Partnership
Research DesignEthicsInterventionAnalysisWriting and dissemination of resultsSlide21
Research Partnership Established
Simon Kroes &
K
evan Myers: Nexus Dual Diagnosis ServiceDr Melissa Petrakis:
Monash University School of Social Work Kerry Stringer & Sarah O’Connor: Neami National Service Development Unit Slide22
Research Design
Two groups of 40+
Neami
National staff from comparable sites.Control group NSW site.Intervention site Victoria.Both groups surveyed at 3 time points
12 Questions knowledge and confidence in DD interventions. Nb these are based on the domains of the RFU Scale. Victorian group receive Training and Mentoring in RFUP.
Consumers who participate in RFUP offered Feedback Questionnaire.Slide23
Governance
St Vincent's HREC-A have approved the research
Monash
University Ethics Committee have approved research.Neami National Research Committee has approved the researchSlide24
Data Analysis
Statistical Analysis of de-identified quantitative data from 3 x time point survey questions and Consumer questionnaire
Thematic
Analysis of de-identified qualitative data from Mentor and Mentee Focus groupsSlide25
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide26
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide27
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide28
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide29
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide30
NEAMI NATIONAL REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON
TRIAL
STAFF SURVEYS 2015Slide31
Staff Focus Group SW Honors student Rebecca Robinson ran a staff focus group during her placement with Neami National
All participants had been trained and mentored in the RFUP and had used the Package with consumers
4 male participants and 2 female participants that worked at Neami National.Slide32
Focus Group Results The RFUP was compatible
with the WHO Assist screening tool and Collaborative Recovery Model (CRM) used at Neami NationalIncreased
knowledge and insight around Dual Diagnosis for both staff and consumersMentor Support was beneficial in initial stages
Consumer Relationship improved due to the collaborative approach of the RFUPStaff desired further training in DD interventions Slide33
NEAMI NATIONAL -
REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON TRIAL CONSUMER
FEEDBACK - 2015
73.7%
84.2%
73.7%
78.9%Slide34
NEAMI NATIONAL -
REASONS FOR USE PACKAGE COMPARISON TRIAL CONSUMER
FEEDBACK - 2015
68.4%
78.9%
78.9%
Average ‘Agree’ = 76.7%Slide35
Future Steps
Writing up and of dissemination results
State, National and International PresentationsNeami National Implementation
Completion of the Online RFUP with MADA Monash Art Design and ArchitectureTrial of Online version with Victorian AgenciesTrial of RFUP with international agenciesSlide36
Thank You
Kevan Myers
Email
: kevan.myers@svha.org.auSlide37
References
Hartz, S. M., Pato, C. N., Medeiros, H., Cavazos-Rehg, P., Sobell, J. L., Knowles, J. A., ... & Vivar, A. (2014). Comorbidity of Severe Psychotic Disorders with Measures of Substance Use.
JAMA psychiatry.Minkoff, K & Cline, C (2004)
Changing the World: The design and Implementation of Comprehensive Continuous Integrated Systems of Care for individuals with Co-occurring Disorders.Psychiatric Clinics of North America. Vol 27.4Spencer, C., Castle, D., & Michie, P.T. (2002). Motivations that maintain substance use among individuals with psychotic disorders. Schizophrenia bulletin, 28(2), 233-247.